English

Fundamental Freedoms

Fundamental Freedoms

Warsaw Human Dimension Conference 2024

Plenary Session VII: Fundamental Freedoms II, including:

- National human rights institutions

- Freedom of assembly and association

- Freedom of religion or belief

 
Warsaw—7 October 2024

Thank you Madam Moderator, your Excellencies, distinguished guests. My name is Sina Varaei, from the Brussels Office of the Bahá’í International Community, which represents the worldwide Bahá’í community to the European Institutions. I would like to highlight some actionable insights concerning the advancement of freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief; which, beyond being a fundamental right, is an essential prerequisite for the flourishing of human potential, and the progress and well-being of society as a whole. 

Upholding Freedom of Religion or Belief goes beyond mere legal and policy considerations, it requires addressing the root causes of religious prejudice and calls for a broader shift in attitudes and practices across all levels of society.

The first area that requires attention is education. How can formal curricula introduce students to the full spectrum of worldviews, beliefs, and religions? What kind of narrative can help us recognise the diversity of perspectives as a wealth? 

Additionally, how can we create informal opportunities for children and youth to engage meaningfully, at the grassroots, with different faith and belief groups, build friendships across communities, and experience religious diversity in their daily lives? When guided to cultivate a humble attitude of learning, children and young people can come to appreciate the valuable insights each religious community offers.

A second area that requires attention is that of interfaith endeavours. Building stronger cohesion and mutual appreciation requires more than occasional dialogue between religious leaders. It involves collaborative efforts that engage not only religious leaders but above all communities and individuals—such as neighbours or parents from various religious backgrounds. By working together on practical projects in areas like education, environmental sustainability, peacebuilding, or community development—to name but a few—, these groups can share their perspectives and actively contribute towards common goals.

What, then, is the role of policymakers in fostering such meaningful interactions? And ultimately, what measures are needed to ensure a narrative that values the diversity of perspectives as a strength while acknowledging our numerous commonalities? 

 

Statement of the Bahá’í International Community at the 57th United Nations Human Rights Council

Statement of the Bahá’í International Community at the 57th United Nations Human Rights Council

Human Rights Council 57th Session: Item 4 General Debate

 
Geneva—25 September 2024
Mr. President, 
 
Yesterday, the Iranian President, Dr. Pezeshkian addressed the UN General Assembly in New York. 
 
But will his words and promises affect the bitter reality for the Baha’i community in Iran, the largest non-Muslim minority in the country? A community persecuted heavily and cruelly for 45 years. The organization, Human Rights Watch, recently determined their treatment of the Baha’is to be a crime against humanity of persecution. 
 
In his first press conference as President, Dr. Pezeshkian spoke of equality for all and that what others worship cannot be insulted. He spoke of mutual respect and dialogue.
 
The reality in Iran, though, vastly differs from these words.
 
Baha’is are arrested only for their beliefs. Their homes are raided. They’re banned from employment. They’re expelled from university. Baha’i women are torn from their children, families left in the dark about their loved ones’ fates. And their beliefs are systematically and constantly insulted in state media.
 
Now, after Dr. Pezeshkian's speach to the UN, we watch to see if his words will align with his actions. 
 
Indeed, the whole world is watching. 
 
Will he be like every other Iranian president before him and make promises never fulfilled? 
 
To show his true commitment, he must remove the many barriers that prevent the Baha’is from living in Iran as equal citizens.
 
We watch and we hope that human dignity will prevail.

Embracing Interdependence: Foundations for a World in Transition

Embracing Interdependence: Foundations for a World in Transition

A statement of the Bahá’í International Community on the occasion of the United Nations Summit of the Future

New York—4 September 2024

“The well-being of mankind, its peace and security,
are unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established.”
– Bahá’í holy writings

On the occasion of the Summit of the Future, the international community faces both a profound opportunity and a vital imperative: the tremendous task of centering humanity’s interdependence at the heart of the global governance system.

The vast strides made since the Second World War, beginning with the formation of the United Nations, represent a significant movement toward a peaceful and prosperous global order. Much like the League of Nations before it, the United Nations, arising from the ashes of global catastrophe, signified the best collective effort of its time in search of real, lasting peace. That the UN continues to be the only multilateral entity able to engage every nation of the world in matters related to global governance is significant. Indeed, its sustained existence reflects a resounding recognition that effective international coordination is a prerequisite for enduring peace and well-being.

Regrettably, the spirit of solidarity—which seemed to be on the rise at the turn of the century when the world’s leaders agreed on a set of global ambitions—is steadily eroding. Progress made over decades is in decline. And the scale and complexity of global challenges rapidly outpace the evolution of the systems designed to respond to them. These distressing trends are in fact symptoms of a deeper ailment facing societies: an inability on the part of the global community to fully embrace the reality that humanity is inextricably interdependent. There is every reason to believe that severe crises will continue to deepen until those responsible for governing world affairs, indeed the generality of humankind, embrace the profound implications of this truth. 

The Summit of the Future thus takes place at a moment when our present trajectory is no longer viable. Hundreds of recommendations for institutional reform have been suggested at this time, each with its own potential benefits. Yet, the needs of the moment call for an even greater task of devising a new conceptual framework, which includes a new set of underlying assumptions, if innovations are ultimately to succeed. 

To this end, in place of offering additional proposals for reform, the Bahá’í International Community invites the arbiters of international affairs, once again, to consider the implications of an alternative central organizing principle—the oneness of humankind. Without full acceptance of this principle, lasting peace and prosperity will remain a distant hope, and even systems of global governance will tend to reinforce division, deepen inequalities, and prioritize the interests of certain groups over the common good of all. It is our belief that placing the oneness of humankind at the heart of international affairs is a necessary prerequisite to stave off further catastrophe and secure lasting peace and harmony. 


A shared story: Identity in an age of transition

To acknowledge the oneness of the human family is not to call for uniformity or to abandon the strengths of many established systems of governance. Rather, it implies that all human beings share an all-encompassing, transcendent identity inclusive of an infinite range of diverse and intersecting cultural and historical expressions. And the age we live in is increasingly one of interconnection and integration, requiring new models of decision-making. 

Instead of recognizing this reality, current systems and structures are deeply embedded within oppositional conceptions of identity that breed mistrust and reinforce competition. Categories of “us” and “them” are deployed in the pursuit of incomplete conceptions of progress, leading to the unjust preferential treatment of one group over another. Although bounded circles of belonging have existed throughout history, circumstances have caused their outer limits to expand over time—from the community, to the city, to the nation—to ensure human survival and flourishing. The transition toward greater degrees of integration has yet to reach its apex. In an age of global interdependence, the forces propelling new forms of interconnection now demand a step never taken before: widening the circle of belonging to transcend any designation of “the other” and to embrace humankind in its entirety, drawing upon its rich diversity as a source of limitless strength. 

In the sphere of international governance, divisions based on bounded conceptions of identity are expressed most clearly through notions of state sovereignty. Key assumptions have long shaped the contours of international governance—that national identities are immutable, that local or national priorities are in competition with global agendas, that the advancement of one segment of the world is to the detriment of another, or that the power of a nation is defined by its ability to dominate and accumulate. Yet absolute national sovereignty is increasingly untenable—whether through the borderless risks of climate change or global pandemics, the capacity of technology to both advance and divide societies, or the challenges and opportunities presented by the movement of people around the world.

A central task before the international community, then, is to devise a new and expanded conception of sovereignty—one that considers how the advantage of the part is best served by the progress of the whole. Such a redefinition would encourage both a legitimate concern for one’s country as well as for the well-being of all of humankind, recognizing that as timelines are extended further into the future, the interests of the individual, the community, the nation, and the world are increasingly aligned. And, far from threatening diversity or entrenching homogeneity, it would reconcile the strength and beauty that comes with embracing particular identities within a greater sense of shared belonging. 

These efforts will also need to be accompanied by the development of a shared vision of humanity’s future. While history is replete with injustice, competition, and crisis, these are not the only features that define our current order. Examples of solidarity, compassion, and hope have also propelled advancement, even amidst societal turbulence. This fuller historical perspective is important in contextualizing our collective trajectory as it allows new foundations based on a longer term perspective to be laid. Any action taken today must, therefore, both learn from the shortcomings of our past and utilize constructive expressions of the human spirit. 

“It is through love for all people, and by subordinating lesser loyalties to the best interests of humankind, that the unity of the world can be realized and the infinite expressions of human diversity find their highest fulfilment.”
– The Universal House of Justice, world governing body of the Bahá’í Faith

A shared path: The principle of justice in recasting relationships

Recognizing humanity’s oneness has vast implications on the way individuals and nations relate to one another and with the planet. In a world where violence, selfishness, and antagonism are largely viewed as reflections of our human nature, one might ask, how can a future characterized by greater degrees of integration and coexistence come about? 

What is needed is a candid acknowledgement that these baser forms of behavior have not only been normalized, but also rewarded at the expense of higher conceptions of humanity which are often undervalued—the inherent capacity to love, to show compassion, to make sacrifices in support of a greater cause, to forgive. The tendency to encourage patterns of behavior based primarily on negative expressions of human nature, however, has resulted in mounting degrees of prejudice, conflict, and extreme inequality, as well as the unbounded exploitation of the earth’s resources.

Reconceptualizing human nature is no simple task, but it can have a profound impact on the relationships that sustain society. Take, for example, dominant approaches to justice which typically seek accountability and retribution as their primary objective. While evidently holding merit in specific contexts, these approaches cannot be the end of the analysis in an interdependent world, for they can have the effect of breeding vengeance, reinforcing division, or stoking mistrust and resentment. Conceptions of justice must therefore begin to include the important task of bringing about unity and well-being. 

What might an expanded conception of justice look like in practice? In the field of economics—in an age where there are sufficient material means for every individual—justice should call us to reevaluate the distribution of resources through a broader lens of human dignity, rights, and well-being rather than competition and accumulation. This requires a deeper questioning of the assumption that individuals are solely self-interested. Ultimately, narrowly materialistic theories and systems of measurement that reward unsustainable and exploitative patterns of behavior will need to give way to new economic arrangements that take into consideration issues of sufficiency together with social, environmental, and spiritual dimensions of human existence. 

Questioning underlying assumptions through the lens of expanded notions of justice would also need to be applied to other areas of existence—peace and security, youth and future generations, science and technology, gender equality, and global governance, to name a few. For if portions of the world continue to prioritize their own short-term flourishing at the expense of others, an imbalance will eventually cause those nations—and humanity in its entirety—to face the inevitable consequences of that injustice. Confronting these and other similar questions will allow the international community to overcome deadlock and to work toward devising and implementing constructive and enduring solutions. 

“The purpose of justice is the appearance of unity…. The organization of the world and the tranquility of mankind depend upon it.” 
– Bahá’í holy writings

A shared responsibility: Leadership that transforms words into deeds

Embracing interdependence and humanity’s oneness holds important implications for the way leaders take decisions at all levels, especially on the global stage. The challenges of our time are well-known. And while numerous foundational international instruments, such as the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, have been accepted by fair-minded individuals and nations alike, they struggle to find full expression in the lived realities of people and communities around the world. 

Scientific evidence, long-term economic projections, and moral imperatives, for example, all provide compelling reasons for urgent effort toward climate mitigation and adaptation. Scores of international agreements, the Paris Agreement chief among them, commit nations to take certain steps. Yet these actions are still to be implemented sufficiently. This contradiction between aspiration and action is a common feature of the international arena, whether in the domain of peace and security, poverty alleviation, or the advancement of women, among others. The tendency toward skepticism and caution that prevents meaningful and enduring action is understandable when set against a painful history of countless breaches of trust. But the state of the world and humanity’s growing interconnectedness demand movement from words to deeds. The role of leadership, then, goes beyond asserting what should be done, to creating an enabling environment where the necessary actions can be taken.

Leaders must overcome this paralysis of will, ultimately rooted in a narrow understanding of individual and collective purpose. To counteract the inertia of the status quo, individual leaders will need to employ new forms of statecraft founded on greater degrees of unity. When considering any proposed policy or action on the international stage, leaders, then, are called on to ask: will this decision advance the good of humankind in its entirety? 

While such a path requires courage, it is a matter of pragmatic necessity that will, no doubt, yield countless benefits. The peoples of the world yearn for leaders and institutions that will take action to address their most pressing concerns. Those leaders will be met with even greater support if they are also able to exhibit integrity and trustworthiness, uphold commitments, act with impartiality, and direct political and economic affairs with wisdom and justice. In reality, history has demonstrated that humanity will ultimately rally around and honor those who arise to prioritize its collective well-being. 

“True civilization will unfurl its banner in the midmost heart of the world whenever a certain number of its distinguished and high-minded sovereigns—the shining exemplars of devotion and determination—shall, for the good and happiness of all mankind, arise, with firm resolve and clear vision, to establish the Cause of Universal Peace.”
– Bahá’í holy writings

A shared framework: Laying a foundation for transformation

The ideas offered thus far outline a common framework founded on the unreserved acceptance of humanity’s interdependence. While many assert the values at the heart of this framework, its effective application is often challenged as unrealistic. What would this look like in practice?

For its part, the worldwide Bahá’í community, together with friends, colleagues, and citizens from every walk of life, have been gaining experience around how to promote peaceful and prosperous societies through the application of this framework, with evidence of notable and constructive transformation in individual lives, community dynamics, and institutional arrangements. Taking shape in virtually every country and region of the world, these efforts are guided and supported by institutional arrangements from the local to the international level. Such arrangements enable the generation and dissemination of insights and best practices across the globe, which have been widely adopted and implemented according to local circumstances. 

Many of the initiatives carried out by Bahá’í communities begin with the creation of consultative spaces in villages or neighborhoods that invite members of their societies, irrespective of background or belief, to better understand their material and social reality, and devise appropriate responses to the challenges they face. On numerous occasions, these spaces have given rise to short term social and economic development initiatives, such as educational campaigns, health projects, environmental awareness actions, or humanitarian assistance efforts.

Over time, many of these efforts draw increased local or national support through an ongoing process of consultation on the application of this shared framework. Some initiatives gradually assume greater degrees of complexity including, but not limited to, projects aimed at teacher-training and literacy, women’s empowerment, food security, social cohesion, as well as artistic expressions to inspire action. Notably, this transformative process has resulted in the proliferation of discrete development initiatives—from 400 to 200,000 in over 180 nations and territories within the last decade—as local populations build the capacities and qualities needed to sustain long-term progress.

In practice, these communities have seen that embracing humanity’s oneness holds a wide range of implications on the manner in which they approach societal progress—that adversarial approaches to problem-solving, no matter how noble the cause they support, are limited in achieving enduring transformation; that differences of opinion are an opportunity to explore values and strategies from diverse perspectives; that every member of society has the capacity, right, and responsibility to contribute to the common good; and that a hopeful future is within reach, through conscious and dedicated effort. 

The lessons learned from these experiences which unfold within a culturally responsive and inclusive common framework are profound. Commitment to principles is far from a naive aspiration. It strikes a resonant chord among populations, and fosters the creation of unified communities of action that can contribute effectively to a global vision. The task at hand is, indeed, achievable; if steps toward a new conceptual framework are taken, millions around the world are prepared to support and encourage its advancement.

“We must now highly resolve to arise and lay hold of all those instrumentalities that promote the peace and well-being and happiness, the knowledge, culture and industry, the dignity, value and station, of the entire human race.”
– Bahá’í holy writings

***

Humanity arrives at a seminal moment of hope and potential. Through a collective act of will, the foundations for a better world can and must be laid in order to avoid further catastrophe. 

For some, the prospect of reconfiguring present arrangements based on noble ideals such as unity and justice might appear idealistic, even ill-timed given the state of the world. Yet to suggest that this shift is better suited for another day fails to recognize that current approaches to global governance themselves are in fact breeding many of the ailments plaguing the world. These will only continue to escalate if not addressed in new ways.

To this end, the Bahá’í International Community invites participants at the Summit of the Future, and the processes that follow, to join together in a profound, collective act of learning. Rather than continue to hold on to outworn concepts and unworkable assumptions, leaders, together with the peoples of the world, must arise, and with resolute will, consult together in search of appropriate solutions. Laying unshakeable foundations upon which our future can be built is a collective challenge. It is the next chapter in our shared story toward a just and harmonious future.

In the Vanguard: The Role of Youth in an Ever-Advancing Global Society

In the Vanguard: The Role of Youth in an Ever-Advancing Global Society

A statement of the Bahá’í International Community

New York—10 July 2024

“In the young people of the world … lies a reservoir of capacity to transform society waiting to be tapped.”

~ The Universal House of Justice, world governing body of the Bahá’í Faith

 

In the young people of the world lies a vast reservoir of capacity to advance the constructive transformation of society. Experience has consistently demonstrated that the desire to bring about positive change and the ability to render meaningful service to the common good are characteristic of the period of youth, irrespective of background or personal circumstance. 

In places where this potential has been recognized and conditions created to release it, new patterns of interaction have begun to emerge between generations. This has opened space for youth to take their rightful place in carrying forward the good work of those who came before them. They have similarly taken up the vital service of mentoring those younger than themselves in devoting their precious energies to social progress and transformation.

To speak of “youth” conjures a range of sometimes divergent conceptions—a constituency to be engaged, for example, a thematic area to be addressed, a demographic category to be quantified or even commodified. “Youth” also refers to a period inherent in the human lifecycle, distinguished by particular qualities and capabilities, on the one hand, and unique opportunities to shape the future, on the other. 

From this latter perspective, the work at hand is not to assert the importance of young people over other populations. Rather, it is to draw as fully as possible on the potentialities of this stage of life, for the betterment of all. “The point isn’t necessarily to create a youth movement,” said one young person from Brazil. “The point is for young people to be at the heart of an everybody movement.” 

Recognition of the vital contributions to be made by young people is growing at the United Nations and, more broadly, within the multilateral system of international organizations and processes. This can be seen in both small shifts and larger structural advances, such as the launch of the United Nations Secretary-General’s Youth Envoy’s Office in 2013 or the creation of the United Nations Youth Office in 2022. 

Alongside these advances, a still more profound rethinking of the attitudes and assumptions related to the period of youth will be needed if greater masses of the world’s young people are to contribute their full share in devising solutions to humanity’s most pressing challenges.  Before young and old alike, then, rises a critical need and an unparalleled opportunity: undertaking a widespread exploration of the role to be played by young people in the advancement and transformation of society. 

Coherence between global and local: Drawing upon youth at every level 

“What the generality of a society’s young people do or don’t do shapes the way its elements are organized, the way its communities function, the progress it is able to make, or not. In very real ways, the future possibilities open to any population depend on how its young people view the role of their generation in society and what purpose shapes their individual and collective actions.” 

~ a young person from Jordan, who supports youth development efforts throughout the Middle East

While often lauded as the promise of the future, youth are also frequently framed as a looming threat—of mischief, protest, violence—or a potential problem to be solved. Fundamental contradictions thus emerge around the way young people are conceived and the role they are to play in society. Such contradictions are detrimental to youth themselves, but also to the communities and institutions that shape and are shaped by them. 

The United Nations could benefit far more from the vital qualities young people possess: their altruism and acute sense of justice, their vitality and vigor, their flexibility of mind and creativity, their desire to contribute to the construction of a better world. Acknowledgement of these capacities abounds. Yet the multilateral system tends to silo young people’s engagement around certain issues alone rather than broader societal challenges; to structure opportunities for participation in ways that are more symbolic than substantive; to place youth in demanding situations without the necessary training or support. 

Overcoming these patterns will require fundamental changes in how young people are understood, viewed, treated, educated, and supported—both within intergovernmental institutions, but also within societies and local communities. Meaningful change at the international level is dependent on parallel processes of transformation at the local level. 

The vast majority of the world’s billion-plus young people will make their first and most immediate contributions to the common good by improving conditions in their local environment. It is within their own neighborhood or village that most will acquire the experience, capacities, and attitudes on which subsequent efforts to shape society at the national or international levels will be founded. 

Of critical importance is leaders and policymakers at the United Nations developing an increasingly detailed vision of the role youth can play in advancing robust processes of social transformation. For theirs is the responsibility to foster the environment, through national and international policy, that allows such transformation to emerge. 

Building capacity at scale: Youth engagement and a path of organic development

“The way that a community views youth is a reflection of the community itself. If the community has no vision of itself, no sense of direction, then youth will be seen as a menace, a source of crime, and so on. But if there is a sense of future in the community, a sense of direction and progress, then young people are seen as resources. They are seen as the energy that is going to move the community toward its destination.”

~ a young person from Zambia, who supports youth-focused social action efforts across Southern Africa

To overcome the many challenges facing humanity—establishing sustainable relationships with the natural world, for example, or eliminating extremes of wealth and poverty—the international community needs capable young leaders not by the tens and dozens but by the hundreds of thousands. 

Doing so systematically, year after year, calls for a deep shift in paradigm—from one focused primarily at the level of the individual to one working with groups and whole communities. How do entire populations—and not just small numbers of exceptionally motivated or connected individuals—come to function as effective actors shaping their societies’ development? And what is the distinctive role that youth, alongside other populations, can play?

These are questions that the worldwide Bahá’í community has explored through a range of community-based initiatives, some of which have gradually grown in scope and impact. One program for the moral empowerment of young adolescents, for example, serves some 300,000 young people in 35,000 neighborhood- and village-based groups, in 180 countries. A network of 330 national and regional training institutes, dedicated to developing capacities central to the advancement of civilization, has enabled youth and adults together to sustain several hundred thousand community-building activities at any given time. These welcome the participation of some two million of their neighbors, friends, family members, and co-workers. 

Such figures are undeniably modest when compared to the overall population of cities and nations. Nevertheless, places that have built the capacity to sustain thousands of community-building activities in a relatively small geographic area offer a window into possibilities that emerge when growing segments of a population arise in coordinated action to advance the common good. Voices from youth and young adults involved with these efforts are heard throughout this document. 

Endeavors that grow in scale and impact, particularly those that prove sustainable over time, consistently begin as smaller initiatives characterized by certain qualities. These include individuals’ ability to develop new capacities and learn, to explain the significance of their efforts and inspire others to become active supporters, to accommodate and coordinate growing levels of complexity. Often initially sustained by a core group of just a few dedicated individuals, such efforts begin on a modest scale and grow as capacity within the local population develops. 

Service of this kind is not necessarily glamorous. Setbacks are not uncommon, and—working household to household and family to family—even successes are often numerically limited, at least in early stages. Yet when sustained over time, such efforts can exercise significant influence on the larger population. Indeed, it can inspire multitudes to arise in action, thereby impacting broader patterns of culture and behavior. As one young person who works with networks of youth across the Indian subcontinent commented: 

“Youth coming together and undertaking small constructive projects for the development of the community have drawn people together, people of many different backgrounds. In this way, these small groups of youth become the glue of the community. They become the catalyst that inspires adults to also take action.”

‘Like light to the youth’: Convictions that sustain commitment

“It can sometimes feel lonely, working for change. Youth have taken a lot of strength from being connected to a core of other young people who share similar convictions and are making similar efforts. Having peers to talk through struggles with and explore common questions has allowed them to know that they aren’t alone, and to build connections that sustain them in times of need. The gatherings in our neighborhood have seen a lot of tears, but also many, many joys.”

~ a young person from Australia, who works with youth in both the school system and community-based initiatives 

Training has been foundational to the initiatives described above. Such training might well include elements of basic skills, technical capacities, or particular bodies of knowledge. Yet countless young people look to their societies and, aside from economic challenges and material hardships, they also see standards of basic decency waning and capacity for good-faith dialogue ebbing. They see leaders and institutions of all kinds discredited by corruption and inadequacy. They see notions of right and wrong, truth and falsehood, increasingly dismissed as irrelevant in favor of the pursuit of self-interest and the struggle for power. And they are convinced that no amount of material or technological advancement will make up for the absence of trustworthiness and honesty, generosity and camaraderie, commitment to truth and a sense of responsibility. 

Qualities of character such as these are the building blocks of a stable social order. For this reason, young people’s ability to better their communities has been greatly enhanced by programs that assist them to apply constructive moral and ethical principles, in action, to advance both personal growth and social transformation. Participation in training of this kind has assisted youth to protect themselves against forces that would manipulate their sense of identity according to the vested interests of others: for example, those that would define them primarily as consumers to be satiated, voters to be persuaded, or viewers to be entertained. 

Such programs have similarly helped young people hold and deepen convictions about the kind of individuals they can become and the kind of societies they can call into being—convictions that a peaceful and just world is possible, for example, that deep change for the betterment of society can be consciously advanced, that the capacity for nobility is inherent in the human spirit. The practical application of such ideals is explored through study of educational materials, discussion of key concepts, and practical acts of service. Understanding is refined through ongoing processes of consultation, where those involved can hold differing views without falling into animosity and disagree while still collaborating to find points of consensus. 

To acknowledge the importance of building capacity is not to suggest that youth are lacking or fundamentally dependent on those who are older. To the contrary, youth themselves have, in many cases, provided the lion’s share of the support described above. Thousands of young people have acted as volunteer teachers, tutors, facilitators, mentors, and trainers—of children younger than themselves, peers their own age, and adults sometimes decades their senior. The relationship that emerges between youth and training, then, is reciprocal. Young people can benefit from opportunities to develop their innate talents and capacities, just as systems for training often come to rely heavily on the abilities, energy, and vision of youth. 

If the objectives above seem, on first consideration, overly philosophical, experience has shown just the opposite. When assisted to explore issues of moral purpose over time and at depth, youth have demonstrated far greater capacity to overcome setbacks with resilience, to remain free from cynicism and bitterness in the face of adversity, and to protect hope and maintain a spirit of joy even in times of difficulty. Such qualities allow young people to sustain efforts for social change, not just for a year or two, but over the course of an entire lifetime. “Certain concepts become like light to the youth,” said one young person who works with youth across the Democratic Republic of the Congo:

“The idea that you are here for a particular purpose, that this purpose is to develop yourself and contribute to the development of your community—these principles become a light that shines on every aspect of a young person’s life. It helps them navigate life and understand challenges and difficult social conditions.”

Ordering the affairs of humanity: Youth and the multilateral system

“What is our understanding of the significance of the period of youth in the life of society? What unique roles and responsibilities do they have in building vibrant and socially cohesive communities? What kinds of communal and institutional spaces help young people shoulder their share in the transformation of society?” 

~ a young person from Germany, reflecting on work with youth and their families across Europe

In few arenas are the contributions of capable youth more needed than in ordering the affairs of humanity more effectively and coherently at the international level. Less attached to the systems of the status quo, which they had little role in establishing, young people tend to have more imaginative space to conceptualize alternatives to present-day realities and work to bring them into being. But how is the United Nations and its associated agencies to best draw on strengths of this kind? 

This question is often answered in terms of amplifying voices and providing access. Numerous decision-making spaces would undoubtedly benefit from greater numbers of young people. Yet the needs of the moment will not be met merely by introducing young voices into “old” systems. Rather, entirely new models of organization, communication, and governance are needed. 

Young people have enormous capacity to develop such models, both among themselves and through interactions with other generations. “We can't always point fingers when things are not working well, or only give recommendations to others,” said one young person who is involved in a variety of youth networks and coalitions at the United Nations. “Each of us is responsible, in our own spheres of influence, to make a contribution that is inclusive, empowering, and unifying.” 

Numerous young people on the international stage are well aware of the need and the power of continually refining their own functioning. In a recent series of gatherings for youth within the United Nations system, for instance, young social actors themselves identified the need to be listening and learning from one another and from the lessons generated by past generations, as much as promoting their own plans and projects. They noted the importance of avoiding the excesses of a culture of celebrity, including preoccupation with visibility, following, profile, and buzz, which tend to elevate a select few while tacitly disempowering many others. And they emphasized that youth-focused spaces need to constantly include new representatives and voices, and not be allowed to collapse down to a small circle of “regulars.” 

Without dismissing the significant impact that young people can have through their own networks, coalitions, and initiatives, it must also be acknowledged that international organizations and spaces often engage youth primarily as attendees rather than protagonists. Significant reform of those spaces will therefore require the partnership of those, often at more advanced points in their career, who hold positions of power and influence. 

Many youth-focused reforms have been proposed by various actors, from establishing a permanent Commission on Youth, to improving integration of youth delegates into United Nations processes, to Member States’ formulating national youth policies and consultative bodies. Such proposals are best understood not as ends in themselves, but rather as means to achieve more overarching objectives—for example, ensuring that policy-making processes are informed by a rich and intergenerational variety of perspectives. 

Knowledge and insights, to give a further example, need to be shared from those with more experience in a given area to those with less. How is this to be accomplished, more and more effectively, within the United Nations? Support of this kind might well follow traditional patterns of young people drawing on older colleagues with more experience. Yet understanding and age are not intrinsically linked. Systems of assistance must therefore be ready to accommodate cases in which it is younger people who represent the reservoir of practical experience, and older colleagues who are in need of assistance. In such cases, those associates would need to be prepared to listen, learn, and grow in light of new realities, as youth themselves are often required to do. 

Passage to maturity: Youth and the path ahead

Today’s generation of youth inherits a world undergoing change and turmoil in ways never before witnessed. Humanity has never held more power to shape the physical world on planetary scales, for example, yet climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental pollution pose existential threats. Digital technologies are evolving at a pace scarcely imagined even in recent years, opening vast possibilities but adding further uncertainty to a world already destabilized by gross inequalities, growing polarization, and social fragmentation. 

The world order that emerged when the United Nations was founded has brought great advances, its clear limitations and inequities notwithstanding. That order, though, is teetering now and needs to be both renewed and improved. The turbulence and commotion of contemporary life is indicative of systems and structures, inherited from the past, that have proven themselves ill-prepared to address the demands of the future. Humanity is thus being challenged to leave behind ways and habits that have ceased to meet its needs and to equip itself for an age whose challenges and opportunities increasingly demand the wisdom and responsibility of maturity. 

In a parallel process of coming of age themselves, young people have a crucial part to play in helping humanity navigate this tumultuous passage to maturity. Youth should no more be romanticized than any other group, and they are far from monolithic. Yet young people have repeatedly proven their readiness to take on a significant measure of responsibility for the well-being of those around them and for the advancement of their societies. Numerous forces, destructive and distracting, can act as obstacles. But these are, at most, only able to obscure the phenomenal potential of youth, never destroy it. 

The shifts needed for humanity to advance to its next stage of development are civilizational in scale and scope. Meeting their demands will require vast exertions on the part of every people and population—youth not least among them. Unleashing the full capacities of each generation of young people, then, is a pressing concern for all. How is the period of youth, brimming with possibility, to play its fullest role in the great endeavor of bringing about an ever-advancing global society? The perspectives offered above, drawn from the experience of local communities around the world, start to shed light on questions of this kind. Let us continue learning together. 

“Youth … are once more summoned to the vanguard of a movement aimed at nothing less than the transformation of the world.”

~ The Universal House of Justice, world governing body of the Bahá’í Faith

Joint statement by Members of Parliament and Senators across Europe on the situation of the Baha’is in Iran

Joint statement by Members of Parliament and Senators across Europe on the situation of the Baha’is in Iran

Brussels—27 June 2024

In light of the alarming targeting of women in Iran, we, Members of Parliament and Senators from across Europe, express our profound dismay at an escalation in the attacks against Baha’i women who face dual persecution, as women and as Baha’is. 

The recent surge in attacks against Baha'i women is evidenced by the fact that they currently comprise two-thirds of Baha’i prisoners. Additionally, 72 out of the 93 Baha'is summoned to court since early March are women. This escalation is utterly unacceptable and represents a distressing trend of hostilities against a community that has faced systematic persecution since 1979, a repression that Human Rights Watch, in their recent report The Boot on My Neck, has stated amounts to the crime against humanity of persecution.

We urgently call upon the Iranian authorities to immediately halt the persecution of Baha'is, release all Baha'i prisoners, and ensure the protection of their full spectrum of human rights. These rights include the rights to liberty, employment, freedom of association and expression, property, education, and the right of burial. These fundamental rights must be upheld without any form of discrimination or prejudice.

 

Signatory Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators:

Teslem Ándala Ubbi, MP, Spain

Karl-Arthur Arlamovsky, MP, Austria

Petra Bayr, MP, Austria

Júlia Boada Danés, MP, Spain

Aitor Esteban Bravo, MP Spain

Meri Disoski, MP, Austria

Ondrej Dostal, MP, Slovakia

Helmut Brandstätter, MP, Austria

Maros Caučík,MP, Slovakia

Cathal Crowe, MP, Ireland

Faika El-Nagashi, MP, Austria

Martin Engelberg, MP, Austria

Ewa Ernst-Dziedzic, MP, Austria

Mona Fagerås, MP, Norway

Aurora Floridia, Senator, Italy

Peter Heidt, MP, Germany

Hans Stefan Hintner, MP, Austria

Zora Jaurova,MP, Slovakia

Beáta Jurík,MP, Slovakia

Kadir Kasirga, MP, Sweden

Farah Karimi, MP, Netherlands

Stefan Kiss,MP, Slovakia

Dana Kleinert, MP, Slovakia

Ingrid Kosová,MP, Slovakia

Stephanie Krisper, MP, Austria

Gudrun Kugler, MP, Austria

Robert Laimer, MP, Austria

Francesca La Marca, Senator, Italy

Vladimir Ledecky, MP, Slovakia

Max Lucks, MP, Germany

Vladimira Marcinkova, MP, Slovakia

František Mikloško, MP, Slovakia

Paul Murphy, MP, Ireland

Ged Nash, MP, Ireland

Joe O’Brien, MP, Ireland

Federica Onori, MP, Italy

Pauline O'Reilly, Senator, Ireland

Marco Padovani, MP, Italy

Simona Petrík,MP, Slovakia

Lucia Plaváková,MP, Slovakia

Ondrej Prostredník,MP, Slovakia

Lia Quartapelle Procopio, MP, Italy

Michel Reimon, MP, Austria

Michal Sabo,MP, Slovakia

Agustin Santos Maraver, MP, Spain

Werner Saxinger, MP, Austria

Franck Schwabe, MP, Germany

Brid Smith, MP, Ireland

Luigi Spagnolli, Senator, Italy

Ivan Štefunko,MP, Slovakia

Harald Troch, MP, Austria

Caspar Veldkamp, MP, Netherlands

Violet-Anne Wynne, MP, Ireland

Situation of the Baha'is in Iran

Situation of the Baha'is in Iran

Statement read at the 11th Meeting of the 56th Regular Session of Human Rights Council

Geneva—25 June 2024

Madame Special Rapporteur, 

Imagine living in a country where a teenager, with all the hopes and anticipation of a youth is told you cannot go to university because of your beliefs. 

This is exactly what happens in Iran. 

Baha’is, the largest religious minority in the country, are banned from university because of their faith. Their history and teachings are grotesquely distorted in school textbooks, students are punished if they speak up in defense of their faith.  

Last year, Iran even forced Baha’is to sign a mandatory declaration form, making them choose between the principles of their faith and going to university. In 2020, a government policy document asked that Baha’is be “rigorously controlled” and that “efforts be made to identify Baha’i students”. Two other documents in 1991 and 2006 still set the Iran’s policy on the Baha’is, explicitly stating that “Baha’is should be expelled from university.”

In February, agents raided a home where a group of young Baha’is had gathered to informally study together, beating the youth and arresting them. 

Madame Special Rapporteur, 

Is this not cultural apartheid, indeed cultural cleansing against an entire population only for their beliefs? This repugnant policy that excludes Iran’s young citizens from higher education because of their faith, preventing them from following their dreams and aspirations, should be rescinded. 

We ask you to strongly condemn Iran’s blatant abuses of human rights and request that Baha’i youth be allowed to enter university immediately.

The Future of Agriculture in the European Union: Some Considerations

The Future of Agriculture in the European Union: Some Considerations

Brussels—24 June 2024

The Baha'i International Community appreciates the questions being raised by the conclusions on the future of agriculture in the European Union, which are set to be adopted during today’s Agriculture and Fisheries Council.

Given the centrality of agriculture to humanity’s future, the need to revise critical aspects of current food systems will only grow in the years ahead. Whether these aspects pertain to various stages of the food supply chain, the allocation of land, or mechanisms for controlling food prices, effective reforms to food systems must be framed by broader considerations.

The Baha'i International Community believes that these broader considerations, including those highlighted below, are essential to a more sustainable, equitable, and resilient future for agriculture.

The future of agriculture in Europe in light of the oneness of humanity

The overarching principle that should underpin any conversation on agriculture is the oneness of humanity. Agriculture and food systems have global ramifications and are interwoven with international trade, environmental policies, and economic dynamics. Decisions made within Europe regarding the agricultural sector have significant impacts globally, just as agricultural policies and practices implemented elsewhere have effects on European food systems.

Recognition of this interconnectedness does not diminish the critical importance of examining, for instance, the extent to which Europe should strive for self-sufficiency or prioritise locally grown products, nor does it lessen the necessity of rethinking international trade to minimise ecological impact. Rather, it requires that such decisions must be made with a deep understanding and appreciation of the broader global context. It is essential to recognize that, in the long term, the prosperity and sustainability of the agricultural sector worldwide are vital for the future of agriculture and farmers in Europe too.

The need to consider the agricultural well-being of the global community is not merely a strategic imperative, but above all a moral one. Indeed, this moral imperative is particularly pressing for Europe, given its pivotal role in the global economic and financial order.

Justice as a guiding principle

Unless and until a framework of just relationships among nations can be established, the fabric of global society will continue to experience disruptions and crises with far-reaching ramifications for all countries involved. In the arena of food systems, one of the numerous implications of the principle of justice is that trade is carried out in a manner that is fair and beneficial to all, and importantly, does not result in any one country or region becoming overly dependent on another. Efforts must be made so that every country - not only those privileged in the existing economic order - can work towards food sovereignty, ensure its resilience to ecological, economic, or other pressures, and maintain the ability to make independent decisions.

Revisiting assumptions related to economic systems

One overarching feature of current economic systems is the assumption that competition and the relentless pursuit of growth are inherent to material well-being. This assumption shapes agricultural systems in ways which promote harmful incentives and leave farmers struggling with seemingly incompatible objectives, such as environmental protection and economic security.

Conversations about agriculture should therefore investigate alternative societal and economic models that align with all of humanity’s needs.

Farmers at the heart of shaping agricultural policy and food systems

One of the predominant themes emerging from recent discussions on agriculture is the pervasive sense of powerlessness felt by many farmers. This sentiment is especially acute among small-scale farmers, who often find themselves at the mercy of various economic, social, and environmental forces, and who face immense pressure from external factors, including the market and the supply chains.

In such complex and challenging circumstances, farmers struggle to maintain autonomy over their production processes and to make decisions that best suit their unique reality and the needs of the environment. This leads to overarching questions: how can the needs of European farmers engaged in all scales of production become central to agricultural deliberations and policy-making? And how can these needs be aligned with the interests of the worldwide farming community, as well as global ecosystems?

A new generation of farmers

Addressing the challenge of an ageing farming population necessitates adjustments across many policy sectors. It especially requires ensuring that farming is an economically viable and desirable prospect. While there is much to be said, we wish to highlight the role of education in particular.

Central to raising a new generation of farmers is an educational system that emphasises the nobility of farming and that encourages youth to apply their intellectual and scientific capabilities towards the development of new, sustainable and context-appropriate technologies. Importantly, education should link the choice to become a farmer with a higher purpose and a vision for social change. Young people are often motivated by the desire to make a positive impact on the world. By framing farming as a pathway to apply one’s intellect and creativity to, for example, reverse biodiversity loss, prevent environmental degradation or eliminate social inequities, the aspirations of youth can be aligned with the needs of our agricultural systems.

A global and cross-disciplinary conversation

The complex nature of agriculture's future, as highlighted by the various aspects mentioned above, underscores the necessity for continued and substantive dialogue among actors from various policy sectors. Such a dialogue should encompass participants from the grassroots level to policymakers, extending beyond occasional events and especially beyond European perspectives.

It is particularly crucial to explore creative avenues through which Europe can better understand the reality of the agricultural sector beyond its borders, in particular by engaging meaningfully with agricultural and other relevant stakeholders worldwide.

Such ongoing engagement will enable the integration of diverse perspectives, facilitate continuous reassessment of policies, and support the gradual refinement of a collective vision for the future of global agriculture.

Statement from the Africa-Europe Joint Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM) on key issues in the AU-EU Partnership

Statement from the Africa-Europe Joint Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM) on key issues in the AU-EU Partnership

Addis Ababa and Brussels—8 April 2024

A flourishing partnership between Africa and Europe can be founded only on the fundamental principle that humanity is one. This implies that the prosperity and well-being of one continent is inextricably bound up with the welfare of the other. While many endorse this proposition in principle, reshaping structures and relationships between both continents according to the reality of global interdependence will require sustained and sincere effort. The Africa-Europe relationship is often described as a partnership, but the existing relationship does not yet reflect this ideal. Many of today’s economic and political systems were created at a time when the primacy of one part of the world was considered a basic fact. Further, European geopolitical objectives and the economic interests of large multinational companies continue to weigh heavily on the relationship. 

Overcoming the complex effects of this reality will require that the voices of those most affected by decisions be placed at the core of the relationship. It will also require resisting the tendency for any one region of the world to consider itself a model for others to follow. Policy frameworks which largely associate prosperity and success with, for example, the experience of urbanisation and industrialisation in the global North will need to be re-evaluated. A meaningful partnership, then, requires the recognition that both continents are on a common path of learning, with neither having perfected a paradigm of prosperity that is sustainable and furthers global justice. These principles will have implications for all areas of policy, requiring attention to the root causes of problems, not just their superficial symptoms. In this connection below we outline several specific areas that require attention, in which the contributions of civil society can bring value to and strengthen the relationship between the African Union and European Union. 

Governance, Peace and Multilateralism

The need to focus on root causes is particularly relevant in the domain of governance and security. A fundamental value, deeply entrenched in both African and European civil societies and young people, is respect for human life and dignity. We note with deep concern the growing prevalence of violent conflict in different parts of the world. Governance arrangements, from constitutional structures to practical policies, must seek to protect human rights, and respect the rule of law, both domestically and internationally. Existing instruments to tackle conflicts, such as the African Peace and Security Architecture, must be better utilised in support of these aims. Further, it is imperative that youth, women and persons with disabilities are systematically included in conflict prevention, peace mediation, peace building, diplomacy efforts, as outlined in Resolutions 2250, 1325, 2475 of the United Nations, and the EU’s Youth Action Plan. 

The absence of adequate social protection and public services, and a lack of educational and employment opportunities, contribute to distrust towards governments and create fertile ground for the spread of extremist ideologies and terrorism. In addition to providing such services and opportunities, the EU, AU and Member States should prioritise proactive efforts to promote social cohesion and prevent conflict in inclusive, participatory and trust-based partnerships with civil society and communities themselves. 

Effective multilateral governance, and efforts to promote peace and well-being, will require spaces that allow a variety of African and European actors to engage jointly at different levels, spaces in which an open and rich conversation about respective experiences, needs, challenges, and opportunities can unfold. The proposed AU-EU Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM) is one such space that can perform a convening function, facilitating interaction and engagement between actors on both continents. It is especially important that those at the grassroots have opportunities to engage with institutions at various levels, to ensure that policy and strategy made at the intercontinental level promotes joint priorities, that flagship initiatives resonate with local realities and possible existing solutions, and that no one is left behind. 

Food Systems and Rural Transformation

Fulfilling the right to food for all requires just, sustainable and resilient food systems that are defined by people, rooted in food sovereignty, and shaped by planetary boundaries. The foundation for such systems already exists, in the family-based, territorially embedded, small-scale, diversified food provisioning modalities that feed the majority of the world’s people, especially in Africa. However, their potential is held back by the dominance of a corporate and industrial, globalised food provisioning model, which receives disproportionate political attention and support. 

Redesigning food systems in ways that promote shared prosperity and ecological balance will require supporting democratic policy decision-making rooted in a human rights framework by enacting the proposed Civil Society Engagement Mechanism (CSEM), reinforcing the role of the UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS) and respecting international rights-based frameworks such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants. 

We call for: shifting financing towards the agroecological transition and reducing African dependency on food imports by prioritising EU investments and funding for peasant agroecological food production and developing modalities for channelling funding directly to small-scale producers through their organisations; defending peasant seeds and people’s access to and control over land; protecting territorial food markets from imports that undercut local products; prohibiting the production and export of highly hazardous pesticides and promoting bio-fertiliser production; applying a gender lens to all food and agriculture activities and investments and, ensuring that EU policies and practices do not undermine food and nutrition security in any partner countries, particularly policies in areas of debt, climate, trade, agriculture and fishery policies and corporate due diligence. 

Climate and Energy

The climate, environmental and biodiversity crises are global but the impacts are local. Addressing climate change and environmental degradation requires that the advancement of the global common good be approached as a primary objective, one no less important than securing national or regional interests. The EU and AU must meet and go beyond international commitments to prevent the worst impacts of climate change. Leaders and policymakers in Africa and Europe are confronted with a critical question in considering the merits of any proposed action on climate and energy, be it national or international: will a decision advance the good of the population in both continents, and indeed the whole world? 

Finding integrated solutions that reduce dependence on fossil fuels, promote climate adaptation, protect biodiversity, and embrace a just transition for all will require inclusive decision-making processes that involve affected communities and stress the connection between environmental sustainability and social equity. Closer engagement with the grassroots, including through the proposed CSEM, will allow for a more thorough understanding of the impact of policies adopted in one continent on another. Such engagement is necessary to empower local communities, particularly Indigenous Peoples, CSOs, women and rural populations, so that they can lead on the governance of biodiversity, climate initiatives and their delivery. 

Migration and Mobility

The question of international migration cannot be addressed in isolation from the broader relationship between the two continents. Any framework claiming to address migration cannot shy away from looking at the continuously widening economic disparity existing at the global scale, the generation, distribution and utilisation of wealth, the organisation of the world’s raw materials, or the coordination of markets. After all, it is impossible to minimise the drivers of migration while neglecting to reconsider economic processes that leave some countries with little chance to prosper. European policymakers in particular must reflect on the inadvertent effect of their policies, whether foreign, trade, investment or environmental, on the socio-economic conditions that drive the flow of individuals across borders.. 

Further, it is imperative to reframe the narrative around migrants from one that presents them as a burden or even threat, to one that emphasises the manifold contributions they make to the life of the societies to which they migrate. This principle requires that the African and European Unions work more closely together to enhance migration and mobility cooperation as a legitimate process with high developmental potential, with European policies that are more responsive to African demands, including opening new channels for regular migration. One practical implication of this is the need to review visa regimes which disproportionately burden African citizens. The provision of academic visas, for example, should be reviewed in order to bolster exchange programmes for students, professors, and researchers. Increasing integration between African and European youth through youth networks, associations, and platforms will also help to facilitate cultural exchanges, enhance collaboration and cultivate a sense of global citizenship and responsibility among young people. 

The protection and equitable treatment of those in need, such as refugees and displaced persons, should remain a common priority. In this regard, systems to oversee the work of asylum and border agencies must be strengthened in order to address the unjust and sometimes illegal treatment of individuals attempting to cross borders. The criminalisation of those who act in solidarity with migrants must be avoided. 

Human Development through Health and Education

During the 2022 AU-EU Summit, health emerged as a key political concern, not least in the context of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Health remains fundamental for sustainable development, and it is thus crucial to maintain this focus in the delivery of the Partnership’s commitments. Efforts have been made to boost local production of health products in Africa, but progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has been slow and investments in infrastructure and skilled personnel in the health sector are still desperately needed. Upholding Africa's health sovereignty is paramount, along with promoting a rights-based approach to health, including sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), and gender equality. 

Access to quality and inclusive education at all levels from early childhood, to primary, secondary and higher education, including technical, vocational education and training is equally essential. Steps must urgently be taken to ensure universal access to education, regardless of socio-economic background, ethnic or national origin, gender, or disability. It is also crucial to decolonise education systems to reflect African countries’ unique context, realities, and challenges. Emphasis must be placed on delivering affordable, accessible, high-quality education that equips youth on both continents with the necessary skills and competencies to thrive in and shape a rapidly changing world. Considering current and projected shortages, particularly on the African continent, investing in infrastructure, educators’ training and professional development, salaries and working conditions is of the utmost importance. 

Significant domestic and international investments are needed to strengthen health, public education and social protection systems, including by expanding the fiscal space of African countries through debt relief. 

*** 

The challenges facing the AU-EU partnership are only likely to increase in range and complexity. Embracing the adjustments in thought and action outlined above will facilitate significant steps towards the sincere and mutually beneficial relationship which both partners have called for. 

 

Signatories / Signataires 

– ACT Alliance EU

– ActionAids

– Justice and Dignity for the Women of Sahel 

– Africa Europe Faith Justice Network AEFJN 

– African Women's Development and Communications Network (FEMNET) 

– African Youth Commission

– AfroLeadership 

– All Africa Conference of Churches

– Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA) 

– Bahá´í International Community

– Biodiversity and Biosafety Association of Kenya (BIBA-K)

– Caritas Africa 

– Caritas Europa 

– Centre for Social Impact Studies (CeSIS) 

– CIDSE 

– CONCORD Europe 

– Deutsche Stiftung Weltbevölkerung (DSW) 

– Food and Agricultural Youths Institute of IAAS 

– Independent Continental Youth Advisory Council on AfCFTA (ICOYACA) 

– Network of the Independent Commission for Human Rights in North Africa (CIDH Africa) 

– Observatoire Kisal Bénin 

– One Hour for Europe ITALIA/Youth Intra Dialogue on Europe and Africa (OHFE/Y-IDEA) 

– PELUM Zambia 

– PMU Sweden 

– Red Cross EU 

– Single Mothers Association of Kenya (SMAK) 

– Symposium of Episcopal Conference of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM)

– Syndicat UMT Maroc 

– Tanzania Association of Non-Governmental Organizations TANGO 

– Vienna Institute for International Cooperation and Dialogue (VIDC)

– WaterAid 

– Wetlands International 

– West African Network of Peasants and Agricultural Producers (ROPPA)

– YEWGlobal Foundation 

– Youth Alliance for Leadership and Development in Africa (YALDA)

– Youth Senate Kenya

Statement regarding the Baha’is in Yemen to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

Statement regarding the Baha’is in Yemen to the 55th UN Human Rights Council

40th Meeting - 55th Regular Session of Human Rights Council

Geneva—22 March 2024

Five Yemeni Baha’is are still in detention in Yemen after armed Houthis raided a peaceful Baha’i gathering almost 10 months ago and detained 17 people. They are being held without charge or due process just because of their religion. The Baha’i International Community continues to call for their immediate release.

Along with many other Yemeni Baha'is, the 12 that have been released are under continuous surveillance, jeopardizing their safety and restricting their freedom of movement. The 12 were forced to sign undertakings for their release and then forced into an indoctrination program intended to induce them to recant their Baha’i beliefs.

The sad irony is that the Houthis continue to relentlessly persecute their own people at a time when they try to portray themselves as defenders of the oppressed.

We commend the ongoing efforts of the Special Envoy for Yemen in securing a UN-backed roadmap to end the civil war in Yemen, with the crucial participation of all parties. This process presents a significant opportunity to address the critical issue of discrimination against minorities and to build a united and inclusive society. Ensuring the full participation of all segments of Yemeni society is fundamental to building a lasting peace and fostering the well-being of all Yemenis. The Baha'is of Yemen, along with all others, are striving towards this shared  aspiration of  a more prosperous Yemen.

A European Union Youth Strategy: Some Considerations

A European Union Youth Strategy: Some Considerations

Brussels—22 March 2024

Youth as protagonists of their social environments

Any strategy related to youth must be underpinned by the conviction that they should be protagonists in the process of social change. For youth to realise this potential, other social actors they interact with need to see them in this light, and demonstrate their confidence that youth can arise as agents of change. Youth themselves also need to believe that this potential resides within them. 

However, the social forces that distort how youth see themselves are becoming stronger. Mounting global, national, and local challenges, and the divisive and antagonistic ways such challenges are often approached, can leave many youth feeling powerless in the face of what seem like insurmountable problems. 

And yet, at a time of life when young people wrestle with the fundamental questions of who they are, how they should relate to others, and what their place in the world is, they possess great capacity to reimagine themselves and their society. If adequately supported and encouraged, this natural capacity enables them to become active protagonists of change, not simply passive bystanders in a world being made for them. It is during this crucial moment in life, one of great opportunity and great challenge, that youth will require the wholehearted attention of European policymakers, so that they can help shape the progress of society. 

Broadening the role and purpose of education 

One of the most fundamental conditions for youth to realise their potential as protagonists of social progress is access to empowering educational processes. 

However, narrow conceptions of education and its purpose can limit a young person’s capacity to flourish, to make informed choices about the future, and to meaningfully contribute to society. Educational systems that reduce education to the assimilation of information or the acquisition of technical skills needed to compete in the labour market, conceptualise a young person’s learning trajectory as a ladder to climb at a faster pace than others, promoting harmful pressures and superficial incentives, and can stifle rather than cultivate a thirst for knowledge that propels a fulfilling educational journey. 

If youth are to be protagonists, education must inspire them to use their endowments not only for their own progress, but for the betterment of society as a whole. In this respect, education systems must cultivate the capacity to analyse one’s society—its needs and possibilities for progress—must nurture a sense of moral responsibility towards that society, and must assist young people to explore in both theory and practise how they can use the knowledge gained during their education to address these needs. In this way, young people can come to see engagement in meaningful work, for example, not merely through the lens of self-interest, but as a powerful means to serve society. 

Strengthening community life and intergenerational relationships 

Beyond educational settings, other social spaces in which youth are present have a significant, often overlooked, formative impact on them. A local community that connects diverse individuals and families in a reciprocal web of mutual support, trust, and solidarity, provides another environment in which youth can both develop the capabilities and qualities necessary to contribute to social progress, and at the same time receive support in facing the various struggles on the path to adulthood. 

Intergenerational relationships are a crucial component of community life. Older members of a community can provide advice and encouragement, while regarding youth as capable protagonists whose ideas are to be embraced with open-mindedness. Similarly, nurturing in youth responsibility for the social, intellectual, and moral development of generations younger than themselves, can strengthen their sense of agency and purpose, and inspire them to exemplify high ideals. In turn, the care youth extend to the next generation ensures that rising cohorts of children will have support as they pass through their own adolescent years. 

What this requires is a reimagining of the social relations at the heart of European society, and a collective process of learning on how local communities can be strengthened and the generational fragmentation of society be overcome. 

Fostering youth commitment towards all of humanity 

The many challenges facing humanity cannot be resolved without the understanding that humanity is one, and that the well-being of any segment of the global population is contingent upon the well-being of the whole. Therefore, every dimension of a European strategy for youth must give attention to nurturing conviction in humanity’s essential oneness. Without this, even well-intended efforts to empower youth will fall short of creating the conditions for effective cooperation at the local, national, and international levels that are crucial to addressing the many existential issues confronting humanity. 

Bringing diverse populations together 

Youth have an irreplaceable role to play in devising solutions to all of the challenges facing European society. There is, however, one challenge that warrants their special attention: that of ensuring that the European continent, blessed with cultural, ethnic, and religious diversity, becomes a place where youth and populations of various backgrounds feel they belong and can play a part in shaping its future. 

Youth must be at the vanguard of efforts to build a new set of relationships among diverse populations at the grassroots, grounded in the conviction of the oneness of humanity. Prejudice is perpetuated in social contexts in which individuals merely live side by side without opportunities for meaningful interaction. At the local level, youth can learn to bring diverse individuals together and engage in activities that contribute to the well-being of the entire village or neighbourhood. While youth possess great capacity to convene, they also require sustained encouragement from their communities and institutions, such as municipalities, community centres, and arts, leisure, and sports organisations. 

Participation in consequential decision-making processes 

Treating youth as meaningful protagonists of their social environments also requires their participation in processes and spaces through which consequential decisions are made, particularly those that shape policy. Fostering a culture in which youth feel that their voices are heard and their opinions valued will need to go beyond the establishment of formal mechanisms for youth participation. It will require cultivating a posture of openness and humility towards the creative and sometimes challenging insights that young people will bring to policy discussions. If youth are given such creative space, they will not only be able to contribute to existing policy processes, but can bring fresh ideas to help rethink and reshape current social structures. In this respect, young people should not be regarded merely as the inheritors of existing social systems. 

Youth and well-being 

Younger generations across Europe are experiencing increasing levels of loneliness, isolation, frustration, hopelessness, and lack of self-worth, giving rise to profound concern for their well-being. The relationships, environments, and purposeful contributions to society described above are essential to a young person’s true flourishing and well-being. However, the strength of the forces that breed passivity and distort young people’s sense of self-worth should not be underestimated. Entire industries, for example, are growing ever-more proficient at monopolising the attention and energy of young people with endless entertainment and distractions. 

There is a need to question this course that society has set itself on, and to reflect on the extent to which a young person’s development in today’s world is being compromised by unbridled access to destructive content, carried through the medium of technology. Focused attention is required, including by youth themselves, to the question of how systems for the promotion and regulation of media, technology, and culture can be reshaped towards socially constructive ends.

Pages

Subscribe to English