English

Statement from the Africa-Europe Joint Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM) on key issues in the AU-EU Partnership

Statement from the Africa-Europe Joint Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM) on key issues in the AU-EU Partnership

Addis Ababa and Brussels—8 April 2024

A flourishing partnership between Africa and Europe can be founded only on the fundamental principle that humanity is one. This implies that the prosperity and well-being of one continent is inextricably bound up with the welfare of the other. While many endorse this proposition in principle, reshaping structures and relationships between both continents according to the reality of global interdependence will require sustained and sincere effort. The Africa-Europe relationship is often described as a partnership, but the existing relationship does not yet reflect this ideal. Many of today’s economic and political systems were created at a time when the primacy of one part of the world was considered a basic fact. Further, European geopolitical objectives and the economic interests of large multinational companies continue to weigh heavily on the relationship. 

Overcoming the complex effects of this reality will require that the voices of those most affected by decisions be placed at the core of the relationship. It will also require resisting the tendency for any one region of the world to consider itself a model for others to follow. Policy frameworks which largely associate prosperity and success with, for example, the experience of urbanisation and industrialisation in the global North will need to be re-evaluated. A meaningful partnership, then, requires the recognition that both continents are on a common path of learning, with neither having perfected a paradigm of prosperity that is sustainable and furthers global justice. These principles will have implications for all areas of policy, requiring attention to the root causes of problems, not just their superficial symptoms. In this connection below we outline several specific areas that require attention, in which the contributions of civil society can bring value to and strengthen the relationship between the African Union and European Union. 

Governance, Peace and Multilateralism

The need to focus on root causes is particularly relevant in the domain of governance and security. A fundamental value, deeply entrenched in both African and European civil societies and young people, is respect for human life and dignity. We note with deep concern the growing prevalence of violent conflict in different parts of the world. Governance arrangements, from constitutional structures to practical policies, must seek to protect human rights, and respect the rule of law, both domestically and internationally. Existing instruments to tackle conflicts, such as the African Peace and Security Architecture, must be better utilised in support of these aims. Further, it is imperative that youth, women and persons with disabilities are systematically included in conflict prevention, peace mediation, peace building, diplomacy efforts, as outlined in Resolutions 2250, 1325, 2475 of the United Nations, and the EU’s Youth Action Plan. 

The absence of adequate social protection and public services, and a lack of educational and employment opportunities, contribute to distrust towards governments and create fertile ground for the spread of extremist ideologies and terrorism. In addition to providing such services and opportunities, the EU, AU and Member States should prioritise proactive efforts to promote social cohesion and prevent conflict in inclusive, participatory and trust-based partnerships with civil society and communities themselves. 

Effective multilateral governance, and efforts to promote peace and well-being, will require spaces that allow a variety of African and European actors to engage jointly at different levels, spaces in which an open and rich conversation about respective experiences, needs, challenges, and opportunities can unfold. The proposed AU-EU Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM) is one such space that can perform a convening function, facilitating interaction and engagement between actors on both continents. It is especially important that those at the grassroots have opportunities to engage with institutions at various levels, to ensure that policy and strategy made at the intercontinental level promotes joint priorities, that flagship initiatives resonate with local realities and possible existing solutions, and that no one is left behind. 

Food Systems and Rural Transformation

Fulfilling the right to food for all requires just, sustainable and resilient food systems that are defined by people, rooted in food sovereignty, and shaped by planetary boundaries. The foundation for such systems already exists, in the family-based, territorially embedded, small-scale, diversified food provisioning modalities that feed the majority of the world’s people, especially in Africa. However, their potential is held back by the dominance of a corporate and industrial, globalised food provisioning model, which receives disproportionate political attention and support. 

Redesigning food systems in ways that promote shared prosperity and ecological balance will require supporting democratic policy decision-making rooted in a human rights framework by enacting the proposed Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM), reinforcing the role of the UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS) and respecting international rights-based frameworks such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants. 

We call for: shifting financing towards the agroecological transition and reducing African dependency on food imports by prioritising EU investments and funding for peasant agroecological food production and developing modalities for channelling funding directly to small-scale producers through their organisations; defending peasant seeds and people’s access to and control over land; protecting territorial food markets from imports that undercut local products; prohibiting the production and export of highly hazardous pesticides and promoting bio-fertiliser production; applying a gender lens to all food and agriculture activities and investments and, ensuring that EU policies and practices do not undermine food and nutrition security in any partner countries, particularly policies in areas of debt, climate, trade, agriculture and fishery policies and corporate due diligence. 

Climate and Energy

The climate, environmental and biodiversity crises are global but the impacts are local. Addressing climate change and environmental degradation requires that the advancement of the global common good be approached as a primary objective, one no less important than securing national or regional interests. The EU and AU must meet and go beyond international commitments to prevent the worst impacts of climate change. Leaders and policymakers in Africa and Europe are confronted with a critical question in considering the merits of any proposed action on climate and energy, be it national or international: will a decision advance the good of the population in both continents, and indeed the whole world? 

Finding integrated solutions that reduce dependence on fossil fuels, promote climate adaptation, protect biodiversity, and embrace a just transition for all will require inclusive decision-making processes that involve affected communities and stress the connection between environmental sustainability and social equity. Closer engagement with the grassroots, including through the proposed CSEM, will allow for a more thorough understanding of the impact of policies adopted in one continent on another. Such engagement is necessary to empower local communities, particularly Indigenous Peoples, CSOs, women and rural populations, so that they can lead on the governance of biodiversity, climate initiatives and their delivery. 

Migration and Mobility

The question of international migration cannot be addressed in isolation from the broader relationship between the two continents. Any framework claiming to address migration cannot shy away from looking at the continuously widening economic disparity existing at the global scale, the generation, distribution and utilisation of wealth, the organisation of the world’s raw materials, or the coordination of markets. After all, it is impossible to minimise the drivers of migration while neglecting to reconsider economic processes that leave some countries with little chance to prosper. European policymakers in particular must reflect on the inadvertent effect of their policies, whether foreign, trade, investment or environmental, on the socio-economic conditions that drive the flow of individuals across borders.. 

Further, it is imperative to reframe the narrative around migrants from one that presents them as a burden or even threat, to one that emphasises the manifold contributions they make to the life of the societies to which they migrate. This principle requires that the African and European Unions work more closely together to enhance migration and mobility cooperation as a legitimate process with high developmental potential, with European policies that are more responsive to African demands, including opening new channels for regular migration. One practical implication of this is the need to review visa regimes which disproportionately burden African citizens. The provision of academic visas, for example, should be reviewed in order to bolster exchange programmes for students, professors, and researchers. Increasing integration between African and European youth through youth networks, associations, and platforms will also help to facilitate cultural exchanges, enhance collaboration and cultivate a sense of global citizenship and responsibility among young people. 

The protection and equitable treatment of those in need, such as refugees and displaced persons, should remain a common priority. In this regard, systems to oversee the work of asylum and border agencies must be strengthened in order to address the unjust and sometimes illegal treatment of individuals attempting to cross borders. The criminalisation of those who act in solidarity with migrants must be avoided. 

Human Development through Health and Education

During the 2022 AU-EU Summit, health emerged as a key political concern, not least in the context of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Health remains fundamental for sustainable development, and it is thus crucial to maintain this focus in the delivery of the Partnership’s commitments. Efforts have been made to boost local production of health products in Africa, but progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has been slow and investments in infrastructure and skilled personnel in the health sector are still desperately needed. Upholding Africa's health sovereignty is paramount, along with promoting a rights-based approach to health, including sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), and gender equality. 

Access to quality and inclusive education at all levels from early childhood, to primary, secondary and higher education, including technical, vocational education and training is equally essential. Steps must urgently be taken to ensure universal access to education, regardless of socio-economic background, ethnic or national origin, gender, or disability. It is also crucial to decolonise education systems to reflect African countries’ unique context, realities, and challenges. Emphasis must be placed on delivering affordable, accessible, high-quality education that equips youth on both continents with the necessary skills and competencies to thrive in and shape a rapidly changing world. Considering current and projected shortages, particularly on the African continent, investing in infrastructure, educators’ training and professional development, salaries and working conditions is of the utmost importance. 

Significant domestic and international investments are needed to strengthen health, public education and social protection systems, including by expanding the fiscal space of African countries through debt relief. 

*** 

The challenges facing the AU-EU partnership are only likely to increase in range and complexity. Embracing the adjustments in thought and action outlined above will facilitate significant steps towards the sincere and mutually beneficial relationship which both partners have called for. 

 

Signatories / Signataires 

– ACT Alliance EU

– ActionAids

– Justice and Dignity for the Women of Sahel 

– Africa Europe Faith Justice Network AEFJN 

– African Women's Development and Communications Network (FEMNET) 

– African Youth Commission

– AfroLeadership 

– All Africa Conference of Churches

– Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA) 

– Bahá´í International Community

– Biodiversity and Biosafety Association of Kenya (BIBA-K)

– Caritas Africa 

– Caritas Europa 

– Centre for Social Impact Studies (CeSIS) 

– CIDSE 

– CONCORD Europe 

– Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevölkerung (DSW) 

– Food and Agricultural Youths Institute of IAAS 

– Independent Continental Youth Advisory Council on AfCFTA (ICOYACA) 

– Network of the Independent Commission for Human Rights in North Africa (CIDH Africa) 

– Observatoire Kisal Bénin 

– One Hour for Europe ITALIA/Youth Intra Dialogue on Europe and Africa (OHFE/Y-IDEA) 

– PELUM Zambia 

– PMU Sweden 

– Red Cross EU 

– Single Mothers Association of Kenya (SMAK) 

– Symposium of Episcopal Conference of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM)

– Syndicat UMT Maroc 

– Tanzania Association of Non-Governmental Organizations TANGO 

– Vienna Institute for International Cooperation and Dialogue (VIDC)

– WaterAid 

– Wetlands International 

– West African Network of Peasants and Agricultural Producers (ROPPA)

– YEWGlobal Foundation 

– Youth Alliance for Leadership and Development in Africa (YALDA)

– Youth Senate Kenya

Statement regarding the Baha’is in Yemen to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

Statement regarding the Baha’is in Yemen to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

40th Meeting - 55th Regular Session of Human Rights Council

Geneva—22 March 2024

Five Yemeni Baha’is are still in detention in Yemen after armed Houthis raided a peaceful Baha’i gathering almost 10 months ago and detained 17 people. They are being held without charge or due process just because of their religion. The Baha’i International Community continues to call for their immediate release.

Along with many other Yemeni Baha'is, the 12 that have been released are under continuous surveillance, jeopardizing their safety and restricting their freedom of movement. The 12 were forced to sign undertakings for their release and then forced into an indoctrination program intended to induce them to recant their Baha’i beliefs.

The sad irony is that the Houthis continue to relentlessly persecute their own people at a time when they try to portray themselves as defenders of the oppressed.

We commend the ongoing efforts of the Special Envoy for Yemen in securing a UN-backed roadmap to end the civil war in Yemen, with the crucial participation of all parties. This process presents a significant opportunity to address the critical issue of discrimination against minorities and to build a united and inclusive society. Ensuring the full participation of all segments of Yemeni society is fundamental to building a lasting peace and fostering the well-being of all Yemenis. The Baha'is of Yemen, along with all others, are striving towards this shared  aspiration of  a more prosperous Yemen.

A European Union Youth Strategy: Some Considerations

A European Union Youth Strategy: Some Considerations

Brussels—22 March 2024

Youth as protagonists of their social environments

Any strategy related to youth must be underpinned by the conviction that they should be protagonists in the process of social change. For youth to realise this potential, other social actors they interact with need to see them in this light, and demonstrate their confidence that youth can arise as agents of change. Youth themselves also need to believe that this potential resides within them. 

However, the social forces that distort how youth see themselves are becoming stronger. Mounting global, national, and local challenges, and the divisive and antagonistic ways such challenges are often approached, can leave many youth feeling powerless in the face of what seem like insurmountable problems. 

And yet, at a time of life when young people wrestle with the fundamental questions of who they are, how they should relate to others, and what their place in the world is, they possess great capacity to reimagine themselves and their society. If adequately supported and encouraged, this natural capacity enables them to become active protagonists of change, not simply passive bystanders in a world being made for them. It is during this crucial moment in life, one of great opportunity and great challenge, that youth will require the wholehearted attention of European policymakers, so that they can help shape the progress of society. 

Broadening the role and purpose of education 

One of the most fundamental conditions for youth to realise their potential as protagonists of social progress is access to empowering educational processes. 

However, narrow conceptions of education and its purpose can limit a young person’s capacity to flourish, to make informed choices about the future, and to meaningfully contribute to society. Educational systems that reduce education to the assimilation of information or the acquisition of technical skills needed to compete in the labour market, conceptualise a young person’s learning trajectory as a ladder to climb at a faster pace than others, promoting harmful pressures and superficial incentives, and can stifle rather than cultivate a thirst for knowledge that propels a fulfilling educational journey. 

If youth are to be protagonists, education must inspire them to use their endowments not only for their own progress, but for the betterment of society as a whole. In this respect, education systems must cultivate the capacity to analyse one’s society—its needs and possibilities for progress—must nurture a sense of moral responsibility towards that society, and must assist young people to explore in both theory and practise how they can use the knowledge gained during their education to address these needs. In this way, young people can come to see engagement in meaningful work, for example, not merely through the lens of self-interest, but as a powerful means to serve society. 

Strengthening community life and intergenerational relationships 

Beyond educational settings, other social spaces in which youth are present have a significant, often overlooked, formative impact on them. A local community that connects diverse individuals and families in a reciprocal web of mutual support, trust, and solidarity, provides another environment in which youth can both develop the capabilities and qualities necessary to contribute to social progress, and at the same time receive support in facing the various struggles on the path to adulthood. 

Intergenerational relationships are a crucial component of community life. Older members of a community can provide advice and encouragement, while regarding youth as capable protagonists whose ideas are to be embraced with open-mindedness. Similarly, nurturing in youth responsibility for the social, intellectual, and moral development of generations younger than themselves, can strengthen their sense of agency and purpose, and inspire them to exemplify high ideals. In turn, the care youth extend to the next generation ensures that rising cohorts of children will have support as they pass through their own adolescent years. 

What this requires is a reimagining of the social relations at the heart of European society, and a collective process of learning on how local communities can be strengthened and the generational fragmentation of society be overcome. 

Fostering youth commitment towards all of humanity 

The many challenges facing humanity cannot be resolved without the understanding that humanity is one, and that the well-being of any segment of the global population is contingent upon the well-being of the whole. Therefore, every dimension of a European strategy for youth must give attention to nurturing conviction in humanity’s essential oneness. Without this, even well-intended efforts to empower youth will fall short of creating the conditions for effective cooperation at the local, national, and international levels that are crucial to addressing the many existential issues confronting humanity. 

Bringing diverse populations together 

Youth have an irreplaceable role to play in devising solutions to all of the challenges facing European society. There is, however, one challenge that warrants their special attention: that of ensuring that the European continent, blessed with cultural, ethnic, and religious diversity, becomes a place where youth and populations of various backgrounds feel they belong and can play a part in shaping its future. 

Youth must be at the vanguard of efforts to build a new set of relationships among diverse populations at the grassroots, grounded in the conviction of the oneness of humanity. Prejudice is perpetuated in social contexts in which individuals merely live side by side without opportunities for meaningful interaction. At the local level, youth can learn to bring diverse individuals together and engage in activities that contribute to the well-being of the entire village or neighbourhood. While youth possess great capacity to convene, they also require sustained encouragement from their communities and institutions, such as municipalities, community centres, and arts, leisure, and sports organisations. 

Participation in consequential decision-making processes 

Treating youth as meaningful protagonists of their social environments also requires their participation in processes and spaces through which consequential decisions are made, particularly those that shape policy. Fostering a culture in which youth feel that their voices are heard and their opinions valued will need to go beyond the establishment of formal mechanisms for youth participation. It will require cultivating a posture of openness and humility towards the creative and sometimes challenging insights that young people will bring to policy discussions. If youth are given such creative space, they will not only be able to contribute to existing policy processes, but can bring fresh ideas to help rethink and reshape current social structures. In this respect, young people should not be regarded merely as the inheritors of existing social systems. 

Youth and well-being 

Younger generations across Europe are experiencing increasing levels of loneliness, isolation, frustration, hopelessness, and lack of self-worth, giving rise to profound concern for their well-being. The relationships, environments, and purposeful contributions to society described above are essential to a young person’s true flourishing and well-being. However, the strength of the forces that breed passivity and distort young people’s sense of self-worth should not be underestimated. Entire industries, for example, are growing ever-more proficient at monopolising the attention and energy of young people with endless entertainment and distractions. 

There is a need to question this course that society has set itself on, and to reflect on the extent to which a young person’s development in today’s world is being compromised by unbridled access to destructive content, carried through the medium of technology. Focused attention is required, including by youth themselves, to the question of how systems for the promotion and regulation of media, technology, and culture can be reshaped towards socially constructive ends.

Statement regarding the Baha’is in Qatar to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

Statement regarding the Baha’is in Qatar to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

38th Meeting - 55th Regular Session of Human Rights Council

Geneva—21 March 2024

Mr President,

Regrettably, we find ourselves compelled, once again, to raise the situation of the Baha’is in Qatar in this esteemed forum. Despite ongoing efforts to engage in dialogue with Qatari officials both by Baha’is in Qatar and the Baha’i International Community, we have seen no significant steps being taken by the Qatari authorities to resolve the longstanding discrimination against the Baha'is– this, despite the delegation’s own statement on 8 March at this Council stressing the necessity of promoting a culture of dialogue and respect for diversity.

Since our last statement to this Council, four more Baha’is have either been expelled from employment, or denied certificates of good conduct needed for them to change their employer or sponsor. Yet these are law abiding residents and the authorities have not provided justification for these actions.

On 3rd October 2023, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recommended to Qatar that it “take positive measures to prevent and address the discrimination faced by religious minorities, notably members of the Baha’i religious community, and to remove all obstacles to the enjoyment of their economic, social and cultural rights.”

The Baha’i International Community restates its continued readiness to engage in dialogue with Qatari authorities, to identify measures that can be taken to help redress the ongoing discrimination which the Baha’is in Qatar face solely because of their religious beliefs.

Statement regarding Baha’is in Iran to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

Statement regarding Baha’is in Iran to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

55th UN Human Rights Council session

Geneva—18 March 2024

Mr. President,

Last week, in a heart-rending act, Iranian authorities leveled over 30 Bahá’í graves in Tehran. Not only plots of land—these were human beings, each with a lived story of tremendous suffering and persecution for their faith. Among them was an elderly woman whose husband was executed for being a Bahá’í, her sons banned from universities, also for their faith, and then both imprisoned for years, resulting in her raising their young children. When she died, her burial in the Bahá’í cemetery was refused. So, her family donated her body to science as an act of service to society. Cruelly, the hospital rejected her body, labeling it as “religiously unclean”. Persecution continued, when her body was then forcibly buried in a mass gravesite. And now, barely three months later, that site has been leveled.

Today, we ask the Iranian government, what threats do the dead pose to society? How do you justify your acts, in your conscience, knowing that even in death you do not leave Bahá’ís in peace, imposing brutality on them even in their grief? There is no religious or cultural norm that would ever support this kind of cruelty.

The Fact-Finding Mission, in its report, documented an increase in the persecution against religious minorities since last year’s uprising. The Bahá’í community, a long-suffering group, is one such example. We call for the extension of the mandate of the Fact-Finding Mission as it ensures accountability of Iran for its harrasment of the Bahá'ís and all others seeking equality.

Reimagining the Role of Institutions in Building Gender-Equal Societies

Reimagining the Role of Institutions in Building Gender-Equal Societies

A statement of the Baha'i International Community to the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women

 
New York—22 February 2024

In the Katuyola village of Zambia, the governing institution of a local faith community, elected by its members, organized a two-day gathering of some 120 local women of various faith backgrounds to explore questions related to the role of women in society. Male members of the institution handled logistical arrangements such as cooking and serving food, so that female members could more fully participate in the gathering—a level of support described by many as a remarkable shift within the historical context of their society. 

Part of an ongoing process of consultation and collaboration among traditional leaders, faith actors, parents, youth, and children, this gathering resulted in literacy classes for women in the village, assistance with backyard gardens and a local savings bank to help them generate income, and the establishment of a local center of learning. Just as importantly, the gathering explored what adjustments to the functioning of the village, including its institutional structures and norms, would be required to more fully embody the principle of gender equality, and remove barriers to women’s full engagement in community life. 

What does it look like for institutions to prioritize gender equality and its many requirements, instead of women being relegated to the sidelines? What does it look like for gender equality to advance concurrently across a variety of institutions, as opposed to progress in one arena being hampered by continued obstacles in others? What does it look like for institutions to be characterized by qualities such as flexibility, responsiveness, and collaboration, rather than traits traditionally associated with norms of patriarchy, such as behavior that is authoritarian or competitive? 

Experiences like those in Katuyola begin to address such questions and give a glimpse of the influence that institutions have on the roles, circumstances, and opportunities open to women and girls. Societies characterized by robust patterns of gender equality will become possible only as institutions—perhaps especially related to education, governance, and commerce—are increasingly recast according to principles of equality and justice, and the members within them strive to apply such principles in their work and service. 

Sadly, without the necessary institutional vision, ethical commitment, and operational capabilities, various forms of corruption or simply a lack of effective functioning have led to the erosion of public trust in institutions and, in many places, a growing crisis of authority and governance. The Bahá’í International Community therefore welcomes, as both relevant and timely, the focus of this year’s Commission on the Status of Women, on strengthening institutions as a means of advancing gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls.

*

It is an unfortunate reality that many institutions and their members today are committed to the status quo, with some actively working to maintain biased or inequitable patterns of gender relations. Yet many others, from those formally affiliated with the women’s movement to those undertaking broad efforts that nevertheless benefit women and girls, are daily advancing the cause of gender equality. Assisting all such institutions to become more effective in the good work they do—for example, by organizing regular spaces where different organizations can share and draw from one another's experiences in a common process of learning—is a key means of ensuring that policies and decisions become increasingly gender responsive. Agencies and organizations related to the women’s movement would therefore do well to give attention to the functioning of relevant institutions, just as institutions of all kinds need to be giving attention to the advancement of women.

To promote progress toward gender-equal societies, institutional structures need to embrace a mode of continual adaptation in response to evolving social realities. The need for institutional flexibility—in structure, operational norms, organizational refinement, and similar elements—is clear enough to those familiar with international processes. Yet such flexibility is often resisted in practice, whether through fear of change or simply the inertia of the status quo. Such tendencies will need to be overcome if institutions are to effectively pursue their aims. In particular, a deep sense of shared endeavor around the common cause of gender equality must transcend loyalty to any one department, program, agency, or funding source. 

As institutions strive to refine their functioning, they can assist the implementation of global agendas or national policies to be more responsive to the context-specific realities facing women and girls in different localities. Helpful in this regard is the notion of a shared conceptual framework, that defines both broad principles that will guide grassroots action, as well as the methodological approaches that underlie it. Organizing endeavors around such a framework ensures a baseline of common elements that allows diverse actors to speak productively to one another and contribute to a collective body of experience and knowledge—learning from one another's approaches but not blindly imitating them. 

Institutions can also serve a vital function in facilitating flows of information and knowledge, including from one level of activity or analysis to another. In the pursuit of constructive social change, particularly in areas of belief, attitude, and values such as gender equality, the richest experience tends to emerge from the grassroots. Often it is at the street corner, village square, or kitchen table where the deepest insights emerge, into how biased norms and the many habits of patriarchy can start to loosen and make way for new relationships between women and men. Yet such processes are limited if they are not connected to channels of inquiry and experience at wider levels. An important need, therefore, is strengthening institutional mechanisms by which grassroots experiences related to the advancement of women can be collected from local communities, aggregated at the national or global level, and analyzed to identify constructive patterns and effective approaches. Resulting insights can then be disseminated back to the grassroots through those same channels, informing future planning and action. 

*

Institutions function in collaboration with local communities and numerous individuals in advancing the common good. In a wide variety of cultural contexts, the principles and elements described above have proven vital to all three of those key protagonists upholding more faithfully and applying more consistently the principle of gender equality. Institutions have become more effective agents of true social transformation as they have both refined the processes of their internal functioning and aligned those processes with essential moral and ethical convictions: that women and men have always been equal in capacity and potential, for example; that the welfare of any segment of humanity is inextricably bound up with the welfare of the whole; that rational investigation of the truth must prevail over adherence to rigid ideologies and baseless prejudices.

Though only humble steps on a much longer path, examples like the ongoing gatherings of women in Katuyola reveal possibilities for new approaches to the institutions of society and new patterns of relationship between them and the individuals and communities they serve. In such experiences can be seen examples of how the principle of gender equality emerges in a population as a valued end in its own right, as well as a means to more effectively achieve all other objectives. In this way, a coherent and broad-based movement toward the construction of more gender-equal societies can begin to take shape in more and more areas.

A Change in Tactics: The Iranian Government’s Recent Persecution of Baha’is

A Change in Tactics: The Iranian Government’s Recent Persecution of Baha’is

A Statement by the Baha’i International Community

December 2023

Persian translation here

Geneva—4 December 2023

The Baha’i International Community is profoundly concerned by a change in tactics in the Iranian government’s persecution of the Baha’i community—the country’s largest non-Muslim religious minority. Baha’is have been persecuted since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when more than 200 Baha’is were executed, and today are suppressed in all areas of life. But the changes in the Iranian government’s treatment of the Baha’is represents an escalation and intensification of its policy of systematic persecution against the community.

The following statement details a range of new and ever harsher methods the authorities are using to persecute the Baha’is. The methods include home raids and searches, arrests, trials, prison terms, land and property confiscations, hate speech, the denial of education, and the denial of burial rights and of basic citizenship rights.

The principal goal of these new tactics, the Baha’i International Community believes, is to sow fear and confusion, to disenfranchise and further impoverish Baha’is, to prolong the harassment of individuals, and to instill feelings of uncertainty and thus rob all Baha'is of peace and security in their daily lives.

Violent home raids, searches, and arrests

The past few months have witnessed several increasingly disturbing trends in the incidents of persecution of the Baha’is in Iran. A systematic program of home invasions and arrests has been unfolding in cities across the country, starting successively with Shiraz, then Yazd, Isfahan, and most recently in Hamedan, Karaj and Shirvan. Since the beginning of October, 40 Baha’is have been arrested and the homes of close to 100 families have been invaded and searched.

One of the most disturbing trends has been the violent and abusive treatment of the Baha’is by members of the security agencies undertaking searches and arrests, as well as the verbal and physical abuse being suffered by individuals under interrogation in detention centers.

In one city, for instance, when security agents invaded the home of a family, the young son objected to the disruptive search by the agents and their activities. The agents then severely beat the boy in front of his parents and his grandmother, who were powerless to intervene, leaving him handcuffed with bruising plastic ties and in pain. In another case, a mother of a young family arrived home after taking her child to school and noticed four men waiting in the alley. When the woman opened the door of her home, she was forcefully thrown inside by the four men, who followed without presenting a search warrant and proceeded to conduct a search of her home. And in a third instance, during a home raid, the father of the household suffered a heart attack as his daughter was taken to prison.

And in the most recent home invasions in Hamedan, armed and masked agents forcibly broke into the homes of 33 families, several of which housed elderly and infirm women in their 80s, including one suffering from Alzheimer’s disease and under the constant care of a nurse. When the nurse at first refused to open the door to the security agents, they retaliated by breaking windows and breaking down the door to enter. Agents abused and intimidated these elderly women and their families, searched and ransacked their homes, and in at least three cases this treatment resulted in hospitalization of the elderly as a result of trauma and stress. One of these women suffered a heart attack during the raid and required resuscitation. Armed agents also intimidated and threatened other homeowners at gunpoint.

The home invasions and searches have become extremely intrusive, resulting in the complete ransacking of homes; in some cases, agents have removed ceramic floor tiles, torn open furniture and have even destroyed musical instruments. In other cases, homes have been subjected to intrusive surveillance through the installation of surveillance cameras trained on the doors of the homes of Baha’i families, to monitor their activities and visitors.

Several of the households that experienced raids were then pressured by the Iranian authorities—which threatened them with serious additional repercussions should they disclose details of their experience to outside parties. Agents have also deleted smartphone videos, CCTV videos, and other records, in an effort to eliminate any evidence of their actions against the Baha’i community.

Throughout this recent upsurge in attacks on the Baha’is, more than two-thirds of those arrested and detained have been women, many of whom are in their twenties and thirties, and who have been forcibly separated from their young children. Many of the raids on families with young children occurred when the children were present—intensifying fear and panic within the families.

In one recent case, a young woman was arrested and jailed for five years merely for making enquiries with authorities about the burial of her grandmother—separating her for the next five years from her five-year old daughter. Another woman with two children was recently imprisoned for 10 years after spending a year in detention without trial.

Many of the arrested individuals have been detained without trial for extended periods, some in local prisons and others at specialized Ministry of Intelligence detention facilities. Several current cases have been in detention for periods of several months, and one for more than 247 days, each without trial and while being denied release on bail. The detainees are awaiting trials for “crimes” that the rest of the world would consider as providing community service.

False charges and severe prison terms

Long and unjust prison terms are being handed down by the courts for Baha’i individuals on trumped-up charges such as “membership of the deviant Baha’i sect” or the ridiculous charge of “social activities with the intention of propagating the heretical Baha'i sect.” Several Baha’is have been sentenced to long prison terms for their humanitarian assistance such as teaching homeless and underprivileged Iranian or Afghan children and for providing relief to earthquake victims. The Iranian authorities are criminalizing the generous and selfless services offered by members of the Baha’i community in support of others in need.

There are currently at least 70 individuals either in detention or serving prison sentences, the largest number in the past six years, reflecting the recent upsurge in the level of persecution of the Baha’i community. And about 1,200 others are either involved in ongoing court proceedings relating to incidents of persecution or have been sentenced and are awaiting the summons to serve their prison terms. Sentencing by the courts has also become increasingly harsh, with tens of Baha’is sentenced to a combined total of hundreds of years in prison in recent weeks.

Detained Baha’is are routinely interrogated and, at the beginning of recent interrogations, several prisoners experienced threats and psychological pressure and abuse. In some cases, the threats did lead to physical harm being inflicted on some of the prisoners, including women.

The unjust treatment of those in detention has recently extended to the denial of leave for prisoners to visit dying loved ones.

Baha’is that have been released on bail are required to post exorbitant amounts either in cash or by posting their property deeds as collateral. Bails for Baha’is are now typically on the order of 20 to 80 times the annual salary of an individual employed in government service in Iran, placing a heavy financial burden on these Baha’is and their extended families. A recent example was of a young woman from Shiraz, in her early twenties, being required to post bail of an amount close to US $200,000, a vast sum for any ordinary Iranian citizen.

State-sponsored theft, denial of education, and hate speech

Another disturbing trend has been the nature of items being confiscated from Baha’i homes. Whereas previous confiscations usually focused on Baha’i sacred books, photographs, and mobile electronic devices and computer equipment, recent searches and confiscations have included any available cash and bank cards, personal jewelry and other valuable items, property deeds, vehicle deeds, identity documents and passports, as well as home-based tools and equipment used for generating livelihoods for Baha’is who have previously faced the forced closure of businesses and shops.

The confiscated items of value, often equivalent to hundreds or even thousands of US dollars, and often comprising all of their life’s savings, are rarely returned to the owners. This amounts to state-sponsored theft. Confiscating work-related tools and property deeds is clearly aimed at further impoverishing and demoralizing the Baha’i community within what is already a dire economic situation for most citizens across the country.

The last 18 months have also seen a recurrence of rural land confiscations and property destruction by the Iranian government, with irrigated and valuable farmlands confiscated, homes demolished, and families displaced.

University-age Baha’is have long been denied entry into universities or institutes of higher learning. But a disturbing new feature emerged in the current academic year: students were asked to sign declarations denying the authority of their religious institutions in order to be granted entry into university. The government’s declaration form is worded in such a way as to be a recantation of faith through denial of one of the basic tenets of Baha’i belief.

A conspicuous increase in hate speech against Baha’is has also been recently observed in Iran. The key players in this propaganda are state news agencies, especially those directly linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Supreme Leader, and their propagandists, on social media platforms such as X and Telegram, from Friday prayer Imams, by an Iranian conspiracy theory group, and from other individuals backed by government organizations. Hateful material against Baha’is accuse them of being behind the recent protests, of promoting permissiveness, of being against Islam and Shiism, being spies for Israel and the West, and being part of a political movement that seeks to undermine the state.

Denial of burial rights and citizenship rights

Another trend is the progressive erosion of Baha’i burial rights and actions by the Iranian government attempting to seize control of Baha’i cemeteries in a number of locations across the country. The Baha’i cemetery in the city of Arak, which had been in use for 120 years, was recently placed up for auction without the permission of the Baha’is and even as Baha’is themselves were prevented from re-purchasing it from the authority that confiscated it in the first place. The Baha’i cemetery in Karaj was fenced off by the authorities and a process is underway for the authorities to take control of its management. And the management of the Baha’i cemetery in Tehran has been forcibly taken over by agents of the Ministry of Intelligence, in coordination with the authority for Muslim cemeteries, or Behesht-e-Zahra. Baha’is formerly involved in its supervision have been detained and jailed. The new management has subsequently carried out several forced burials of deceased Baha’is in the absence of family members and without observing Baha’i burial rights—and has frequently denied Baha’is entry to the cemetery to visit the graves of loved ones. The agents have, meanwhile, buried deceased Baha’is in the area known as the Khavaran mass grave, the site of the burial of between 5,000 to 8,000 political prisoners and prisoners of conscience executed by the Islamic Republic during the 1980s. Burying Baha’is in this site appears to be an attempt by the government to progressively eliminate the memory of the mass grave by replacing it with a Baha’i cemetery. The move is against the expressed wishes of the Baha’i community out of respect for the families of those buried in the mass grave.

The final trend observed by the Baha’i International Community is the progressive erosion of Baha’i civil rights under the law—particularly with respect to the registration and recognition of Baha’i marriages. Previously, Baha’i marriages were registered in a physical registry by notaries and a marriage certificate was then issued. But more recently, the Iranian government has introduced an online digital registry system which does not provide an option for registrants to select “Baha’i” or “other” as their religion in the religious affiliation data entry field. Any application that does not include information in this field is invalid. This has serious implications for the registration of a marriage itself, rendering it impossible, with the couple thereafter legally considered as being in an unrecognized de facto relationship. And this, in turn, has serious implications for any subsequent registrations of births and other social rights.

Our Story Is One

But the Iranian government’s anti-Baha’i narrative finds less and less acceptance in Iranian society. The Baha’i International Community has been heartened to see public opinion shift over the past several years in Iran; today, many of their fellow citizens see the Baha’is in Iran as an integral and positive part of Iran’s diverse family. Meanwhile, the persecution they have suffered for 44 years is coming to be understood as the same oppressive treatment that is now being inflicted on Iranians of all backgrounds. Iran’s government is failing in its efforts to drive a wedge between Baha’is and their compatriots—making it all the more desperate and brutal in its efforts to stigmatize and suppress the Baha’i community.

A recent case in Isfahan—following the arrest of 10 innocent Baha’i women—saw intelligence agents go from house to house to harass and pressure neighbors and associates of these Baha’is to lodge formal complaints against them. A few individuals did so, with great reluctance and under duress; yet later, some of them apologized to the Baha’is for accusations they were forced to take by the security services. The Iranian government is trying to fabricate evidence in their campaign against the Baha’is merely for public consumption—given that their legal system does not appear to require any evidence, even fabricated evidence, to convict Baha’i defendants.

The groundswell of support for Iran’s Baha’i community—from Iranians of all backgrounds inside and outside the country—is reflected in the thousands of contributions pouring in to the ongoing #OurStoryIsOne campaign. The Baha’i International Community launched this campaign in June 2023 to commemorate 40 years since the execution of 10 Baha’i women in Shiraz, and to signal its support for equality and justice for all. Countless Iranians and others have responded. Our story is theirs; their story is ours.

A European strategy for the elderly: The irreplaceable role of community life

A European strategy for the elderly: The irreplaceable role of community life

A statement of the Baha'i International Community to the conference on the  present and future of European policy on elderly people.
 
Brussels—29 November 2023

The development of a new European strategy on elderly people is an opportunity to recognise the myriad ways elderly people continue to contribute to their societies, and to identify core conceptions and approaches that can further enhance their capacity to do so. Framing the strategy in this way will ensure that the narrative around ageing societies transcends conceptualization of the elderly as a burden on strained pension and healthcare systems. Furthermore, while the strategy should address the important recurrent theme of overcoming loneliness and societal isolation among elderly people, it should also acknowledge that societies are in great need of the wealth of knowledge, experience and wisdom of older generations—alongside younger ones—to pave constructive paths forward in the face of mounting social challenges.

Fostering a strong pattern of community life at the local level

Addressing the above considerations will require the development of vibrant patterns of community life, and a re-examination of cultural conceptions of who we are as a society and how we ought to relate to one another. In addressing the question of who we are, more attention ought to be given to the community as an entity in its own right—alongside the individual and the institutions of society—and to its role in nurturing a sense of meaningful connection and belonging.

Promoting meaningful relationships

One crucial component of strengthening patterns of community life are meaningful bonds between individuals and families. Where these can be forged, elderly people—along with their neighbours—feel an integral part of a network of mutual support and reciprocity, where they not only have someone to rely on, but know that others depend on them, too. This vision goes beyond creating an industry of professional care, important as this may be, to considering how a culture of caring for others can be woven into the fabric of society. The strategy could give thought, for instance, to how institutions such as municipalities, schools, religious institutions, community centres, arts organisations, or health promotion entities can help foster or tap into existing encounters among residents and create processes where they can work together in meaningful ways for the betterment of their communities that they themselves identify. 

Strengthening intergenerational collaboration

A flourishing community is also one which is intergenerational in nature and avoids treating elderly populations as a group separated from the rest of society. On the one hand, a society that embraces every individual—regardless of their age or other factors—must be founded on the conviction that every generation can contribute to the well-being and progress of all. On the other hand, there is a great diversity of circumstances among individuals who would be considered ‘elderly’, and as such, they cannot be treated as a homogenous group. Thought therefore needs to be given to how intergenerational bonds can be strengthened throughout society, beginning at the grassroots of community life. For example, how can the elderly act as a source of experience and wisdom for younger generations? How can children and youth be of service to the elderly? How can spaces be created that foster connections between different generations?   

Seeing elderly people as protagonists of community life

A sense of loneliness and isolation can set in when an individual is no longer regarded as having something of worth to contribute to others, as though the productive part of life is now spent. And yet, the desire to contribute meaningfully to society, to have a purpose beyond one’s own needs, does not disappear because one has reached retirement age. Broadening a conceptualisation of what it means to contribute to society—beyond narrowly attributing this to remunerated employment—is thus fundamental to appreciating elderly people as protagonists of community life. 

From this perspective, while it is critical to meet the specific care, resource, and health needs of elderly people, it is important not to reduce them to these needs. Even in the face of physical limitations, older members of society contribute to their communities in a myriad of ways. Furthermore, continued physical and mental activity not only improves health and well-being, it allows the wealth of knowledge and experience that this population has accumulated over their lifetimes to be harnessed for the common good. 

Conclusion

 

There is a need for conversations, at all levels of society, about what the concept of “community” entails and how it can be built at the grassroots. Such conversations should be inclusive and enriched by a diversity of viewpoints, drawing insights from the many populations that have made Europe their home and whose perspectives will be invaluable in addressing this fundamental question.

A long life expectancy is a strength of European society, thanks to advances in material prosperity. Alongside this material progress, the new strategy is an opportunity for Europe to rethink the fabric of European society, to address the root causes that underpin isolation and loneliness as they are manifested across all segments of society, and to offer channels through which the innate desire within people of all ages to contribute meaningfully to their society can find practical expression.

The situation of the Baha'is in Yemen

The situation of the Baha'is in Yemen

A statement made to the HRC54 on the situation of the Baha'is in Yemen. (Agenda Item 10)

Geneva—11 October 2023

Mr. Vice-President,

Over 130 days have passed since the detention of 9 Yemeni Baha’is, including women, who have been forcibly disappeared and denied access to lawyers or due process. In May 2023, armed Houthis with semi-automatic weapons raided a peaceful Baha'i gathering,  detaining 17 Baha’is, including five women. So far, only eight individuals have been released. The Baha'is in Yemen want the best for their country, and should be allowed to gather peacefully. 

The detained Baha'is, especially two women, have faced intense pressure from Houthi security to recant their beliefs and sign documents that prohibit their religious practice, both of which they resisted—in a clear demonstration of religious persecution.

This assault aims to terrorize Yemeni Baha’is and plant fears of reprisals that could threaten the Baha’i community’s existence. 

Mr. Vice-President, 

Seven UN Security Council members, including Albania, Brazil, France, Malta, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States, called for the immediate release of the Yemeni Baha’is and protection of their religious freedoms by the de facto authorities. We seek continued  international support to urge the Houthis to release the detained Baha’is immediately and without delay.

This Council session will be adopting a resolution on Yemen. To convey the International community’s disapproval of the Houthis behavior, it must explicitly include a reference to freedom of religion or belief and mention the rights of the Baha’is by name.

Baha’i International Community statement at the Warsaw Human Dimension conference plenary on freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief

Baha’i International Community statement at the Warsaw Human Dimension conference plenary on freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief

Intervention to the 4th plenary session of the 2023 Warsaw Human Dimension Conference on Fundamental freedoms: “Freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief; Freedom of assembly and association; National human rights institutions”. A conference organised by the 2023 OSCE Chairpersonship, with the support of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), which focuses on human rights and fundamental freedoms within the OSCE region.

 
Warsaw—6 October 2023

Thank you Madam Moderator. Your Excellencies, distinguished guests, my name is Sina Varaei from the Brussels Office of the Baha’i International Community, which represents the worldwide Bahá’í community to the European Institutions. I would like to take this opportunity to highlight a few elements and lines of action.

The first point relates to freedom of conscience, religion or belief, and its importance to the flourishing of a society. Human beings are not only economic and social creatures, they are endowed with free will and it is through ensuring freedom of religion or belief that they can express their innate capacity to search for meaning and truth.

My second point concerns the importance of interreligious endeavours. If we wish to uproot misconceptions and prejudice, it is crucial to go beyond merely coexisting side by side and engaging in occasional dialogue with each other. How can we nurture deep bonds of friendship and cordial collaboration between religious communities? Today, in increasingly diverse societies, these aspirations for more peaceful surroundings cannot be realised unless they are pursued jointly by faith communities. 

We also need to acknowledge the power of narratives: how do we think about each other? How do we talk about each other? And how can we avoid all forms and nuances of “othering” parts of the population or particular religious groups? This “othering” can be subtle, and even unconscious, affecting language, tone and attitudes adopted in policy-making. 

Religious leaders also have a powerful role but it is far from enough for them to simply make condemnations or appeals for mutual tolerance. We need to think: what narratives are helpful, and which ones do not foster true friendship among different religious group? How can we move from repeatedly highlighting differences in doctrines, rituals or legal codes to gaining a deeper understanding of what unites different religions and aspirations? 

That brings me to my last point, and one of the keys to a better rooted freedom of conscience: education. What efforts are needed at the level of education to appreciate religious diversity as a wealth, to engage with members of other beliefs with humility and eradicate conceptions - however subtle - that can give the impression of being superior to other believers. In brief, educational systems must foster recognition that different religious communities have valuable insights to gain from each other.

Pages

Subscribe to English