English

Unlocking Human Capacity as a Driver of Social Development

Unlocking Human Capacity as a Driver of Social Development

A Statement of the Baha'i International Community On the 53rd Session of the Commission for Social Development

New York—3 February 2015

At a time when Member States are not only reflecting on progress made since the 1995 World Summit for Social Development in Copenhagen, but also laying the foundations for the next global development agenda, rethinking social development is more important than ever.  Critical in this regard will be reframing the role human capacity plays in the betterment of society. Structural reform is necessary in many areas. But it is people who enforce regulations or ignore them, who translate plans into action or hesitate on the sidelines, who uphold positions of authority or abuse them. The ability of people – individually and as members of communities and institutions – to achieve something they collectively value is therefore an indispensable means of meeting the Commission’s central objectives of eradicating poverty, promoting full employment and fostering social integration.

Appreciation for the human dimension is by no means absent from contemporary discourse. In his recent synthesis report on the Post-2015 agenda, for example, the Secretary General notes that the challenges facing the global community “are not accidents of nature or the results of phenomena beyond our control. They result from actions and omissions of people.” His report on the priority theme of this Commission similarly notes that “in both economic and social terms, the most productive policies and investments were those that empowered people to maximize their capacities, resources and opportunities.”

Yet when considering means of implementation, the synthesis report devotes 31 paragraphs to financing and nine to technology, while giving only four to institutional capacity and exactly one each to volunteerism and culture. Financial and technological resources will, of course, be critical to global development – both will need to be generated far more robustly and distributed far more equitably if progress is to advance. But all too often change is attributed almost exclusively to institutions and structures, thereby limiting the power and agency of individuals and communities. People are at the center of the agenda, and this is a major victory of the World Summit. But care should be taken lest people be treated primarily as passive objects to be developed, rather than as active developers in their own right.

How will human well-being be advanced in widely varying contexts around the globe? How will efforts extend beyond capitals and population centers, to reach the countless rural areas that host nearly half the global population? Who will do this work? How will these individuals be supported? National governments have unique responsibilities in this work, and the obligations and commitments of the current global order cannot be neglected with impunity. But governmental action alone is not sufficient. As the Secretary General noted in the synthesis report, “If we are to succeed, the new agenda cannot remain the exclusive domain of institutions and governments. It must be embraced by people.”

To more effectively harness the constructive potential of humanity, the notion that access to financial resources is required to make meaningful contributions to society must be challenged. Material wealth is often equated with capacity, either explicitly or implicitly, in development thought and discourse. Those with greater financial assets are presumed to have more resources in general. They are taken to be the engines of development, the source of progress, and the rest are relegated to secondary functions, if not excluded altogether. Extreme poverty of course imposes numerous hardships and limitations, and it must be eradicated on both pragmatic and moral grounds. Yet financial capacity is not synonymous with the human capacity needed to advance constructive social transformation. There is no guarantee, for example, that those living in affluence are taking any active role in the betterment of humankind. Conversely, the efforts that those who are materially impoverished to assist their communities are certainly not without significance or impact. At all levels of wealth, human capacity is defined not only by one’s potential to achieve goals, but also one’s volition to take the needed actions. Leveraging human capacity for the betterment of society therefore has to do not only with what people are able to do, but also what they actually choose to do. And no people, culture, or economic group has a monopoly on choosing to dedicate their abilities to the common good. 

The Secretary General’s report on the theme of this Commission notes that 3.8 billion people, about 53% of the current global population, live on less than $4 per day.  Though dollar-figure measures of poverty are inherently problematic, this is nevertheless a reality the implications of which can no longer be ignored. Those with limited material means far outnumber those living in abundance, and no longer can it be realistically imagined that a small segment of humanity will, on its own, be able to bring about the advancement of all the rest. At this point in the development of the global community, such a proposition is neither feasible, nor desirable. The aggregate talents of several billion individuals represent a phenomenal reservoir of resources for constructive change – in numerical terms if nothing else – that has so far gone largely untapped. Efforts to rethink and strengthen social development in the contemporary world therefore need to ensure that the contributions of those who have traditionally been treated largely as passive recipients of aid are meaningfully integrated into global processes of development.

Efforts along these lines will be central to mobilizing all available resources for global development. But participation in the advancement of society is also, beyond all practical considerations, meaningful in and of itself. Being of tangible service to others, working in collaboration toward worthy ends, exercising personal abilities in pursuit of the common good – factors such as these are intrinsic sources of human upliftment and satisfaction. They are defining features of the concept of “development”, both individual and social, and need no justification beyond themselves. Formulating goals for the advancement of civilization and making those goals a reality is therefore a task that will ultimately need to be pursued not only in working groups, commissions, and high-level panels, but also in growing numbers of farms and street corners, village councils and neighborhood gatherings around the world. In this way will humanity begin to assume responsibility for its collective destiny.

Because many of these concepts are implemented at the local level, applying them to the intergovernmental processes the Commission deals with can be challenging.  We would therefore like to offer a number of suggestions for consideration.  Specifically, development goals should:

  • address the human resources needed to achieve transformative global progress as robustly as  the financial and technological resources needed.
  • make the building of capacity to contribute to social progress a central objective in formulating targets at the international level, planning interventions at the national level, and monitoring progress at all levels.
  • prioritize universal participation in local development efforts,  regardless of demographic categories, such as gender, age, race, ethnicity, and religion.
  • allow sufficient policy and reporting space for capacity building and empowerment efforts to develop organically and respond to local circumstances.

Twenty years ago, development took a large step forward when the World Summit gave a “human face” to a discourse that had previously centered on economic growth and structural adjustment. Progress in this area continues today as Member States engage in rethinking and strengthening social development in the contemporary world. The goals being considered – those first outlined in Copenhagen and many more proposed in the Post-2015 process – will require the mobilization of resources on scales never before attempted. They also call for a clear understanding of the kinds of resources by which progress can be achieved. The Bahá'í International Community hopes that the concepts touched on in this document contribute to an ongoing exploration of how the talents and abilities of the peoples of the world constitute a critical means of accomplishing this important work. In this regard, we welcome all perspectives on the broad-based leveraging of human capacity as means for the advancement of civilization.

Toward a New Discourse on Religion and Gender Equality

Toward a New Discourse on Religion and Gender Equality

Baha'i International Community’s Statement to the 59th Commission on the Status of Women and on the 20th Anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women

New York—1 February 2015

As Member States gather to review the progress made in the implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and to address gender equality in the post-2015 development agenda, the time has come for a serious conversation about the role of religion in advancing the equality of women and men. Religion as a basis for social and political mobilization is a reality that must be openly examined. The continuing importance of religion in people’s lives and identities can no longer be ignored. If it is to play a constructive role in society, the very concept of religion, as well as its nature and purpose needs to be reexamined. We must be ready to discard labels that have locked us in adversarial debates such as “secular vs. religious,” “modern vs. traditional,” “liberal vs. conservative,” “Western vs. non-Western.” The role of religion in human life and the equality of women and men are realities too complex to be reduced to such comparisons. A new discourse is needed—one suited to the needs of the age in which we live. The Baha'i International Community wishes to stimulate and to contribute to such a discourse.

At the outset, we wish to state clearly our belief that the equality of men and women is a facet of human reality and not just a condition to be achieved for the common good. That which makes human beings human—their inherent dignity and nobility—is neither male nor female. The search for meaning, for purpose, for community; the capacity to love, to create, to persevere, has no gender. Such an assertion has profound implications for the organization of every aspect of human society.

We see religion not as a set of dogmas, or conflicting denominations. Rather, we posit that religion is an ongoing process through which humanity becomes conscious of the spiritual dimension of human life and learns to orient its individual and collective life accordingly. At the core of religion is a set of spiritual principles, which, together, form the common heritage of humankind. At each stage of human history and development—and no less today in the midst of an emerging global community—religion acquires new meanings, significance, functions and expressions. Today, as the insights of women are increasingly recognized as essential to the creation of healthy families, more peaceful communities, more vibrant intellectual life, and more effective governance, it is their voices in particular that must inform the discourse on the nature of religion and its role in contemporary life.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its progeny of human rights instruments have provided the international community with a normative framework, which recognizes the inherent dignity of the individual and elaborates the rights and responsibilities upon which a peaceful society can be built. The most challenging task for governments and communities alike has been the translation of these norms into a lived reality for the peoples of the world. Legal standards and social science affirm the equality of all human beings, however it is the deep-seated beliefs about the nature of women and men and the relationship between them that have proven to be the most formidable obstacles to the realization of an equitable social order. Twenty years after the (then) largest gathering of Heads of State and civil society brought gender equality to the top of the global agenda, discrimination against women remains the most widespread injustice in the world today.

It is well documented that throughout history, much of humanity has looked to religions and their leaders for guidance and continues to do so today. While many thought that modernity would diminish the influence of religion—a seeming victory of the ‘rational mind’ over ‘irrational’ beliefs—this has not come to pass. Religion is reasserting itself in myriad ways. In the name of religion has been raised the call to service to the common weal; to embracing a common humanity that transcends divisions of nations and race; to stewardship for the environment; to forgiveness and reconciliation. The role of religion as a shaper of culture and community life has been increasingly acknowledged by the UN. Having recognized the ability of faith-based organizations to reach and provide human and material resources in underserved regions, a number of UN agencies have sought to partner with these organizations in pursuit of common goals. Several hundred religious NGOs have been granted Consultative Status with the UN’s Economic and Social Council and are active contributors to discussions at the UN.

At the same time, religion has fallen prey to ignorance and blind ambition. In its name, fanaticism and violence are promoted.  Interpretations of religious doctrines as assigning an inferior status to women and girls have given rise to patriarchal systems and structures, which continue to obstruct women’s full participation in society. The international community finds itself severely challenged by the intransigence of societies who continue to obstruct the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women and flagrantly violate the human rights of women based on interpretations of religious law. In some countries, for example, marital rape remains outside of the law; a man’s honor is a viable defense for murdering a female member of his family; no minimum age requirement for marriage exists. In other countries, women have no right to divorce or to inherit; their education is considered optional or unnecessary; they are not present in public spaces and governing structures. While still prevalent, the incidence of such examples is in decline. Progress can be seen in the increased participation of women in public life and community affairs; it can be discerned in the significant efforts of many countries to effect change through strategies focused on the education of women and girls. 

At this stage in the collective life of humanity, we wish to draw the Commission’s attention to three areas of endeavor, which we feel are critical to addressing the present-day situation of women and girls.

1.     Responsibility of religious leaders. Religious leaders have a pivotal role to play in addressing the profound injustices that prevent women and girls from developing their potential and playing their rightful role in the advancement of society. If they are to be worthy partners in the construction of a more just and peaceful society, religious leaders must unhesitatingly raise their voices against the violation of human rights, against all forms of violence and fanaticism, and against the denial of equality perpetrated in the name of religion. They must examine the ways in which their words, their actions, or their silence have enabled the status quo. They must account for the ways in which their guidance and example may be stifling the exercise of those intellectual faculties that distinguish humankind. Governments have a role to play in encouraging reflection on these issues.

2.     The role of men and boys. The equality of women and men is not a condition whose effects will be limited to half of the world’s population. Its operationalization will revolutionize all facets of human society—the generation of knowledge and development of intellectual life, the practice of governance, the allocation of material resources and the condition of the family, to name but a few. Men must come to realize that under current conditions of inequality, the development of their full potential is not possible. It is they who must find the moral courage to convey and model new understandings of masculinity and who must challenge and question the narrow roles that society and the media have assigned to them. In the final analysis, it is not enough to create space in the current social order for women to play their rightful role. Rather, the goal is for women and men to work shoulder-to-shoulder, each as the helpmate of the other—in the context of family, work, community, and international affairs—to construct a society which allows for the flourishing of all.

3.     Discrimination against women based on interpretations of religion. We urge the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women to formulate a comment, which addresses discrimination against women based on interpretations of religion, noting that it constitutes a major obstacle to the overarching goal of peace.  

The achievement of gender equality will require financial, moral and intellectual resources on a scale not yet seen. It will involve the efforts of the masses of humanity, the insights of religion as well as science, the fearless commitment of men alongside women, unprecedented collaboration at all levels of governance, and an understanding that the advancement of women is the advancement of all. The Baha'i International Community invites all those working towards the betterment of humanity to join us in a dialogue about the issues raised in this statement. It is our hope that in this way we will learn and better understand each other’s perspectives and collectively advance our efforts towards the realization of a social order which supports the flourishing of all. 

To the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Lima, Peru

To the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Lima, Peru

Lima, Peru—30 November 2014

To those assembled for the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Lima, Peru

Valued collaborators in the building of a sustainable future,

The human family today shares one global destiny in one global homeland. This is a truth the implications of which can no longer be ignored. We therefore welcome this occasion for representatives of government, religion, and civil society to discuss how duties toward the collective trust that is our shared planet can be most effectively discharged.

Historically, humanity’s growing impact on the climate was closely tied to remarkable advances in industry and production. Placing our ongoing advancement on more ecologically sustainable foundations will require a similarly robust spirit of ingenuity and intellectual inquiry. The scale of innovation needed will require a vast expansion in scientific and technological endeavour, not merely on the part of select populations, but across all segments of the global community. The challenges ahead will demand the generation, application, and diffusion of knowledge by all the earth’s inhabitants and in light of our shared planetary future.

But science, information, and knowledge alone – however vital – will be insufficient to address the concerns of global climate change. Religion, and the values and morals it inculcates, will also be necessary. The capacity to build a shared sense of vision and pursue it through acts of collective volition, to sacrifice for the well-being of the whole, to trust, and to give freely and generously to others will be critical to the work ahead. These will not arise through political expediency or mere environmental pragmatism. Rather, they will need to draw on the deepest sources of human inspiration and motivation. Religious communities and their leaders therefore have an indispensable role to play in the realm of climate change.

Religion and science provide complementary insights into the shaping of individual and collective life. Both impact choices and priorities, and both will be required in the just and sustainable ordering of the affairs of humankind.

The work of addressing global climate change ultimately revolves around the aim of human lives well lived. This is a goal cherished by people, cultures and religions the world over. In it can therefore be found a powerful point of unity to support the work ahead. Our ardent prayer is that the achievements won at this conference will provide firm foundations on which the well-being and prosperity of humanity can be ever more effectively pursued for both this and future generations.

We wish you all success in your deliberations,

The Bahá'í International Community

Situation of the Baha'is of Iran

Situation of the Baha'is of Iran

Human Rights Council 27 - item 4

Geneva—16 September 2014

Yesterday, the Baha'i International Community released a document entitled “Unfulfilled Promises”, which reviews the commitments the Islamic Republic of Iran made at  the last session of the UPR as they pertain to the situation of the Baha'is – the largest non-Muslim religious minority in the country.

The review shows that, since 2010, not only has Iran made absolutely no improvement on the accepted recommendations, the situation of the Baha'is has worsened.  One such case is the denial of access to higher education for young Baha'is – a human rights violation to which their parents, and sometimes even their grand parents, were also subjected.

The Iranian government has repeatedly tried to deny this pernicious act, but this past week, as the academic year begins, Baha'i students in Iran were faced with a new tactic: when they sought their results on line, they were referred to the office which oversees the examination process.  There, they were simply shown the National University Entrance Examination booklet which states explicitly that “only Muslims and officially recognized minorities are permitted to participate” – thus, not the Baha'is.

The question one of the students asked the authorities is how he had been identified as a Baha'i without having had to enter his religion throughout the whole registration process.   

This is a question we should all be asking ourselves.  Moreover, it sends a chilling message to all the Baha'is in Iran:   are they now identified in some secret, official record?

In 2006, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief disclosed a secret document that indicated that the Supreme Leader had ordered all national and local government agencies to identify the Baha'is –  is that database now  complete and in use?  Is this the ‘yellow badge’ of the digital age?

In the month leading to Iran’s review, will the government begin to take adequate steps to reverse this unjust deprivation of access to higher education?  Or will they continue to devise ways to keep up their pretence?

Desecration of the Baha'i cemetery in Shiraz

Desecration of the Baha'i cemetery in Shiraz

UN Human Rights Council 26th session, Agenda Item 4

Geneva—23 June 2014

Mr. President,

At the last session of the Human Rights Council, the delegation of the Islamic Republic of Iran stated in a right of reply that “citizenship rights for the Baha'is are completely respected” and that “if judicial action is taken for an individual it is as a result of unlawful conduct”.

A few weeks later, 40 to 50 bulldozers were lined up and began destroying the old Baha'i cemetery in Shiraz, where approximately 950 Baha'is are buried.  The site had been confiscated by the government in 1983, at which time its grave markers were leveled and its main buildings destroyed. Three years ago, its ownership was transferred to the Revolutionary Guards.

Among the persons at rest in the cemetery are the "ten Baha'i women of Shiraz," who were hanged on 18 June 1983. The youngest among them, Mona Mahmudnizhad, was only 17 at the time of her death. They were convicted of "crimes" such as being "Zionists" and the teaching of children's classes – the equivalent of "Sunday school" in the West; and during their trial, each of these women was told that if she recanted her faith, she would be released.

So one could sincerely ask:  if Baha'is in Iran enjoy their citizenship rights, why aren’t their dead respected?  If they commit unlawful conduct, why would recanting their faith dispense them from punishment?

And if perhaps the representatives of Iran use the excuse that the cemetery is old and needed for other purposes, then could they tell us why there is an empty plot of land next to the cemetery, and yet they choose not to use it but rather to exhume the graves of the hundreds of Baha'is who are buried there.

It is time for the international community and the High Commissioner to put pressure on the Iranian government to halt this heinous act -- to stop the desecration of the Shiraz cemetery, and to respect the rights of Iranian Baha'is, whether dead or alive.

Contributing to an Ever-Advancing Civilization: The Baha'i International Community and the United Nations

Contributing to an Ever-Advancing Civilization: The Baha'i International Community and the United Nations

Third Nishan Forum on World Civilizations. Shandong University

Jinan, China—22 May 2014

The Baha’i International Community is an international non-governmental organization that has been active at the United Nations and other international fora for over 60 years. The Baha’i community’s association with the United Nations dates back to the League of Nations and has its roots in the global vision that animates the teachings of the Baha’i Faith. Baha’is understand the progress of humanity as a global enterprise whose purpose is to bring prosperity to all peoples, an enterprise that must pursue its aim in the context of an emerging world civilization.

“All human beings,” wrote Bahá’u’lláh, the Founder of the Baha’i Faith, “have been created to carry forward an ever-advancing civilization.” Thus, every person, every community and every nation have been vested with an obligation to play their part in building a peaceful and prosperous global society. The goals and aspirations of the UN Charter, so timelessly articulated by its authors including the eminent Chinese scholar and diplomat Cheng Peng Chun, boldly reaffirmed humanity’s faith in the dignity of every human being and in the equal rights of women and men, and those of nations large and small. It further committed to international cooperation to promote the social progress of all people. 

The United Nations has a long history of engagement with organizations of civil society. Today, nearly 4000 non-governmental organizations are formally associated with the United Nations through its Economic and Social Council—they represent the concerns and voices of a veritable cross section of humanity as well as perspectives drawn from various faiths and belief systems. This association continues to inform and shape the discussions and discourse within the UN community. In recent years, for example, various UN agencies have begun to reflect more consciously and systematically on their relationships with faith-based organizations, recognizing the many contributions of such organizations in various fields of endeavor as well as the defining role that values, ethics and beliefs play in the lives of people around the world.

From the moment of its accreditation, the Baha’i International Community began to play an energetic role in United Nations’ affairs. “Be anxiously concerned,” wrote Bahá’u’lláh, “with the needs of the age ye live in, and center your deliberations on its exigencies and requirements.” Throughout its nearly 70 years of association with the United Nations, the Baha’i International Community, often working in collaboration with UN agencies and other NGOs, has worked in many different areas in the fields of social and sustainable development including in particular, the equality of women and men, the protection of the girl child, the protection of vulnerable and marginalized populations, and the advancement of a culture of discourse and collective deliberation, among others. At the world conferences of the 1990s, Baha’is actively contributed their vision and experience—at the World Conference on Education for All (Thailand), the World Summit for Children (New York), the UN Conference on the Environment (Rio de Janeiro), the International Conference on Population (Cairo), the World Summit for Social Development (Copenhagen) and the particularly vibrant Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. Guiding these contributions has been a steady effort to apply intelligently and thoughtfully ethical and moral principles to the resolution of global challenges, and a steady striving for coherence between the material and moral dimensions of human life. 

It is important to note that these contributions and ideas are more than theory or aspiration. While they are guided by the Writings of the Baha’i Faith, they are equally informed by and intimately linked with the efforts of countless individuals and communities around the world working towards this vision of ethical and material advancement. We believe that every member of the human family, has not only the right to benefit from a prosperous civilization but an obligation to contribute towards its construction. In this area, close parallels can be seen with the Confucian ethic of responsibility and principles central to it, such as the idea that human beings exist in a web of relationships and not simply as isolated individuals, that social well-being requires trust and reciprocity and not merely a balance of adversarial relationships, and that human beings’ own flourishing requires them to exert themselves for the betterment of others.

As a global community, then, Baha’is are consciously striving to learn how populations of every kind and background can develop the capacity to take charge of their material, intellectual, social and moral development. In this way, human progress becomes increasingly representative of the aspirations and talents of mankind as a whole, and less a process carried out by one group on behalf of another.

Local efforts to improve the well-being of individual neighborhoods, villages and communities carried out by Baha’is and their like-minded collaborators provide key grounding and insight for the Baha’i International Community’s work at the United Nations. Such efforts involve constant effort to understand and translate moral principles of the Baha’i Faith into concrete action. The aim is not indoctrination, rather the raising up of individuals and communities capable of generating and applying new knowledge—as equal participants contributing to the building of a new civilization. It involves patience, understanding, flexibility, wisdom and humility as individuals and communities encounter and work through the deep-rooted and challenging issues before them. Let us take the example of corruption afflicting efforts at just and effective governance and administration at all levels. Not only does corruption dampen economic growth and reduce the utility of government services, it is antithetical to social well-being; it breeds distrust, resentment and hostility; it undermines solidarity and collective action.  How can this be addressed? How can the roots of corruption be reduced?  How can the capacity for moral behavior be developed in individuals, communities and the social and governing institutions of society?

One approach being pursued by Baha’is and their like-minded collaborators in this regard is classes for the moral and spiritual education of young people. These classes seek to equip children with the moral framework needed to navigate the many ethical choices they will face in life. The classes also aim to develop in youth a strong sense of purpose and instill in them the ideals needed to support a healthy and prosperous society. The curriculum seeks to help young people realize and develop their spiritual capacities, such as capacities of the intellect and of rational thought, the capacity to love, and the capacity to initiate and sustain action for the betterment of society, to name a few. These classes are initiated and led by local residents working with young people in their own neighborhood or village, thereby strengthening social bonds and ties of association at the local level. Such community based-efforts are the practical expressions of moral and spiritual principles, which bear on human interactions and collective life at all levels of society. Inevitably, efforts to express moral principles in a social context will raise further questions for communities: What, for example, is the optimal relationship between relatively informal community-based children’s classes and government-sponsored education systems? How are ethical and moral convictions about personal conduct and conscience operationalized in complex systems and bureaucracies? Raising and exploring such questions with others—questions arising from practice—represents another facet of the Baha’i International Community’s participation in the prevalent discourses on human progress and prosperity.  

The Baha’i International Community contributes to discourses at the international level both in terms of the ideas and perspectives that it puts forward and in terms of its efforts to advance a more constructive culture of discourse and deliberation.  By discourse I am referring to the expression of our attitudes, values, and understanding of ourselves and our material, social, and spiritual reality; I am referring to the manner in which we organize our knowledge and ideas; indeed, I am referring to a crucial means by which culture is shaped and developed. As we meet here near the birthplace of Confucius, it is fitting to quote briefly from the Analects:

“A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.”  — Confucius, Analects, Book XIII, Chapter 3, verses 4-7 

Confucius believed that social disorder stemmed from the failure to perceive, to understand and deal with reality. The Baha’i International Community views the principles of the Baha’i Faith as essential resources for understanding and dealing with the challenges facing communities around the world. Similarly, it sees the efforts of communities trying to operationalize those principles in local settings as important models which can be explored and assessed by all. We see ourselves as part of a discourse among the community of nations and we seek to contribute to this discourse by offering new ways of approaching familiar problems, by re-framing the way that certain problems are understood, be identifying assumptions and mental models underlying the understanding of reality and by drawing on insights from the fields of science as well as religion. We do so in a mode of learning, knowing that no one can lay claim to perfect understanding or complete knowledge. Through practice and through discourse, our understanding advances and is continually refined.

Yet it is not only the content of the discourse that matters, it is also the culture and spirit in which it unfolds. We have observed over the years of engaging with the United Nations community a culture of discourse often characterized by adversarial and positional debates, which are not conducive to meaningful collaboration. Recognizing the importance of process, our Office has sought to foster new modes constructive inquiry and of patterns of interaction which allow the insights and perspectives of participants to emerge and contribute to the generation of new knowledge. To offer a concrete example, over the past several years the UN community has been working to create a new framework for global development—a framework to succeed the Millennium Development Goals. In light of the complexity of the issues involved in such an undertaking and the diversity of participants in this conversation, we sought to create a neutral and informal space a to facilitate a conversation in which the UN community—its agencies, Member States, and NGOs—could freely explore and deliberate about development issues of common concern. 

I hope that through this brief presentation about the Baha’i International Community I have been able to convey the Baha’i perspective that the betterment of humanity is indeed a global enterprise and one which will require the participation of the masses of humanity rather than a small group of actors working on behalf of the disenfranchised. “Every nation and every group,” the international governing body of the Baha’i Faith recently wrote, “indeed, every individual will, to a greater or lesser degree, contribute to the emergence of the world civilization towards which humanity is irresistibly moving.”

The work of the Baha’i International Community can be understood as seeking to facilitate, at the international level and particularly within the context of the UN, an ongoing conversation about the requirements of a world civilization progressing in all aspects of its individual and collective life. This is a conversation that rightfully belongs to all of humanity, and the Baha’i International Community is working to bring ever-growing numbers within its fold.

Builders of Civilization: Youth and the Advancement of Humankind

Builders of Civilization: Youth and the Advancement of Humankind

Contribution of the Baha'i International Community to the 2014 World Conference on Youth

Colombo, Sri Lanka—2 May 2014

It is often said that youth are the leaders of tomorrow, the future of humanity. This is clearly true, but young people are very much present in the neighborhoods and villages, work places and communities, of the world today. We form a sizable segment of many populations, and the way those of our generation understand ourselves, our inherent capacities, and our role in society has, in every land, significant social consequences.

The issue, then, is not the difference youth can make in the life of society. Young people are already impacting their communities every day, in countless ways and to widely varying ends. The issue, rather, is how the desire to contribute to constructive change and to offer meaningful service – both characteristic of our stage in life – can be strengthened, supported, and expanded.

At the international level, discourse on the role of youth often focuses on issues of voice and participation. Integrating young people into formal structures of power is of course advantageous for a variety of reasons. But simply feeding “young” voices into “old” systems, if unaccompanied by more substantive forms of participation runs the risk of degenerating into mere tokenism. Young people are needed as leaders and decision-makers not only in youth forums and special-purpose councils, but in those spaces where the course and direction of society as a whole are determined. This may well require the development of new systems of decision-making and collaboration – systems characterized by an unbiased search for truth, an attitude of cooperation and reciprocity, and an appreciation for the vital role every individual can play in the betterment of the whole.

But society is far more than a collection of impersonal laws, policies, programs, and organizations. It is equally shaped by norms, values, aspirations, and relationships. It is important, therefore, not to artificially limit young people’s potential sphere of contribution. Youth might well contribute to social progress by participating in the structures of government or volunteering their time and capacities to development agencies or other civil society groups. But no individual is dependent on external organizations to better the condition of his or her community. None of us are reliant on the direction of others to begin working for the common good. None of us are incapable of making a difference in our own social spaces and circles.

In this light, the paths open to the youth of the world for selfless service to others are numerous. Few of these opportunities are found at the highest levels of global governance, such as the conference that has drawn us together today. Most are less formal and closer to home, but equally important. In partnering with other youth and like-minded adults, for example, we play a powerful role in catalyzing home-grown transformation and progress. We make similarly unique contributions in the development of upcoming generations, providing those younger than ourselves with a model of conduct to emulate and a trusted partner in developing personal capacities and exploring how those talents might be dedicated to the well-being of the community. Put simply, our generation is a vibrant source of social advancement in a variety of contexts, ranging from the village square to the global stage.

In considering contributions to the Post-2015 development agenda, it is important to recognize that an essential element of progress requires addressing patterns of thought and behavior if it is to be truly transformative. It must, in other words, enter into the realm of culture. The task of combatting corruption, for example, is ultimately a matter of building a culture of honesty and trustworthiness as well as one of fairness and equity. Reducing exclusion and addressing prejudice similarly requires norms of solidarity, respect, and mutual support. Youth, then, are crucial to the global development agenda not simply for the work we do and the projects we complete. Equally important are the social arrangements we and our contemporaries can envision, the constructive patterns of association and interaction we can promote that give practical expression to our natural sense of idealism, and the patterns of community life we can build and welcome others to take part in.

In this light, the involvement of youth is not something to be sought for our sake alone, nor a tool designed to advance our needs as a specific population group. Rather, it is a component critical to the well-being of all of humankind, young and old alike. Youth must be involved in development efforts because the construction of a new and better society rests on our shoulders as much as on those of any others, and everyone is worse off when the contributions of any group or population are marginalized or disregarded.

Human Rights in Iran

Human Rights in Iran

Agenda item 4 of the general debate: human rights situations that require the Council's attention

Geneva—18 March 2014

Mr. President,

Iranian Baha’is continue to face injustice in every aspect of their lives.  They are killed, arbitrarily imprisoned, tortured, their houses are raided, their shops burnt, sealed and defaced, their cemeteries are desecrated and their Holy Places destroyed.  They are portrayed in the media as a dangerous cult.  They are prevented from associating with their fellow citizens through prohibition of employment and denial of access to higher education.  Even children are not spared, as infants, they are imprisoned with their mothers and in primary school they are singled out and ridiculed by their teachers.

Despite all this persecution, they are still exerting all efforts in order to contribute their share to the betterment of their community, and of Iran, the birthplace of their Faith.  Indeed, last December, the seven former leaders of the community penned a letter from inside prison to President Rouhani, regarding the draft charter of citizens’ rights.  In it, the y laid down their vision of an Iran in which no one is “subjugated and oppressed by reason of their ethnicity, gender, religious belief, or any other distinction”.

It is heartening for the Bahá’’is to see that more and more of their fellow citizens courageously stand up for their rights.  A few days ago, an open letter was addressed to Ayatollah Larijani, the Head of the Judiciary by 75 prominent activists and  rights defenders, writers and journalists, requesting that Baha’is by treated with justice.

The Iranian government is now receiving strong signals from within Iran.  It is important that the international community, in turn, echoes these calls and reiterates its stance that the human rights situation in Iran won’t be considered improved unless and until the situation of the Baha’is is addressed.

Interactive Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Iran

Interactive Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Iran

UN Human Rights Council 25th session

Geneva—17 March 2014

Dr. Saheed, in your report you stress that “while welcoming the … positive steps” made by the new government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, “they currently do not address fully the fundamental human rights concerns” including “laws and practices that infringe upon the rights to life, to the freedoms of expression, association, assembly, belief and religion, to education and to non-discrimination.”

The Baha’i International Community concurs with this regrettable assessment: to date, there has been no improvement in the situation of Iranians who belong to the Baha’i Faith.  As you indicated yourself, 136 Baha’is are in prison solely on religious grounds, not one Baha’i youth has been able to complete his or her studies in an Iranian university – and most of them are denied access in the first place, shops continue to be sealed, work in the public sector is prohibited, cemeteries are desecrated, and incitement to hatred in state-sponsored media is rampant.

Even the meagre attempt to improve the human rights situation in Iran by drafting a citizenship rights charter, as you stated, “fails to address laws and policies that discriminate against religious minorities, including the Baha’i”.

Dr. Shaheed, you refer to “several individuals whose detention was identified as arbitrary by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention”.  Among those, as you know, are the seven former Baha’i leaders who were sentenced to 20 years imprisonment, in a trial that lacked all requirements to quality as “fair” under international law.  These seven men and women have now spent nearly six years behind bars, 3 to 6 months of which were in solitary confinement.  Have you been able to discuss their situation – which is emblematic of the situation of all the Baha’is in Iran – with Iranian authorities and what hope do you see for improvement in their situation under Mr. Rouhani?

Moreover, as you know, in August last year, Mr. Ataollah Rezvani, a prominent Baha’i from Bandar Abbas, was found in his car, fatally shot in the head.  Last month, three members of the Moody family were viciously and repeatedly stabbed by a masked intruder in the city of Birjand.  Neither of these two crimes have been properly investigated, forcing us to assume that they are actually condoned – if not initiated – by government authorities.  These are just two recent examples of a number of such instances of blatant impunity for crimes committed against members of the Baha’i Faith.  What procedural and substantives changes do you think must be made to combat this injustice?

UN Human Rights Council 24th session

UN Human Rights Council 24th session

Item:4 General Debate - 15th Meeting 24th Regular Session of Human Rights Council

Geneva—17 September 2013

Mr. President,

Three weeks ago, a Baha'i by the name of Mr. Ata'u'llah Rezvani was shot in the back of the head in the city of Bandar Abbas in Iran.  His body was found in his car near the railway station on the outskirts of the city where he lived with his wife and two children.  During the past few years, he had been pressured to leave the city by agents from the Intelligence Ministry, and recently he had received threatening phone calls from unknown people.  His assailants apparently forced him to drive to the location where he was murdered.

As a young man, Mr. Rezvani was expelled from university, the same unjust fate forced upon every young Baha'i in Iran today.  Recently, due to pressure and threats from the Intelligence Ministry, he was also dismissed from his job.

Mr. President,

Baha'is in Iran are not only imprisoned because of their beliefs and deprived of many basic rights, including the rights to work and higher education, but hateful propaganda is spread against them both by the State-sponsored media and by religious leaders.  For example, in recent years, a senior local cleric incited people to hatred and intolerance against the Baha'i Faith in the city where Mr. Rezvani was murdered.  It should also be noted that less than two months ago, an old fatwa issued by Iran’s Supreme Leader was published – by government sponsored media – in which he forbids Muslims from associating with Baha'iss.

Iran's new president, Mr. Hassan Rohani, has promised to uphold human rights for the people of Iran.  He must now show that his promises are genuine by not only investigating this religiously motivated crime but to uphold and respect the rights of all minorities in the country, as required by Iran's international obligations.  Those responsible must be held accountable and punished for this heinous act.

Pages

Subscribe to English