English

Creating the World Anew: Leaving No One Behind (2019)

Creating the World Anew: Leaving No One Behind (2019)

A Statement of the Bahá’í International Community to the 63rd Session of the Commission on the Status of Women

New York—8 March 2019

At one level, social protection may be conceived of as the set of policies and programs designed to reduce poverty and vulnerability. A theme as weighty as providing social protection to all, particularly the most vulnerable-- the majority of whom are women and children-- must be considered in the light of a greater truth: that all of humanity is one, and all of humanity must benefit from the plentiful resources of our shared homeland. That all people have the right to lead lives of dignity, with opportunities to receive a quality education, to access healthcare, to practice their spiritual values, and to contribute their share to the well-being of their communities, through work, nurturing healthy families, and offering acts of service, should by now be an accepted truth.

Moreover, a clear implication of the oneness of humanity is that women and men are equal. The growing recognition of both oneness and the equality of women and men is a hallmark of the modern age-- and one that augurs well for the gradual emergence of a global civilization characterized by justice, reciprocity, and prosperity. Nevertheless, the full expression of oneness in every facet of life has yet to be realized; indeed, its realization may at times feel out of reach. That women and girls are often the hardest hit by the injustices engendered in the current ordering of society is unsurprising given the historical forces that have given rise to that order. While growing acceptance of the principle of oneness was one of the greatest legacies of the twentieth century, many of the ideological underpinnings of prevalent societal systems are premised on values that are antithetical to oneness. Ideals of exclusion, belief in the inherent superiority of some groups over others, and reliance on adversarialism as a means of achieving progress are coded into the very DNA of the structures of society. What follows, then, is that the principle of oneness cannot be grafted superficially onto these; the systems and structures of society must be remolded to embody oneness.

A critical question before a body as significant as the United Nations and the Member States that comprise it is how to draw on and release the capacities and collective powers of all the world’s peoples, including, critically, women and girls. Beyond institutional implications, principles of oneness and equality call for profound changes at the level of culture. No one is free from the exacting demands of justice; all will be called upon to continuously re-examine their own attitudes, values, and relationships with others.

Addressing Economic Inequalities

As a result of social and cultural norms and inequalities, women experience stages of particular vulnerability throughout their life cycles. In many countries, women are much more likely than men to lose their income and fall into poverty. Even in the most economically advanced communities, women’s reproductive roles have often meant they will not be afforded the same roles and responsibilities in the workforce as their male counterparts. There are many obstacles preventing women and girls from accessing public services and benefiting from strong infrastructure. Governance systems that promote collective security, environmental sustainability, and an equitable and just economic order are required to permanently remove them. Given their centrality to social protection, appropriate economic arrangements deserve special consideration.

Extreme concentrations of wealth have given rise to the distorted perception that the world lacks sufficient resources for all of its inhabitants. When considering how to bring all people out of poverty, there is an understandable temptation to focus on the generation of wealth. Attention to growth and income generation alone has very often translated into more wealth for those who do not need it, and increased deprivation for those who do. Regulatory structures that allow small numbers to amass unconscionable amounts of material resources for themselves and their kin cannot be perpetuated. So long as economic models continue to disregard and externalize moral considerations, such as justice and trustworthiness, global financial instability will continue to rise, and all of humanity will struggle.  

Indeed, around the world the consequences of environmental degradation are being felt. Yet economic paradigms in most industrialized countries treat environmental impact as an externality. This has given rise to the impoverishment of rural communities, the exploitation of vulnerable populations, and the rapid deterioration of the natural world. Promising new models are arising that consider questions of economics in light of planetary boundaries. These models should be investigated to determine their potential as well as their limits. Generally, the global community may wish to devote substantial resources towards understanding how economic models organized around principles of collective trusteeship, justice, and reciprocity can emerge and adapt to the needs of different communities.

Releasing the Powers of the Human Spirit

In communities around the world, a lack of material wealth has been an obstacle to attracting, training and retaining qualified teachers, and to erecting and maintaining educational facilities. Agenda 2030 emphasises strengthening public infrastructure as a means of providing education to all. While quality education does depend, to some degree, on a flow of material resources, the experience of many Baha’i communities at the grassroots suggests that even in the most remote and poverty-stricken areas of the world, there is a wealth of human resources that with time, attention, and the wise channeling of material means, can flourish.

When a community assesses the resources it does possess (for instance, the capacity of local inhabitants to identify challenges and consult upon solutions; the generosity of community members willing to donate time, talent, and materials to construct simple edifices and other provisions) limitations can give way to opportunities. Our experience has shown that initiating an educational process concerned with releasing the full range of human capacities does not need to be delayed until strong infrastructure is in place. A quality education requires attention to the entire educational process-- the training of the teachers, the selection or development of appropriate curricula, the creation of an environment that is conducive to learning, and the engagement of the community within which the learning process unfolds. These different dimensions can be supplemented and strengthened by material resources, to a degree. Yet, even more crucial is ensuring that teachers and students be involved in a process of capacity building that releases the powers of the human spirit.

The human spirit-- which can be regarded in one sense as the collection of endowments that distinguish human beings from other species, including the human mind-- has the capacity to know, to love, and to will. It is a force that has for too long been undervalued, and as such, humanity has been deprived of a limitless source of prosperity. Releasing its powers requires an education that would help children develop the skills and knowledge needed to both transform their characters and lead productive lives. This would include engagement with literature and the arts, scientific training, mastery of technical skills, ability to participate in individual and collective decision-making processes, and developing the capacity to identify needs and consult upon solutions. As their capabilities gradually develop and find expression in the community, there is a burgeoning of those arts, sciences, innovations, philosophies and ethics upon which civilization depends.

Creating the World Anew

The inability to provide social protection for women and girls at every stage of their lives is only one of the symptoms of an outdated social order. This requires that the current order be pushed to its limits through policy change, through the enactment of just legislation, and through measures to close the gaps of extreme inequalities. However, these changes, though necessary, will prove insufficient in bringing about the new patterns of life that will allow all people to thrive. Given that many of the systems and structures of society were designed precisely to reinforce domination and inequality, significant resources must also be channeled towards learning about effective models of governance, education, and economics structured around an entirely new set of principles: that human beings are one, that women and men are equal, that the emergent powers of the collective can be released through cooperation and reciprocity, and that humanity’s progress will be greatly bolstered by the full participation of all people in creating the world anew.

Billions Arising: Releasing the Universal Capacity for Transformative Social Change

Billions Arising: Releasing the Universal Capacity for Transformative Social Change

A statement of the Baha’i International Community to the 57th session of the Commission for Social Development

New York—29 January 2019

Thoughtful actors the world over are striving to construct social and economic arrangements that reflect the reality that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” In this light, the fiscal, wage, and social protection measures being considered by the Commission for Social Development can be understood as incremental means of fostering vibrant communities in which members from all backgrounds are both contributing to and benefitting from the common good. The current global order often encourages self-interest at the expense of the general welfare, venerates extreme accumulations of wealth, and pursues economic gain without regard for the natural environment. At the heart of the work of the Commission, therefore, is the search for means by which governments can bend economic forces toward the straight path of justice and opportunity, regardless of any person’s place of birth or social circumstances.  

To recognize the dignity of some seven billion individuals is to acknowledge a human reality that is truly universal. At the level of principle, there is widespread agreement that humanity constitutes a single people, albeit infinitely diverse in language, history, and cultural expression. Consciousness of this oneness of humankind is, in many ways, the beating heart of the United Nations system itself. Yet social upheaval based in assumptions of difference is apparent on all sides. Arrangements that were designed to support an increasingly interdependent world are being questioned and in some cases abandoned altogether. Unforgiving conceptions of otherness are sweeping populations across the globe and fracturing societies. Social consensus around basic norms is breaking down by the day, as much between coworkers and neighbors as nations and economic blocs.

A vision of the future that unites growing numbers into common cause will be key to addressing structural challenges such as these. Equally important will be the ability to translate that vision into practical realities. Economic arrangements that reduce extremes of wealth and poverty and foster social cohesion will be critical in this regard. At one level, the economic policies under consideration at the Commission have the potential to define a minimum standard below which no individual should be allowed to fall. Such standards seek to ensure that misfortune does not translate into humiliation and setbacks do not compound into calamity. But such policies can also help establish an environment in which capacity is built, in ever-increasing numbers, to contribute to the construction of a better world.

The role of institutions of governance

How might Member States use policy tools to bring about conditions worthy of the highest aspirations of their people? In practice, measures designed to foster social development often assume elements of the donor/recipient relationship, with their attendant pitfalls of paternalism and superiority, from one perspective, and dependency and disempowerment, from another. If these are to be avoided, new patterns of relationship will be needed between local communities, individual citizens, and social institutions. Such systems of relationships would both foster and draw from the widespread involvement of a population in thoughtful consultation on their shared future and meaningful decision-making on ways that it might be brought about. In villages and cities, neighborhoods and in the home, the process thus set in motion would seek to draw on the talents and perspectives of the fullest range of the human family. The role of government would come to focus on enabling and empowering, rather than simply providing and funding. And helping to unlock the transformative power of local communities and individuals would become a defining objective for agencies at all levels.

At stake in this perspective is not just a set of policies, but rather an ongoing process concerned with expanding the bounds of agency and prosperity, both collective and individual.  

The building of capacity in local communities, on the one hand, and the government’s discharge of its rightful duties, on the other, can sometimes be placed in opposition to one another. But this duality ultimately proves false, for some of the most notable instances of rapid progress have sprung from the convergence of enlightened policy and empowered populations. Communities flourish as they develop the capacities - intellectual, social, technical, and moral - to make informed decisions about how their agency will be exercised in ways that both contribute to and are enhanced by state services. For its part, the government’s objective of broad-based social advancement is best served when local populations have the capability and volition to resolve problems on their own. In this light, social and economic policies become vital means for the state to enhance the partnership between itself and the communities it supports and serves.  

What this looks like in practice will vary considerably by context. But many insights will be universal, and the UN is uniquely positioned to facilitate processes of learning at the global level. Means at its disposal include convening spaces devoted to genuine exploration, aggregating experience, and identifying emerging trends and patterns - all free from self-congratulation and promotion. It is well-suited, for example, to help deepen understanding of the process of effective policy-making, rather than the mere search for existing policies to be imitated. Over time, efforts in this direction could provide invaluable insight into the means by which effective policies are generated and implemented - the types of decision-making used to build ownership and commitment, for example, or the types of interaction used to foster close collaboration between actors at different levels.

The UN also has a vital role to play in advancing key areas of learning. How, for example, can the stigma sometimes faced by individuals who rely on social protection programs be reduced? Similarly, under what conditions do various fiscal, wage, and social protection policies contribute to truly cohesive and inclusive societies, versus simply feeding into a collection of well-served but disconnected subpopulations?

Billions of protagonists

Few would disagree that the present moment is one of significant disruption. But the discerning eye can see signs of integration as well as disintegration in the changes accelerating on every side. This suggests a worldwide process of transition and transformation rather than one simply of decay. Patterns of association that have outlived their usefulness are falling away, making room for new forms of collaboration and cooperation. And the space thus created provides a valuable opportunity to explore social and economic arrangements that are suited to humanity’s aspirations for the future, and characterized only by that which is most beneficial from its past.

Global challenges will ultimately require global solutions. Addressing inequality, social fragmentation, and similar ills calls for a notable expansion of consciousness and identity. Also needed will be universal systems that cannot be undermined by picking and choosing between the current patchwork of independent national policies. In taking up this work, one area of ongoing learning must be how fiscal, wage, and social policies can be implemented in ways that recognize the capacity of all populations to contribute to the advancement of humanity. How can global actors go about their work in ways that recognize around them a world filled with billions of protagonists of constructive change? How, in practical terms, will efforts under such a paradigm differ from those undertaken when the generality of humanity was seen primarily through the lens of deprivation and need?

Experience has shown that building societies of equality and inclusion will require stubborn obstacles to be confronted head-on. Formidable indeed are challenges such as the extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of a few; the culture of corruption that often afflicts the wealthy and the powerful, but influences the daily choices of the masses as well; the long-standing forms of prejudice that are boldly reasserting themselves not only in the realm of discourse but also in the formulation of policy and law. Yet experience has also shown the ability of virtually any population to refashion society when inspired by a shared vision of the future and committed to a common course of action. These are dynamics that Member States, as well as UN agencies and civil society organizations can foster in very practical and specific ways - among them the policies being considered by the Commission this year. Let all of us, then, find our role in unlocking the vast potential of an increasingly united and purposeful humanity.

Viewing the movement of populations in the larger context of humanity's collective life

Viewing the movement of populations in the larger context of humanity's collective life

Intergovernmental Conference on the Global Compact for Migration

Marrakech, Morocco—10 December 2018

The movement of populations has, over the centuries, allowed civilisations to come into contact with insights and advances made elsewhere, and enabled entire societies to emerge. Today, it is one of the means by which the bonds between peoples of diverse backgrounds are continuously strengthened and is a key catalyst in the emergence of a world community. In its current form, however, the movement of populations, often prompted solely by the desperate need of individuals to seek a viable future elsewhere, is shedding light on the urgent necessity to revisit  the way in which humanity is organised.

The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration dated 11 July 2018 highlights the need to “Minimize the adverse drivers and structural factors that compel people to leave their country of origin” (Objective 2). In this light, one cannot overemphasise the importance of viewing the movement of populations in the larger context of humanity’s collective life and as yet another symptom of much deeper and far-reaching concerns.

Unprecedented numbers of people around the world have been displaced from their homes, fleeing war, violence and persecution, and a growing number of migrants see themselves with no choice but to leave fragile states, economic deprivation and environmental degradation to search for better lives elsewhere. At the receiving end, these movements have put an enormous strain on some countries who, themselves fragile, are bearing, however ill equipped, the largest share of those displaced. Other countries have also been put under social and political stress, giving way to discourses of fear and prejudice. Governments, swept up in the immediacy of the challenges, feel forced to respond by adopting restrictive policies or by showing leadership through rapid and mostly short-lived responses.

What is becoming increasingly apparent is that those forms of mobility, which are caused by despair and the need to survive, cannot merely be the object of an expedient political or humanitarian solution, nor can they fundamentally be addressed by the adoption of one or the other form of migration policy. The need for a long-term approach, which addresses the underlying causes that give rise to and perpetuate movements, has never been more keenly felt.

Such a long-term approach calls for a far-reaching, multi-dimensional, dispassionate and informed conversation around the issue of migration. That conversation cannot fall short of examining social, political and economic structures, systems and attitudes that underpin and perpetuate the current order. It needs to include a genuine reflection on how this order can be redesigned to ensure an adequate response to the needs of masses of the world’s population living in situations of war, poverty and oppression. Most importantly, it needs to be based on the understanding of the indisputable interconnectedness of our societies, and the reality that humanity’s collective life suffers when any one group thinks of its own well-being in isolation from that of its neighbours.

The implications of the above are extensive and the reasons compelling millions of people to move are manifold and complex. Take poverty for example, just to name one of the drivers of displacement. Any framework claiming to address movements caused by the lack of hope in a viable future, cannot shy away from looking at the continuously widening economic disparity existing at the global scale, the generation, distribution and utilisation of wealth, the organisation of the world’s raw materials, or the coordination of markets. After all, it would not be reasonable to expect to minimise the drivers of migration while neglecting to reconsider economic processes that leave some countries with little chance to prosper.

The state of affairs described above is not just reinforcing global inequality, but also fueling many of the contemporary conflicts that result in millions of refugees and displaced people. One can only imagine the depth and intricacy required of any conversation that would attempt to disentangle the various contributors to war, terrorism, and violence perpetrated in the name of religion. However insuperable this may seem, no serious and responsible attempt to address the situation of refugees can be dissociated from the broader question of how to stem and overcome conflict.

Although these challenges must be addressed collectively by all, the precise nature of the questions facing the different regions of the world will naturally vary. Some must reflect on the inadvertent effect of their policies, whether foreign, trade, investment or environmental, on the socio-economic conditions in the countries of origin. Others must explore how they can eradicate, within their own countries, those habits and patterns which feed conflict, deepen impoverishment, and leave their citizens deprived and prone to negative influences.

As insurmountable and unrealistic as the task of re-examining some of the foundations of our current order might appear to be, if not given due consideration, there is no reason to expect that the undesired aspects of the movement of populations will not take further impetus and become untenable for all regions in the world. The proposition that regions can in one way or another remain unaffected by the arrival of those from elsewhere is an illusion.

The global conversation to which the Global Compact has given rise, and the collective consciousness it is fostering, highlights the nascent ability of the international community to avoid succumbing to the uncritical assertion that the current order cannot be revisited. It provides a promising juncture to look at the movement of populations as intimately connected to the needs of an increasingly interwoven world, and to open the space for a broader consultation on the requirements of a humanity which is inevitably moving towards the next stage of its collective life.

The Equality of Women and Men: Divine Imperative for an Age of Transition

The Equality of Women and Men: Divine Imperative for an Age of Transition

Women’s Assembly: “The Dignity of Women Across the World’s Wisdom Traditions and Society” Parliament of World Religions: “The Promise of Inclusion, The Power of Love: Pursuing Global Understanding, Reconciliation, and Change”

 
Toronto, Canada—31 October 2018
  1. Women and men are inherently equal in capacity and nobility. This conviction is more widely accepted today, setbacks notwithstanding, than in any previous period of human history. Multitudes around the world have concluded that any social order worthy of our aspiration must be one in which women and men are afforded the same opportunities and respect. Through interpretations of scripture and the stirrings of conscience, the findings of science and the needs of society, growing numbers have become convinced that the path stretching out before an ever-advancing civilization leads toward equality. 

  1. For Bahá’ís, the equality of women and men is not simply a sign of rising social consciousness. Rather, it is a divine reality ordained by the One Creator. “Women and men have been and will always be equal in the sight of God,” wrote Baha’u’llah, the Prophet-Founder of the Bahá’í Faith. Such words, central to Bahá’í identity and practice, are first and foremost a call to action. For equality is not the lived reality for vast segments of humanity. In some parts of the world, women face discrimination that is overt and unabashed, enshrined into law and codified into policy. In other parts, greater willingness to pay lip service to the ideal of equality obscures realities that are equally pernicious - a stubborn linking of female worth with sexuality and shallow definitions of physical beauty, for example, or the need to adopt distorted conceptions of male identity to be found acceptable for positions of leadership. 

  1. Inherited norms of what is acceptable between the sexes have been shaken to their foundations in recent years. To take just one example, in business and government, entertainment and sport - and, sadly, in religious institutions as well - incidents of abuse that until recently would have been concealed have been roundly and publicly condemned. This has been captured in popular consciousness by various movements and campaigns that seek to give visibility to experiences that were previously confined to the personal and the private. But such movements are ultimately fueled by something much deeper: the irrepressible desire for respect, dignity, and gender equality to find expression in the institutions and relationships of society. And it is to this longing, legitimate and springing from the depths of the human soul, that we turn our attention today. 

  1. On moral grounds, it is clear that the persistent denial of equality to half the world’s population is an affront to human dignity. But there is also growing recognition of the heavy societal costs and dangers that a population invites by clinging to the ways of oppression and marginalization. When a society refuses to fully draw on the strengths of all segments of its membership, frustration mounts. Signs of unrest grow. And even if a semblance of order is maintained, the social order becomes increasingly fragile and precarious. It is no exaggeration to say that the stability of society rests in large part, today, on the principle of gender equality.

  1. As this principle is vast and its implications numerous, I will limit myself today to exploring three central convictions found within the teachings of Baha’u’llah.

    1. The first is that gender equality is a divine reality, and as such is a prerequisite for progress in all areas of collective life

    2. The second is that humanity is approaching its age of collective maturity, and that inequality of any kind, particularly gender, is a form of prejudice that is incompatible with that maturity.

    3. The third is that religion will be central to generating the commitment and determination needed to bring about a society reflecting true gender equality.  

  1. I will explore these propositions through the history and teachings of the Bahá’í Faith, as well as the experience of Bahá’í communities around the world working to put this  principle into practice. I will also draw from the experience of the Bahá’í International Community United Nations Office, for which I currently serve as the principal representative. 

Gender equality as a divine reality 

  1. Central to our exploration of the principle of the equality of women and men is the proposition, found across the world’s religious systems, that human reality transcends corporeal existence alone. In this light, the equality to be found between some seven billion individuals is not grounded in the physical body or even the attainments of the mind. Rather it is based in that which is eternal and transcendent in human beings. And from this vantage point, what some have called the soul, we can plainly see that neither sex is more or less equipped to elevate the character and foster the well-being of humankind. From here, it becomes apparent that women and men are equally capable of identifying needs, imagining possibilities, and creating new realities. They are equally capable of building capacity within themselves and others to contribute to the common good. They are equally as capable of manifesting the noble qualities of an all-loving creator. 

  1. Consciousness of the innate equality of women and men is incompatible with complacency and passivity. The soul that recognizes gender equality as an expression of the Divine Will is immediately confronted with a host of questions that speak to the very foundations of society. If, for example, we are all equal at the most basic level, how is that equality given expression in the external world? How does it inform the way that we organize our institutions, markets, and relationships? How does it impact our systems of governance, employment, criminal justice, and education? Just as importantly, what are the implications of not infusing our social order with an unshakable commitment to the equality of women and men? Do we believe that failing to do so simply perpetuates a long-standing injustice toward women and girls? Or is it that we, as entire societies, are thwarted, halted, hamstrung, and incapacitated - that we are drained of the ability to advance and prosper together? 

  1. The heights to which humanity can progress are virtually limitless. But this potential cannot be realized by any one group alone, according to its particular preferences and perspectives. Just as a prospering global civilization will not be brought about by, for example, one economic class acting on behalf of another, neither will it be brought about by anything less than a full, and complete partnership between the sexes. The Bahá’í writings explore this theme by likening the world of humanity to a bird possessed of two wings, male and female. “So long as these two wings are not equivalent in strength, the bird will not fly,”  the writings state. But when they become commensurate in strength, and when they enjoy the same prerogatives, the flight of humankind is promised to be “exceedingly lofty and extraordinary.” 

  1. The equality of strength mentioned here suggests the equitable distribution of resources between the sexes, which will be needed in law and policy, as well as at the level of the community, the neighborhood, the family, and the marriage. But the complex dynamics of flight suggest further implications. For humanity to soar, its wings must be coordinated as well as strong. They must be able to act in concert, responding to one another with attention and sensitivity. They must be able to give way or take on burden when circumstances require it. And they must be directed toward the same goal. Otherwise progress will falter.

  1. In striving to put these ideals into practice, is important to recognize that gender equality applies as fully to men as it does to women. The Bahá’í writings state that, “As long as women are prevented from attaining their highest possibilities, so long will men be unable to achieve the greatness which might be theirs”. Within such a framework, men and boys would work for the advancement of women not merely out of a sense of moral obligation but also because their own fate and well-being depend on it. They are incapable of realizing their greatest potential alone. They are dependent on women in ways that are profound and inescapable. But dependence of this kind, expressed through relationships of mutual support and assistance, is a source of great strength, not weakness.Through it, expression is given to the fundamental principle of universal participation in the advancement of society - that the talents of all must be incorporated and celebrated if it is to be said that progress is being made. 

  1. Equality between the sexes is a prerequisite for progress in every area of collective life. How could it be otherwise? The imperatives of this divine truth stop at the bounds of no field or discipline. They exempt no arena of activity from their compelling influence. “Let it be known once more,” the Bahá’í writings state, “that until woman and man recognize and realize equality, social and political progress here or anywhere will not be possible.” In the advancement of education and understanding, the establishment of health and well-being, the abolition of war, the eradication of poverty, the stewardship of the natural world - in the pursuit of all of humanity’s most cherished aspirations, equality between the sexes is a non-negotiable prerequisite.

  1. Far from hyperbole or rhetorical flourish, what is being proposed here is a clear assertion of fact. “Let it be known once more that until woman and man recognize and realize equality, social and political progress here or anywhere will not be possible.” This is a proposition that can be tested and explored. The relationship between gender equality and social progress can be investigated through real life interaction, its elements observed, refined, put into practice. Academic research has a role to play, but this is work that all of us can pursue in our neighborhoods, workplaces, communities, and social circles. Do we believe that progress requires gender equality? Would we be able to articulate why that might be true to someone who did not already believe it? Would we be able to help that person explain to his or her friends why gender equality is indispensable to human advancement? Such questions challenge us all to reassess our understanding of the nature of progress and what will be required - of ourselves and society at large -  to bring it about. 

Gender equality and humanity’s coming of age

  1. The second main point I will touch on concerns the unique potential, as well as the pressing obligations, of the historical moment in which we live. Taken in its entirety, humanity is never static, but ever evolving and progressing. Scientific and technological advancement, for example, has deepened our understanding of the physical environment and expanded our capacity to take advantage of its many forces and laws. Innovations in governance, administration, and communication have allowed society to be organized at increasing levels of size and complexity, thereby expanding the magnitude of collective endeavors that can be undertaken. And developments in the spiritual and moral sphere have extended the bounds of consideration and concern, refined the kinds of conduct that can be considered decent and humane, and elevated the vision of what human beings can and must be together. 

  1. In such developments can be seen the collective maturation, however incremental and painstaking it might sometimes seem, of humanity. Just as an individual passes through periods of infancy, childhood, and adolescence, the human race in its entirety has passed through successive stages of collective development, refining new abilities and facing increasingly complex challenges. This has led to the present moment, in which the the interdependence of the nations of the world has become undeniable and, indeed, irreversible. The story of humanity as a single people in a common global homeland is starting to be told, and systems and structures that were founded on more limited loyalties of the past are beginning to break down, one by one. This transition is not without discomfort. Behind much of the turbulence and commotion of contemporary life can be seen the fits and starts of a humanity struggling to come of age. But these processes of disintegration tend to sweep away barriers and open space for new forms of collaboration and cooperation that draw more fully on the combined capacity of an infinitely diverse humanity. Consciousness of this oneness of humankind is central to the establishment of an integrated global civilization. And in the view of Bahá’ís, it constitutes one of the hallmarks of humanity’s dawning age of maturity. 

  1. This is the context within which Bahá’ís understand work toward gender equality must be pursued. Progress in every age depends on a deep understanding of the realities of that particular period. “Every age hath its own problem,” Baha’u’llah declared, going on to counsel the people of the world that “the remedy the world needeth in its present-day afflictions can never be the same as that which a subsequent age may require.” The equality of women and men is a truth that has existed since the dawn of time. But consciousness of it has been limited throughout the long ages of humanity’s childhood and adolescence. In the past, women were often regarded as an inferior breed, denied the opportunity to express their innate potential, and relegated to the role of serving the needs of men. Such attitudes continue in countless societies, of course. And yet, in the final analysis, they have not been able to withstand the test of time. As understanding of the limitless potentialities of the human spirit has advanced, those who would assert male supremacy through word or deed find no moral or ethical grounds from which to do so. And lacking that, they find themselves compelled to appeal to the basest inclinations of self-interest, greed, and fear. 

  1. What becomes clear is that some of the social forces at work in the world propel the cause of gender equality, while others retard it. Among the latter is unthinking imitation of the past. The appeal to tradition has been used to justify countless forms of injustice, from the denial of education, to exclusion from public life, to the sanctioning of domestic violence. The replication of gender discrimination from generation to generation is a related, but often more subtle and evasive challenge. In this regard, care must be taken not only to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, but also to avoid inventing new and ever-changing expressions of age-old biases. 

  1. Another driver of gender inequality is what might be characterized as superstitions about women. These include the fantastic and the outrageous, which survive in some parts of world. But they also include assertions that seek to clothe themselves in the garb of respectability - claims about women’s ability to lead effectively, to make decisions under pressure, to exercise sound judgment. Follies of this kind must be rooted out of religious expression and cultural practice. But they must also be eradicated in other areas, such as scientific inquiry, where various theories of male supremacy have sought legitimacy in the supposed finding of anatomy or physiology. 

  1. To these must be added the misguided efforts of those who believe their own interests to be advanced by the status quo, and who are guided only by the compass of personal advantage - those who see the subjugation of women for what it is and work to perpetuate it, regardless.

  1. Fueling these and countless other inequities is the spiritual disease of prejudice. The assertion of one’s superiority over his or her neighbor has been the source of incalculable suffering over the course of human history, from ruinous wars to daily acts of indifference and hardness of heart. In earlier ages, limitations in travel and communication obscured the oneness of humankind and reinforced perceptions of otherness. Today, it is not only possible but necessary to see the entire planet and its many inhabitants from one global perspective. Growing awareness of this oneness of the human family has undermined justifications offered in support of prejudices of race, nationality, and ethnicity. So, too, must its implications recast every facet of the relationship between women and men. “Know ye not why We created you all from the same dust?” asks the voice of the Divine, as recorded in the writings of Baha’u’llah. “That no one should exalt himself over the other. Ponder at all times in your hearts how ye were created.” 

  1. The human drive toward unity, unfolding within the context of justice, is one of the most powerful means by which gender discrimination can be eradicated. In the past, recognition of the equality of those previously considered inferior was often driven by external circumstances, such as the shifting lines of political or military power. Today, as humanity prepares to assume the responsibilities of maturity, this work must be undertaken more consciously and intentionally. We must explore, at ever deeper levels, the countless implications of the truth, expressed so long ago, that all human beings are created in the image of God. And as we do, we will both draw from and contribute to those forces of integration and construction that propel the establishment of equality, forces such as the human desire to know and to understand, the universal attraction to that which is beautiful and true, the drive to imagine a better future and commit ourselves to its realization.   

The role of religion in bringing about gender equality

  1. Advancing the cause of gender equality will require countless projects, programs, and campaigns. But efforts to build communities that increasingly reflect the light of equality will also have to concern themselves with those modes of expression and patterns of thought and behavior that characterize a given people. They must, in short, enter the realm of culture. For in the final analysis, many of the questions most central to the emergence of a prospering and equitable global civilization are to be addressed at the level of culture.  

  1. What are the qualities for which girls and women are valued by society? What are the bounds of action and agency accorded to them? What is the range of their capacities understood to be? Questions such as these are woven deeply into the fabric of society. They touch on some of our most foundational beliefs about ourselves and the appropriate ordering of society. And, because such issues are so close to the heart, they can seem almost impervious to change. Yet religion has played this very function time and again throughout history. “Is not the object of every Revelation to effect a transformation in the whole character of mankind,” Baha’u’llah asks, “a transformation that shall manifest itself both outwardly and inwardly, that shall affect both its inner life and external conditions?” 

  1. It must be plainly acknowledged that organized religion has all too often acted as one of the most formidable obstacles to the advancement of women and the establishment of gender equality. Its authority has, to take just one example, been lent to a variety of damaging cultural practices, resulting in countless pure-hearted and faithful women not only suffering the indignity of oppression, but being told that those injustices were the will of God. 

  1. This is a grave betrayal of trust that we, as people of faith and promoters of equality, must neither deny nor excuse. But we also know that, when faithful to the spirit of those transcendent figures that gave the world its great belief systems, religion has been central to the reformation of moral character and the advancement of civilization. In every age, religion has provided the true lens by which people of good will can discern which elements of their culture are aligned with the Divine Will and should be fostered, and which are contrary to human well-being and should be allowed to fall away. It has provided the motivating force needed to shoulder responsibility for making those changes. And it has unlocked the commitment needed to sustain such efforts not just for days or weeks, but over the course of years on end. Indeed, it is through the vivifying waters of religion than many a soul has found the stores of purpose and strength needed to walk a path of service throughout the entirety of a lifetime. 

  1. This brings me to the third main theme I will touch on today - the role to be played by religion and religious communities in bringing about gender equality. Attention is often given to trying to define what religion is, considering structural elements such as texts, authorities, interpretations, and rituals. My focus will be more on what religion does, what it can and must do to advance the position of humanity. In this sense, religion might be understood as a means to awaken and cultivate, at the practical and grassroots level, the high-minded and noble attributes latent in every soul. In this light, religious communities can come to function as communities of practice where spiritual principles such as the equality of women and men are applied thoughtfully to the life of society, for the benefit of all. Within them, a process of capacity building that enables increasing numbers to participate in the transformation of society – and protects and nurtures them – can be set in motion. 

  1. Considerable consensus could be found among those gathered at the Parliament of the World’s Religions around the role to be played by faith in advancing the equality of women and men. Many would mention the centrality of spiritual values, the necessity of personal transformation, the power of prayer and reliance on the divine. Less established is how to foster the widespread and systematic adoption of such values. How do qualities of trustworthiness, generosity, determination, and nobility find expression not just in individual lives but entire populations? What allows a community to take ownership over its own spiritual, social, and intellectual development, and how does this process spread? 

  1. Such questions call for sustained exploration over time. But I can offer a few initial thoughts, drawing from the experience of the worldwide Bahá’í community and my office at the United Nations. The Bahá’í community readily acknowledges that, like all faith communities, it has much to learn about how the ideal of gender equality is translated into social reality. It makes no claim to perfection. At the same time, Bahá’ís work to advance the cause of gender equality in all their endeavors, seeing it as both a sign and prerequisite of social progress. In this regard, its efforts, stretching back more than a century and encompassing virtually every country of the world, comprise a body of experience that is potentially illustrative. And it is in this spirit that I share the following. 

The experience of the Bahá’í community

  1. The patterns of community life that a religious community seeks to build is one area in which commitment to the equality of women and men must find expression. Over the past two decades, the Bahá’í community has devoted significant attention to establishing a decentralized system of training and education that seeks to provide children, adolescents, youth, and adults with the spiritual, moral, and intellectual tools necessary to make lasting contributions to society. Committed to the equality of women and men as an article of faith, Bahá’ís strive to enhance the participation of women and girls in these educational programs at all levels and in all capacities - as students and participants, teachers and tutors, coordinators and directors. As a result, a recent survey of some 62,000 individuals across 39 countries found the ratio of women to men in these efforts to be virtually 50/50. 

  1. These efforts have contributed to enhancing the role of women and changing attitudes in countless villages and neighborhoods. In the Monduli district of Tanzania, for example, as more and more girls have attended Bahá’í-inspired community schools, it has become increasingly common for parents to allow their daughters to continue their studies and get married at a later age. Ongoing conversations about the negative effects of female genital mutilation have also led to a reduction in the percentage of female students being subjected to this practice.

  1. Similar developments have been seen in the Bihar Sharif area of my home country of India. Women in this region have traditionally been under the control of their husbands and families, and not allowed to be active outside the home. The emphasis placed on gender equality in the community-building processes underway, however, has led to thoughtful reassessment of time-worn traditions, and participation of women and girls in community affairs is flourishing. Restrictions on women leaving the home are being left behind and their active participation is becoming the norm. The number of girls receiving education is increasing and the incidence of child marriage is decreasing. The dowry system is also being revised. Previously, the parents of girls often had to sell land or other assets to finance elaborate weddings, which contributed to poverty. Now some participants are opting to waive the dowry and have simple wedding ceremonies that do not burden their parents, thereby contributing to increased economic security.

  1. Growing awareness of one’s capacity to make meaningful change in society naturally finds expression in efforts to address social and economic challenges in one’s community. Religiously-inspired social and economic development projects are therefore another area in which a religious community can further the equality of women and men. One example from Bahá’í efforts is the Barli Development Institute for Rural Women. Established in India in 1985, this organization seeks to empower rural and tribal women to become agents of social change in their communities. The Institute offers a free six-month residential training program to several hundred illiterate or semi-literate women each year, in areas including literacy, moral leadership, nutrition and health, environmental conservation, and income generation. Recognizing that attitudinal change on the part of husbands, parents, children, grassroots leaders, local institutions and other members of the community is equally essential to the process of empowering women, the Institute visits the villages of former participants and conducts conferences, meetings, and short-term courses. More than 8,000 women from approximately 800 villages have thus far taken part in the Institute’s programs.

  1. Commitment to the equality of women and men must also find expression within a religious community’s own administrative processes and institutional structures. Indispensable in this regard is tracking the participation of women through data and statistics. This is an area to which the Bahá’í community devotes significant attention, and from which I can share a few brief examples. 

  1. As some might know, the Bahá’í Faith has no clergy or professional clerical class. Instead, the affairs of the Bahá’í community are overseen by democratically elected governing councils operating at various levels. In every country, for example, local communities are guided by what are known as National Spiritual Assemblies. Women currently represent more than half of those holding the position of Assembly Secretary, a role that has been described as the institution’s “Chief Executive Officer”. 

  1. The rate at which women have served in this capacity, as well as other leadership roles including Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and Treasurer, has nearly doubled since the 1980s. Similar growth has been seen in women’s overall membership on National Assemblies, which today is approaching parity, worldwide. These figures have risen as understanding of the implications of gender equality as a spiritual principle has deepened, and local Bahá’í communities have worked to free themselves from inherited biases against the female sex. 

  1. Developments such as these hold several lessons we can consider together. One is that they demonstrate the great value of religious communities tracking, objectively and quantitatively, the progress gender equality is making within their own internal activities and systems of governance. Such developments also highlight the evolutionary nature of progress toward the equality of women and men. The aim is not that one or another religious community is suddenly free, as if by magic, of the countless forms of prejudice against women that are still perpetuated by societies around the world today. The goal, rather, is that they are working, consciously and diligently, to uproot those prejudices and replace them with ever more profound manifestations of equality. 

  1. Another means by which religious communities can advance gender equality is by participating in the prevalent discourses of society. This is central to the work of the Bahá’í International Community’s United Nations Office, which seeks to contribute to thought and policy at the international level. Such contribution can take a variety of forms. At the conceptual level, the Office was central in establishing concern for the girl child as a distinct thread within the overall discourse on the advancement of women, particularly in the landmark 4th World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995.

  1. In the area of transforming institutional structures, the Office’s principal representative co-facilitated the UN’s Gender Equality Architecture Reform campaign. This effort culminated in the creation of UN WOMEN, a centralized body that incorporated functions previously undertaken by four separate UN agencies, thereby greatly strengthening the capacity of the UN to contribute to the advancement of gender equality around the world. 

  1. The Bahá’í International Community has also sought to contribute to the gender discourse by convening spaces for actors of different types to engage in constructive dialogue. An example of this is the Faith and Feminism Working Group to the United Nations. This had its origins in a series of public conversations, organized by the Office, which explored the challenges, opportunities, and inequalities that women face at various points in the life cycle. As the series drew both feminists and faith actors - whose viewpoints and agendas do not always coincide - two UN agencies requested the Office to convene and house what became the Faith and Feminism group. This process was not always an easy one. But our intention was to provide a platform from which all could constructively explore issues of common concern. 

A new social order

  1. In these examples I hope to have given a glimpse of ways that religious communities might strive to translate the principle of the equality of women and men into reality. I have shared the Bahá’í perspective that the full and unqualified equality of women and men is a divine reality, ordained by God. I have suggested that the vast potential of this equality has laid latent through most of human history, but is becoming accessible today, as humanity gradually leaves behind the ways of childhood and begins to embrace the powers of its dawning maturity. I have proposed that prejudices that have long hampered the collective life of humanity are becoming untenable and must be abandoned in both obvious and subtle forms. And I have asserted that, in the present stage of human history, the complete equality of women and men is a prerequisite for progress in every area of collective life. 

  1. Creating a society that embodies gender equality at all levels is an endeavor of social construction on previously unimagined scales. The world has never built such a society, and no individual, group, nation, or leader knows what it would look like. No people can claim to know that path in its entirety. Nor is any region without contributions to make toward its achievement. "Soon will the present day Order be rolled up, and a new one spread out in its stead,” are the words of Baha’u’llah, speaking to the magnitude of change that lies before humanity. 

  1. Challenges will be many in constructing that social order. But the tools at our disposal, those spiritual capacities and resources which the founders of the world’s great religious systems bequeathed to humanity, are powerful indeed. The Parliament of the World’s Religions has been exploring these tools for over a century - in general, but also in the creation of new forms of being and doing that conduce to the advancement of women. Dr. Eliza Sunderland, representing the Unitarian Women of America at the World Parliament and Columbian Exposition Women’s Congress in 1893, provides just one example. In her Parliament speech, Dr. Sunderland called for an evolutionary view of religion in understanding more fully the bond of union between the human and the divine. Speaking of her own faith tradition’s capacity to change and grow, she expressed her trust that Christianity might become an ideal “large enough to include all peoples, tender enough to comfort all, lofty enough to inspire all." 

  1. Bahá’ís see the construction of truly equitable and unified societies as a labor that will necessarily stretch centuries into the future. But they also see that future as bright beyond compare. I would like to close, then, with a passage from the Bahá’í writings that speaks to the possibilities ahead for women and men alike:

  1. “In this Revelation...women will go neck and neck with men. In no movement will they be left behind. Their rights with men are equal in degree. They will enter all the administrative branches of politics. They will attain in all such a degree as will be considered the very highest station of the world of humanity and will take part in all affairs. Rest ye assured. Do ye not look upon the present conditions; in the not far distant future the world of women will become all-refulgent and all-glorious.”  

  1. For this, the passage concludes, is the Will of God for humanity today.  

Interactive Dialogue on Yemen

Interactive Dialogue on Yemen

UN Human Rights Council – 39th Session, September 2018

Item 10: Interactive Dialogue on Yemen

Geneva—26 September 2018

Mr. President,

Only a few days ago, on 15 September, over 20 members of the Bahá’í community in Yemen, including all of its national-level leaders, were indicted at a court hearing in Houthi-controlled Sana’a. The hearing began with only the judge, the prosecutor, and other court officials present; neither the Bahá’ís being charged nor their lawyers were informed of the court session. The next hearing is scheduled for 29 September, to which the judge has summoned those absent from the first court session, among them women and a teenage girl.

They have been spuriously accused, under various absurd pretexts, of espionage and apostasy—crimes which carry the death penalty.

Mr. President,

In its recent report, the Group of Eminent Experts presented its findings concerning the dire situation of the Bahá’í community. It refers to the arbitrary detention of Bahá’ís purely on the basis of religious beliefs, the rampant violations of due process, the promotion of a propaganda campaign by the leader of the Houthis to incite hatred against the Bahá’ís, and, in January of this year, the sentencing of a Bahá’í to death based on charges similar to those being levelled against the Bahá’ís just days ago. Moreover, the Group of Experts states that even its request to visit the imprisoned Bahá’ís has been denied.

All of the foregoing confirms that the Houthis’ plan to decimate this religious community continues unabated. In fact, there are clear signs that they are accelerating and intensifying their efforts. What is even more worrying is that the manner in which the Houthis are targeting the Bahá’í community is eerily reminiscent of the persecution of Bahá’ís in Iran in the 1980s during which leaders of the Bahá’í community were summarily rounded up and killed. In short, there is every reason to be concerned about the immediate safety of the Bahá’í community in Yemen.

Mr. President,

Our question to the Group of Eminent Expert is this: Given the present circumstances, what means can be pursued for the Houthis to abandon their escalating campaign of religious persecution?

UN Human Rights Council – 39th Session, September

UN Human Rights Council – 39th Session, September

Item 4: Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention

Geneva—18 September 2018

Mr. President,

As we speak, students around the world, including in the Islamic Republic of Iran, are beginning a new academic year. Sadly, however, Iran’s Bahá’í youth may once again be denied their fundamental right to higher education. This is a severe human rights violation to which generation after generation of Bahá’ís have been subjected.  

This exclusion of Bahá’ís from higher education is but one facet of the systematic policy of the Iranian government to eradicate the community as a viable entity. Another is its impoverishment: for nearly 40 years, Bahá’ís have been barred from working in the public sector and severely restricted in the private sector. A further step of this plan is now taking place before our eyes, as small businesses owned by Bahá’ís are shut down and sealed by provincial authorities, striving to deprive them of their remaining means of earning a decent living.

The community also remains under pressure through raids on homes by agents of the Ministry of Intelligence where Bahá’ís are often arbitrarily arrested and detained and their personal items are confiscated. Approximately 60 Bahá’ís are currently imprisoned throughout Iran solely because of their religious beliefs. Bahá’í cemeteries continue to be desecrated and incitement to hatred through state media continues unabated.

Mr. President,

This is the bleak picture of a situation that has been going on for too long. We call on the international community once again to urge Iran to live up to its commitments and obligations under international and domestic law to cease this grave persecution.

Migration: A Chance to Reflect on Global Well-Being

Migration: A Chance to Reflect on Global Well-Being

For the Sixth Intergovernmental Negotiations on the Global Compact for Migration

Geneva—12 July 2018

In the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants and the Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework, Member States recognize that “millions of refugees around the world [...] have no access to timely and durable solutions” and that “the success of the search for solutions depends in large measure to resolute and sustained international cooperation”. They further commit “to address the root causes” of violence and other crisis situations which continue to drive people to flee their homeland. In this relation, we would like to offer two thoughts for consideration.

Present national-level structures can no longer hope to adequately respond to the issue of mass migration in an increasingly globalized world. The challenges attending current national efforts to address the issue clearly illustrates this point. The consultations on the Global Compact for Refugees, the Global Compact for Migration and other such processes show a growing recognition that resolving the crisis requires the development of structures able to address the situation globally, through the collaboration and participation of all regions and countries involved. In fact, mass migration has challenged us to look beyond the nation state, to perceive the world from a global perspective and has heightened our awareness of the interconnectedness of humanity. Indeed, “in a world of interdependent peoples and nations the advantage of the part is best to be reached by the advantage of the whole”.1

Secondly, the current dire humanitarian situation calls for a profound, dispassionate and collective reflection on the underlying conditions that have caused the mass movement of populations. The unprecedented displacement of millions of people globally cannot only be viewed in terms of “managing migration”. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the ongoing suffering of countless individuals who risk their lives for greater security is yet another symptom of a much deeper and far-reaching concern. It represents an urgent imperative to reexamine systems, structures, policies and more importantly the attitudes and assumptions that have shaped them.

During the recent UNHCR Annual Consultations with NGOs, the High Commissioner emphasized the need to address the conflicts at the heart of the current refugee and migration crisis. The mass movement of populations has made it clear that the peace, stability and prosperity of different regions of the world are interconnected and that solutions cannot be intelligently considered in isolation from this global reality. Indeed, understanding the root causes of mass migration and displacement and identifying durable solutions for the myriads of crises causing people to flee their homes deserve the highest attention of the international community. For if not through the identification and creation of lasting solutions, how else can we hope to prevent the situation from deteriorating even further?

1. Shoghi Effendi, Promised Day is Come, p. vi.

 

UN Human Rights Council – 38th Session, June 2018

UN Human Rights Council – 38th Session, June 2018

Item 4: Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention

Geneva—27 June 2018

Mr. President,

Today, we would like to speak about two countries whose citizens face human rights violations on a daily basis: Iran and Yemen. Amidst this ongoing suffering, in both countries, the Baha’i, a religious minority, also face relentless persecution solely for their beliefs.

In Iran, despite the authorities’ continuous public denial of the persecution of the Baha’is— most recently expressed by the Foreign Minister himself—the human rights violations continue unabated. The directives for these acts of discrimination come from the highest levels of government. The most flagrant example is a fatwa, or religious decree, issued on 26 March 2018 by Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, where he stated: “You should avoid any association and dealings with this perverse and misguided sect.”

One of the results of the government-orchestrated persecution is economic strangulation. Hundreds of Baha’i families in Iran are deprived of the possibility to earn a living, either through denial of employment in the public sector or the cruel and intentional sealing of their shops.

In Yemen, three days before the latest fatwa by Mr. Khamenei, Mr. ‘Abdu’l-Malek al-Houthi, the leader of the Houthis, delivered a televised speech where he vehemently vilified and strongly denounced the Baha’i Faith, further intensifying the ongoing persecution—including several arrests and deteriorating prison conditions—of the Baha’is in that country.

He warned Yemenis of the “satanic” Baha’i “movement” that is “waging a war of doctrine” against Islam, described Baha’is as “infidels” and deniers of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad, and spread other falsehoods about the Baha’i Faith. He finally urged Yemenis to defend their country against the Baha’is under the pretext that “those who destroy the faith of people are no less evil and dangerous than those who kill people with their bombs.”

The rhetoric employed by Mr. Al-Houthi is concerning and can incite acts of violence and further increase the persecution against the Baha’is.

Such attempts to divide societies must stop once and for all. The international community must urge the Iranian and Houthi authorities to respect the human rights of their citizens.

Situation of Baha’is in Yemen

Situation of Baha’is in Yemen

UN Human Rights Council - 37th Session, Item 10

Geneva—22 March 2018

Mr. President,

On the 2nd of January, a judge in Sana’a, Yemen, sentenced a Bahá’i, Mr. Hamed bin Haydara, to death. Arrested in 2013, he has been held in prison for over 4 years, under the most terrible of conditions imaginable in a country ravaged by conflict, illnesses and famine. For months on end he was severely tortured and electrocuted. And finally, after prolonged court proceedings marked by a lack of due process, Mr. bin Haydara was tried in absentia, convicted, and condemned to death on the pretext that he had been in communication with the Universal House of Justice, the highest governing body of the Baha’is, which is located in Israel.

In the sentence—a copy of which has yet to be delivered to Mr. bin Haydara and his lawyers—the judge also ordered that all Bahá’í Assemblies in Yemen be dissolved.

Mr. President,

One can justifiably ask: what relation does a case of so-called espionage have with the existence of a religious community’s elected institutions, if the accusation levelled against Hamed bin Haydara were not intimately linked to his religious beliefs?

In fact, the case of Mr. bin Haydara is part of a systematic refusal by Houthis, under the influence of Iranian authorities, to allow members of this religious minority to freely practice their faith. Currently, six Bahá’ís are being arbitrarily imprisoned in Sana’a, with many others facing the threat of imminent arrest.

In response to this wave of persecution, the international community must continue to urge the Houthi authorities to cease their unjust treatment of the Bahá’ís, who despite the dire situation in their country have refused to side with one group or another and have, instead, endeavoured to serve all Yemenis.

Situation of Baha’is in Iran

Situation of Baha’is in Iran

UN Human Rights Council – 37th Session, March 2018

Item 4: Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention

Geneva—14 March 2018

Mr. President,

Summary and arbitrary executions are horrendous human rights violations that continue to affect the people of Iran. Such heinous acts were the lot of the Baha’is at the inception of the Faith in the middle of the nineteenth century, when over 20,000 individuals were brutally killed because the religious authorities could not tolerate this new religion. They were also part of the day-to-day reality of numerous Baha’i families in the early years of the Islamic Republic. However, thanks to the pressure of the international community, including resolutions such as the one presented at this session of the Council, Baha’is have not been executed for two decades, although the prevailing state-sponsored campaign of incitement to hatred has led to a number of vicious murders, which have rarely been dealt with justly.

Nevertheless, the facade of this decrease in executions against Baha’is conceals a more insidious reality:

Think of a family whose members have been prohibited from accessing higher education for two, sometimes three, generations. Some of the same family members are banned from working in the public sector because of state policy and have been dismissed from employment because of coercive actions by the Ministry of Information. Other family members have even had their agricultural lands unlawfully seized and crops destroyed. All of this simply because they are Baha’is. And when finally, they resort to establishing their own private small businesses in order to earn a living, these are shut down and sealed on the pretext that they are closed in observance of Baha’i Holy Days and their business licenses are revoked.

Mr. President, what I have briefly described is the Iranian authorities premeditated and well-orchestrated scheme to suffocate an entire religious community and to destroy them as a viable entity in Iranian society.

Pages

Subscribe to English