English

Situation of Baha’is in Yemen

Situation of Baha’is in Yemen

UN Human Rights Council - 37th Session, Item 10

Geneva—22 March 2018

Mr. President,

On the 2nd of January, a judge in Sana’a, Yemen, sentenced a Bahá’i, Mr. Hamed bin Haydara, to death. Arrested in 2013, he has been held in prison for over 4 years, under the most terrible of conditions imaginable in a country ravaged by conflict, illnesses and famine. For months on end he was severely tortured and electrocuted. And finally, after prolonged court proceedings marked by a lack of due process, Mr. bin Haydara was tried in absentia, convicted, and condemned to death on the pretext that he had been in communication with the Universal House of Justice, the highest governing body of the Baha’is, which is located in Israel.

In the sentence—a copy of which has yet to be delivered to Mr. bin Haydara and his lawyers—the judge also ordered that all Bahá’í Assemblies in Yemen be dissolved.

Mr. President,

One can justifiably ask: what relation does a case of so-called espionage have with the existence of a religious community’s elected institutions, if the accusation levelled against Hamed bin Haydara were not intimately linked to his religious beliefs?

In fact, the case of Mr. bin Haydara is part of a systematic refusal by Houthis, under the influence of Iranian authorities, to allow members of this religious minority to freely practice their faith. Currently, six Bahá’ís are being arbitrarily imprisoned in Sana’a, with many others facing the threat of imminent arrest.

In response to this wave of persecution, the international community must continue to urge the Houthi authorities to cease their unjust treatment of the Bahá’ís, who despite the dire situation in their country have refused to side with one group or another and have, instead, endeavoured to serve all Yemenis.

Situation of Baha’is in Iran

Situation of Baha’is in Iran

UN Human Rights Council – 37th Session, March 2018

Item 4: Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention

Geneva—14 March 2018

Mr. President,

Summary and arbitrary executions are horrendous human rights violations that continue to affect the people of Iran. Such heinous acts were the lot of the Baha’is at the inception of the Faith in the middle of the nineteenth century, when over 20,000 individuals were brutally killed because the religious authorities could not tolerate this new religion. They were also part of the day-to-day reality of numerous Baha’i families in the early years of the Islamic Republic. However, thanks to the pressure of the international community, including resolutions such as the one presented at this session of the Council, Baha’is have not been executed for two decades, although the prevailing state-sponsored campaign of incitement to hatred has led to a number of vicious murders, which have rarely been dealt with justly.

Nevertheless, the facade of this decrease in executions against Baha’is conceals a more insidious reality:

Think of a family whose members have been prohibited from accessing higher education for two, sometimes three, generations. Some of the same family members are banned from working in the public sector because of state policy and have been dismissed from employment because of coercive actions by the Ministry of Information. Other family members have even had their agricultural lands unlawfully seized and crops destroyed. All of this simply because they are Baha’is. And when finally, they resort to establishing their own private small businesses in order to earn a living, these are shut down and sealed on the pretext that they are closed in observance of Baha’i Holy Days and their business licenses are revoked.

Mr. President, what I have briefly described is the Iranian authorities premeditated and well-orchestrated scheme to suffocate an entire religious community and to destroy them as a viable entity in Iranian society.

Situation of Baha’is in Iran

Situation of Baha’is in Iran

UN Human Rights Council – 37th Session, March 2018. Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Geneva—12 March 2018

Mr. President,

The Baha’i International Community would like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the life and legacy of the late Asma Jahangir. She will be remembered as a courageous human rights defender, including those of the Baha’is, and an outspoken Special Rapporteur on Iran, and previously on freedom of religion or belief. In her last report, Ms. Jahangir presented the range of violations currently facing the Baha’is—including “the closure of shops; the firebombing of homes; arbitrary arrest; torture and other ill treatment whilst in detention; and discrimination whilst studying at university”.On a related note, last month, in an open letter, 25 of the world’s prominent professors, lawyers,and judges addressed the head of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights, Mr. Mohammad Javad Larijani, asking him to acknowledge the persecution of the Baha’is and to take steps to remedy the situation. Mr. Larijani’s attention was also drawn to a website called “The Archives of the Persecution of the Bahá’ís in Iran”, which compiles, for the first time, thousands of official documents, testimonials, and audio-visual materials, revealing irrefutable proof of the relentless persecution.

The primary sources housed by this website corroborate beyond a shadow of a doubt the Special Rapporteur’s latest findings. For example, the Archives include:

  • A letter from the Intelligence and National Security of the Province of Kerman reporting that, per instructions from the Ministry of Intelligence, businesses operated by members of the “Baha’i sect” were closed and sealed; A photo of a Baha’i-owned shop in Rafsanjan destroyed after an arson attack;

  • A photo of Mr. Zabihollah Mahrami, who was arbitrarily imprisoned for 10 years, during which he received death threats and was forced to perform arduous physical labour. He was ultimately discovered dead in his prison cell under suspicious circumstances; and

  • An internal letter from the Central Security Office of Payam-e- Nour University to a provincial president, requesting that he prevents the enrolment of Baha’i applicants.

Mr. President,

How many more interviews does a Special Rapporteur need to conduct and how much more evidence is required until the Iranian government finally decides to take this Council seriously and begin taking steps to address the grave human rights violations occurring in its country?

Beyond Mere Economics: A Moral Inquiry into the Roots of Empowerment

Beyond Mere Economics: A Moral Inquiry into the Roots of Empowerment

A Statement of the Bahá’í International Community

To the 62nd session of the Commission on the Status of Women

New York—12 March 2018

Young women from tribal villages in the hill country of Thailand participate in a program that, in addition to furthering their own development, helps them to better accompany the rising generations in improving some aspect of their local community’s conditions. Motivated by the contribution they are making, many choose to take jobs in their home villages during holiday breaks, rather than seeking higher-paid employment in more distant cities, so that they can continue supporting the development of their communities.

Women in rural villages in the Central African Republic are assisted to establish informal classes for the moral and spiritual education of young people in their immediate vicinity. As they gain experience and confidence, they begin mentoring other teachers who are newer to the process. In time, they convene gatherings to consult with community members about their aspirations for the village’s youngest members, and together establish a community-supported school. At one or other point in this process these women might begin receiving material assistance in support of their efforts. At every point they gain capacity, build confidence, and impact their community. 

In vignettes such as these can be found a conception of empowerment that includes, yet transcends, increased economic activity. Women and girls cannot, of course, make their full contribution to society when barred from owning the land they work, or when social norms make them dependent on male relatives to participate in the economy. But the path from doubt to self confidence, from silence to voice, from passivity to action, cannot be understood only in terms of entering the labor market or integrating into a global production chain of one kind or another. The development of capacity must concern itself with all aspects of human existence - economic as well as social, intellectual, cultural, spiritual, and moral. 

At the root of countless barriers to women and girls assuming their rightful place in society is a refusal to embrace the reality that women and men are equal, and that all human beings are one. When left unexposed to the light of justice and reason, distorted conceptions of reality manifest themselves in patterns of superiority, jealousy, mistrust, and fear. Under such conditions, women and girls are systematically disadvantaged in relation to their male counterparts. Their advancement is then viewed as threatening or demeaning. Their contributions can be overlooked and their perspectives discounted. Notably, this worldview in which advantage for some is understood to come at the expense of others affects other many human relationships, including between young and old, native and immigrant, and majority and minority. When the oneness of humankind is rejected, fault lines of exclusion and marginalization seem to appear at every turn.  

It need not be so. Evidence of the universality of those qualities that characterize humanity at its noblest - integrity and compassion, excellence and humility, justice and generosity - is abundant for those who wish to find it. There are many examples around the world of instances in which women and men are working shoulder to shoulder as mutually respected partners. One issue before the Commission on the Status of Women, then, is replication of what is working. How can a culture in which women and men jointly and joyfully contribute to the common good be built in society after society? What is possible to achieve in local communities - not just in a few pilot programs or for the duration of a funding cycle- but indefinitely into the future and all around the world? 

Such questions are of critical concern to those working for the empowerment of women. For its part, the worldwide Bahá’í community has been striving to learn about the role that knowledge plays - including its generation, diffusion, and application - in the advancement of society. Decades of experience have shown that when growing numbers of women and men, young and old, of all economic and educational backgrounds, work together to learn about patterns of relationship and corresponding social structures that reflect the fundamental oneness of the human family, real change is possible. The creation of spaces and mechanisms for consultation that draws on the experience of many and values the knowledge that each has to offer at any given point opens pathways for universal participation, and is indispensable to processes of enduring social change.

Educational systems as a whole should be concerned with building the capacity within a population to trace its own path of development and contribute to the common good. Our experience has shown that real transformation can occur when those sustaining such efforts at the grassroots strive to create an environment in which growing numbers of their friends, family members, neighbors, and acquaintances come to see themselves as active agents of their own development and protagonists of a constant effort to apply knowledge toward individual and collective progress.

Crucially, the central organizing principle of this educational process is the development of capabilities for service to the community and society. Assisted to undertake increasingly complex acts of service, participants gradually gain the vision, confidence, and skills necessary to begin offering activities and programs to others with less experience than themselves. In this way, a good portion of those who enter the process simply as participants go on to shoulder increasing responsibility for its perpetuation and expansion. 

Understanding one’s role in society in relation to the progress and development of others has proven to be a powerful source of motivation. For women in rural areas, it has often fueled a growing sense of being a capable and empowered contributor to the common good. Just as importantly, seeing women taking on roles of increasing responsibility, visibility, and decision-making has assisted - and not infrequently challenged - men and the community as a whole to rethink inherited assumptions about social patterns and the roles played by women and men. 

Also notable in the experience of many Bahá’í communities has been the transformative impact on the rising generations who are engaging in service-oriented efforts. Young people tend to be more flexible in their perceptions of what society could and should be, and frequently, it has been among this population that oppressive cultural assumptions about gender roles have first become susceptible to change. Similarly, the power of moral example that young people can bring to bear, the influence they can exert on mature members of their community through selfless and sustained acts of service, should not be underestimated. Take, for instance, a group of middle-schoolers in Vanuatu who created a small marine reserve that was so successful in reinvigorating a section of nearby coral reef that not only the adults of their village but two other villages replicated their efforts. Similarly, a youth group in Uganda convened a series of community discussions on the importance of educating the girl child, and subsequently saw the village send its first young woman to college. Examples abound of morally empowered young people exerting an influence that can inspire a whole community to arise in action. 

* * * 

These examples are intended to highlight certain elements that seem to be central to the empowerment of rural women and girls. Among them:
a means for delivering high-quality education at the village level, driven by the community itself

  • a focus on both the material and spiritual aspects of individual and collective life 

  • an approach which quickly translates study into acts of service

  • consultative spaces to identify and explore cultural values and assumptions

of means, such as just laws, equitable service provision, promotion of artistic and cultural expression, and others. In all these areas, they have powerful means to provide for the advancement of women and girls. We hope that the above considerations will be helpful in implementing the gender goals and targets of Agenda 2030 and in pursuing the equality of women and men more broadly.

Towards a Just Economic Order: Conceptual Foundations and Moral Prerequisites

Towards a Just Economic Order: Conceptual Foundations and Moral Prerequisites

A statement of the Baha'i International Community to the 56th session of the Commission for Social Development

New York—29 January 2018

To eradicate poverty is to build the world anew - economically, but also morally, culturally, and socially. A world without poverty, its communities and patterns of life, would bear little resemblance to the one around us today. The Commission’s work of “eradicating poverty to achieve sustainable development for all”, therefore, is not simply a matter of expanding access to material resources, challenging as that can be. Rather, it is an endeavor of structural and social transformation on scales never attempted before. And the magnitude of that work calls for new ways of understanding individual human beings and society as a whole.

Conceptual models of what is normal, natural, and possible exert a powerful influence on personal behavior. For example, individuals tend to make less generous choices the more they are exposed to the self-centered calculations inherent in classic economic theory. Such models also inform the structures of society, privileging certain kinds of values over others and shaping ways of seeing, understanding, and approaching the world. The models we employ, therefore, are of crucial importance. Some help to release latent potential, confer greater clarity of thought, illuminate unexpected paths forward, and facilitate constructive action. Others distort, constrain, and confuse.

Humanity has employed countless conceptual models throughout its history, their various elements contributing to progress in some instances and hindering it in others. But regardless of what has come before, it is clear that the transformational change required today calls for new vantage points from which to explore challenges, assess realities, and imagine solutions. We must therefore be prepared to assess - and if necessary, revise - the assumptions that have shaped the current international order and structures of society.

Consider, for example, the belief that humanity is inherently contentious and conflict is unavoidable. That human behaviour is driven primarily by self-interest, and prosperity must therefore be based on the pursuit of personal advantage. That the well-being of groups or nations can be meaningfully understood on their own, disconnected and in isolation from the well-being of humanity as a whole. That the contemporary world is characterized by a fundamental lack of human and material resources, rather than an abundance of them.

Notions such as these, implicit and unspoken in many cases, go largely unchallenged in contemporary discourse. But their real-world consequences are significant indeed. Can the belief that human beings are inherently selfish be anything but destructive when applied in contexts such as the community, the family, or the school? Can an understanding of economics grounded in a presumption of individuals or groups gaining advantage over others lead to anything but the grossly unequal conditions multiplying on every side? Alternatively, what would global economic structures look like if collaboration were understood to be a more powerful driver of development than competition? How would extremes of poverty and excesses of wealth be addressed if the good of the individual were truly understood to be inseparable from the good of the whole? What policies would be enacted if governmental priorities were shaped primarily by the interests of the citizenry at large, rather than by the preferences of a select few with privileged access to the halls of power?

Given the unprecedented pace of transition in the current age, the Bahá’í International Community calls on Member States and others at the Commission for Social Development to initiate a profound reevaluation of the assumptions on which development initiatives rest. Efforts must be made to ensure that the policies being undertaken by the international community are consonant with the values it is espousing, that the propositions taken to be established fact are still valid in light of emerging global realities, that the axioms proclaimed in global fora are consistent with evidence encountered in the field. Consider, for example, the disconnect between an age in which countless aspects of daily life are impacted by profound global interdependence, on the one hand, and on the other, pronouncements from the highest levels that well-being is best sought through the pursuit of narrow national interest. Similarly contradictory is the supposition that unfettered competition could be compatible with the “collaborative partnership” and “spirit of strengthened global solidarity” envisioned in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and other United Nations initiatives. These are issues of critical importance. Continued progress requires increasing clarity and depth of understanding about ourselves and the conditions around us. Only to the degree that our mental map of the world is accurate can we hope to chart a true course to a better future.

A systematic reassessment of this kind would involve actors of many types, within the United Nations and beyond. Academics might investigate the foundations of current models and the benefits and risks of alternatives - for example, economic models in which prosperity is more broadly defined and no longer seen as a product of production and consumption alone. Policy makers and arbiters of affairs at all levels might examine the presumptions underlying current policies and assess the possibility of unintended consequences - for example, whether assumptions of conflict in human nature might inadvertently perpetuate those very patterns of hostility. Practitioners might evaluate whether operating procedures and approaches run contrary to organizational values, reinforcing perceptions of otherness and undermining a stated commitment to equal partnership with local communities.

What might the reframing of such a discourse look like in practice? Consider the perceived lack of resources mentioned above. Data clearly demonstrate that ours is a world of abundance, at least in the aggregate. Global per capita GDP, for example, stood at $16,143 in 2016 - a figure that would represent a vast increase in monetary resources for the majority of the world’s people. Similarly, more than enough food is produced to feed all of humanity today. These are not new or novel observations. Yet countless discussions begin and end with a perceived lack of funds or supplies, rather than an exploration of why the vast resources available to the human race are utilized as they currently are.

Many organizations and individuals undoubtedly lack the resources they feel they need. Yet at the systemic level, the assumption that “there isn’t enough money” fundamentally misreads the relevant realities of the world. Financial resources are becoming increasingly concentrated in certain segments of society, generating both unconscionable extremes of wealth and inexcusable depths of poverty. Realities such as these are incompatible with the ideals of justice, equity, and dignity to which the global community has committed itself. In addition to moral considerations, these dynamics can be highly destabilizing and corrosive to the social fabric, and represent a clear and tangible danger to society. Yet the worst of their effects can be ameliorated through adjustments at the level of policy and practice, and all actors - governments, companies, citizens - should acknowledge their responsibility in this regard. The challenge, then, is not one of scarcity, but rather the choices and values that must inform the allocation of resources.

This example and others like it demonstrate the necessity of identifying the premises underlying approaches, and consciously exploring how they enhance or hinder efforts. Equally important is the ability to articulate the principles that current procedures and systems should be translating into on-the-ground realities. That the human race is one interdependent whole; that women and men are inherently equal; that force must be made the servant of justice; that truthfulness is the foundation of personal integrity and lasting social progress - if these are propositions that we believe in, our organizations and efforts must increasingly reflect and embody them at every level.

What is being called for is a review of the international community’s framework for collective thought and action. Such an effort cannot be confined to a one-time initiative, if it is to be effective. Rather, deep reflection, woven into the ongoing functioning of the entire United Nations system will be needed. Notable progress was made over the course of the Millennium Development Goals; the Sustainable Development Goals demand even wider vision and more creative thinking. It is time, then, to reassess foundational beliefs about ourselves, the nature of our relationships, and the realities shaping the world we live in. Only in this way can the groundwork for true and sustainable progress be laid.

 

Rising Generations: Weaving a New Tapestry of Community Life

Rising Generations: Weaving a New Tapestry of Community Life

Offered as a contribution to the 7th Annual ECOSOC Youth Forum at the United Nations

New York—25 January 2018

The adoption of aspirational global agendas in multiple spheres, such as Agenda 2030 and the Paris Climate Agreement, can be seen as indicators of humanity trying to move towards a new stage of development. The current period may be regarded as one of transition from a fractured, violent, and divided past towards a just and united global civilization. While many of the injustices and crises prevalent in the world today may create feelings of anxiety and hopelessness, the Bahá’í International Community is confident that the rising generations will play a vital role in weaving a new tapestry of community life that can propel humanity’s evolution towards a period of maturity and collective prosperity.

There appears to be growing consensus that many of our current systems of governance, economics, health, and education, among others, are inadequate to meet the demands of an increasingly interconnected, global society. While many agree that the present moment is one for innovation, entrepreneurship, and experimentation with new models, there is less consensus around who should be doing this and what processes should be followed. The experience of the Bahá’í worldwide community suggests that young people have a significant role to play in transforming society. When youth are taken seriously and resources are channeled towards different programs that raise their capacity to become significant actors in processes of community change, the results can be striking.

 

 

An arena for unified action

An arena where young people may take their first steps to improve the conditions of the world they have inherited is the community. Communities can emerge out of various kinds of association, for example, the inhabitants of a village or neighborhood, the followers of a religion, those associated with the life of an educational establishment, or the members of a profession. While communities of association take many forms, there is a universal dimension to living in a shared environment with others that makes communities of place ideal arenas for consideration.

A community is one of the basic units of civilization, comprised of individuals, families and social institutions. In the context of community, individuals can build friendships, form civil associations, and, alongside institutions, develop programs and systems that can create rich patterns of interaction, and form the basis of common life. When a community sees its purpose as contributing its share to the betterment of society, it can become a setting in which powers are multiplied in unified action, where individual will and collective volition are blended, and where a spirit of enterprise is reinforced by a realization of the need for concerted action and a commitment to the common good. Healthy communities attend to the development of their members, channeling resources towards programs and institutions that can nurture the moral, spiritual, intellectual, and physical development of every person. Likewise, in such communities, bonds of trust and fellowship, of camaraderie and cooperation tend to be strong. Local governing bodies, educational institutions and families all seek to nurture relationships of this quality.

To serve their communities effectively, young people should strive to understand with growing clarity the implications of the principle of the oneness of humanity. For too long, differences among human beings, both real and imagined, have served as obstacles preventing the progress of entire peoples and nations. This planet is our one, common homeland. We must all care for it. We must all have the opportunity to thrive in it. Regardless of differences in class, culture, ethnicity, belief, nationality, and gender, at our core, we share a common identity -- we are all human. In those essential aspects of life -- in the capacity of every human being to dream, to think, to create; in the longing of every person to find happiness, to grow, to connect with others -- we are without distinction.  Oneness, however, does not suggest homogeneity. Every culture has positive and negative traits. It is possible to be rooted in a community without being bound to its harmful traditions and practices. Young people throughout the ages have been characterized by certain qualities: they are curious, they question and probe the world around them, they are adaptable and open to change, and they have an acute sense of justice. Young people, then, can work closely with the different members of their communities to begin to consider which elements of culture they would like to reinforce, and which they would like to dispense with.

The Role of the Rising Generations

The rising generations are faced with no less a task than transforming the foundations of community life. A materialistic ideology that has placed the accumulation of wealth at the center of existence, and promoted individualism as healthy, has impacted every facet of life. The prioritization of economic growth through self-interested competition has stripped many communities of spiritual qualities such as trust, cooperation, fellowship and love. When the spiritual dimensions of life are corroded, they cannot be mended by material things. Material and spiritual challenges demand both material and spiritual solutions. Weaving a new tapestry of community life that reflects values like justice and generosity, selflessness and equality, will require the participation of generations of people, offering their distinct contributions according to the opportunities and challenges of their historical moment. How will the current generation of young people contribute its share to this great undertaking? 

Those committed to building vibrant and healthy communities will be engaged in a long process of learning in action. The learning process unfolds in a way that resembles the growth and differentiation of a living organism. As experience accrues, obstacles are gradually overcome, and resources multiplied, different efforts can grow and expand in their scope and reach. Although young people should avoid the trap of conceiving of their efforts in narrow terms of success versus failure, they must also re-examine their visions and strategies time and again. While haphazard change should be avoided and continuity of action maintained, modifications in goals and methods should be made in the light of experience and a framework of shared values. Young people should also be prepared to develop comfort with a certain degree of uncertainty or ambiguity as they chart new ways forward.

A mode of learning in action will be easier to sustain if young people adopt a posture of humility. Such a posture allows people to rejoice in the success of others, to share their own ideas, talents and skills generously and with detachment, and frees them from feeling threatened by those with different ideas, talents and skills. Humility helps youth execute plans with a degree of flexibility required in any learning process. A culture of learning characterized by humility also encourages those with more experience to assist those with less experience to take their first steps in a given arena of action. In a culture permeated by a spirit of humility, it is easier for people to work together intergenerationally. The novice knows that he can learn from the veteran just as the veteran knows that she can learn from the novice.

A practical way to engage various members of the community to help set goals and execute plans is to create spaces for consultation. Whether concerned with analysing a specific situation, trying to gain a fuller understanding of a given issue, exploring a possible course of action, or arriving at a decision, consultation may be seen as a collective search for truth. The participants in a consultative process are not interested in exercising power over one another or convincing one another of the validity of their perspectives. Rather, they participate with an understanding that different people see reality from different points of view, and as these views are examined and understood, new insights emerge and clarity is gained. Some consultative spaces might bring together groups of parents who would like to share concerns about and aspirations for their children. Other spaces might bring together groups of friends providing similar types of service to the community  -- teachers of classes for children and youth, friends tending to gardens and farms together, entrepreneurs identifying unique resources their community can contribute to enrich the society around them. Periodic spaces where these different groups can all come together and reflect on the current state of the community as a whole while planning for the months ahead would also contribute to the flourishing of a healthy, interconnected and united community.

 

 

Transforming the Foundations of Community Life

Given its centrality to numerous aspects of modern life, the principles animating activity in the economic sphere deserve special consideration. Likewise, conceptions around the purpose of work and opportunities for employment are driven to a large extent by dominant economic models. Both must be reimagined in the light of oneness.

i. Economic Activity

The well-being of any segment of humanity is connected with the well-being of the whole. When economic gain is pursued without regard for how the natural environment is affected, for instance, all are impacted. Yet, time and again, greed and self-interest obstruct collective flourishing. Dizzying quantities of wealth are being amassed into fewer and fewer hands, and the instability and volatility this creates is amplified by disparities in income and opportunity both between and within nations. But as persistent as these inequalities have been, they do not represent an intractable state of reality, nor are they destined to define the future. Wealth should serve humanity; humanity should not be sacrificed for wealth.

Similarly, systems and structures should serve the interests of all peoples. The rising generations will have the opportunity and the responsibility to learn how collective prosperity can be advanced through justice and generosity, through collaboration and mutual assistance. Regardless of the material resources available in a given community, there is a wealth of intellectual and spiritual resources that a community can draw upon. For instance, the creativity of a community’s inhabitants, the resourcefulness of its institutions, and the power for unified action among its different actors are significant resources that young people should also learn to harness.

ii. Meaningful Work

An increase in meaningful work opportunities for young people will be bolstered by the embrace of a new, shared value system that takes into account a wide range of human needs and aspirations. This value system will necessarily challenge widely-held assumptions that underpin our current economic models -- for instance, that competition drives progress, that human beings perform best when promoting their own self-interests, that the crowning achievement of an individual or a nation is found in the accumulation of wealth. It will require a revision of conceptions of work around the ideals of inclusion, universal participation, and reciprocity. Moreover, to be sustainable, it will be critical that work, as the activity that tends to occupy the central portion of our waking hours, be a source of meaning and provide a way to contribute to the betterment of society. To accomplish its purpose, work must not be reduced to a mere means of satisfying wants and needs. It must find constant expression in service to humanity. When performed in a spirit of service, work may indeed be regarded as an act of worship.

 

A Culture of Friendship

While adversarial approaches to social change are often given the most attention in popular media, change of the magnitude required cannot rest on the shaky foundation of disunity. If young people long for a world of unity and friendship, their approaches to bringing that world into being must embody those very attributes. Similarly, persevering in efforts to serve society -- particularly in the face of difficult or even harsh conditions -- will be easier to do when flanked by close friends and trusted loved ones.

Serving closely with others creates opportunities to form bonds of friendship and provides practical means of getting to know neighbors and community members. For instance, the young man who arises to teach classes for the moral education of children in his community will build friendships with the children, their siblings, their parents, and other young people engaged in the same effort. The group of friends who arise with determination to beautify their neighborhood’s common areas will reach out to a number of different community members and institutions who can help them identify plots of land that could be repurposed as a garden, as a park, or some other form that the community agrees on. They will organize consultative spaces for the community to make plans, identify volunteers, raise funds, secure donations, and draw on different individual talents so that many people can tend to every dimension of the effort.

Ultimately, as service draws young people further into the lives of the members of their communities, they will strengthen bonds of trust and feel genuine care and concern for every aspect of one another’s lives, delighting in one another’s accomplishments and offering support through one another’s hardships. In such a culture, they will lay a foundation of friendship and trust, a foundation of love, from which the seeds of a prosperous world civilization can bloom.

 

 

UN Human Rights Council – 36th Session

UN Human Rights Council – 36th Session

Agenda Item 10

Geneva—28 September 2017

Mr. President,

The people of Yemen are all suffering under an extremely dire humanitarian situation, and their strife appears to be daily increasing. Furthermore, Yemeni Bahá’ís, as a religious minority, are experiencing additional pressure solely because of their beliefs.

After arresting over 60 men, women, and children who were participating in an educational conference organized by an NGO and the Bahá’í community in 2016, the authorities in Sana’a called in April of this year for the arrest of over 25 Bahá’ís, many of whom are prominent community members assisting with the organization of community affairs. They are accused, among other things, of showing kindness in order to attract people to their Faith and arranging meetings for Bahá’ís.

Today, there are seven Bahá’ís arbitrarily detained in the Houthi-controlled region of Yemen. Five of these are held in undisclosed locations and the prosecutor, Rajeh Zayed, is ensuring that all seven are held indefinitely by continually postponing their trials. Moreover, Bahá’í families have been forced to abandon their homes and go into hiding in order to avoid unjust detention. Information from reliable sources confirms that Iranian authorities are behind these persecutions.

Mr. President, despite the harrowing circumstances, the Yemeni Bahá’ís have refused to side with one group or another and have instead endeavoured to serve all people. Their efforts have been centred on tribal reconciliation, reconstruction, medical assistance, youth empowerment, education, and humanitarian and disaster relief. The Human Rights Council must give a strong signal to the Houthi and Saleh authorities, as well as to Iran, that this oppression must stop.

UN Human Rights Council – 36th Session

UN Human Rights Council – 36th Session

UN Human Rights Council – 36th Session, September 2017

Agenda Item 4

Geneva—19 September 2017

Mr. President,

Yesterday, Mrs. Mahvash Sabet was released after having completed her sentence of 10 years of imprisonment. She was one of the “Yaran” – a group of seven members that managed the spiritual and administrative affairs of the Baha’i community in Iran. She was freed earlier than the others because she had been taken in before them. While the Baha’i International Community is certainly pleased to see Mrs. Sabet be reunited with her family and friends, unfortunately, there is nothing to rejoice about because she is still not fully free.

When Mahvash Sabet entered the notorious Evin prison in 2008, the Baha’is in Iran lived in a society where their youth were deprived of access to higher education and public jobs, small Baha’i-owned shops were attacked, their cemeteries were desecrated, they were vilified in state sponsored media on a daily basis, and they were arbitrarily arrested and imprisoned solely for their beliefs. Today, 10 years later, despite the rhetorical claims made by President Rouhani that all Iranians are granted equal rights as citizens, Baha’is face exactly the same forms of discrimination as they did back then, in education, in employment, in the courts, and in every other interaction in their daily lives.

In one of her prison poems, Mrs. Sabet wrote:

“The day when no one is punished for the sake of her beliefs

Or subjected to another’s will

The day when mothers won’t be thrown into prison

Or abandon their children in ways so cruel

The day when persecution and detention cease

And this oppressive siege comes to an end:

That day you will be decked in honour and pride

For you too will have played your part in this crusade.”

Mr. President, it is high time that the international community plays its part in calling upon the Iranian government to once and for all cease its relentless persecution of a segment of its own population.

HRC35 - Item4

HRC35 - Item4

Item:4 General Debate - 23rd Meeting, 35th Regular Session Human Rights Council

Geneva—15 June 2017

Mr. President,

Just weeks ago, two brothers, who had stabbed to death Mr. Farhang Amiri in the city of Yazd in Iran and in front of his house, were brought to court where they admitted to having killed Mr. Amiri because he was a Baha'i and therefore an apostate. They also claimed that his murder was in fact a pious deed, justified by verses from the Holy Qu’ran. They showed no remorse and, on the contrary, appeared to be prepared to kill other Baha'is as well.  Having heard all of this, the judge decided to release them on bail.  It is inconceivable to imagine such an act by a judge if the victim were not a Baha'i.

This impunity that prevails in Iran stems from the clear government policy that Baha'is must be treated differently than other Iranians, that their blood can be shed, that they can be imprisoned for long sentences without any proof to substantiate their charges, that their properties can be confiscated, that their shops can be sealed under the excuse that they were closed on Baha'i Holy Days, and that their youth can be denied access to higher education. Many of these injustices are outlined in an official 1991 government memorandum that deals with “The Baha'i Question”.

Another point of this memorandum, which was revealed two years later by the then-UN Special Representative on Iran, states that their cultural roots outside the country must also be confronted and destroyed.

Today, Iran has exported its persecution of the Baha'is to Yemen, where a similar systematic campaign is being waged against them by the Houthi de facto authorities. Yemeni Baha'is are imprisoned with no legal basis and detained indefinitely by being denied a proper court hearing, and tens of others, including women, have been issued arrest warrants, forcing them into hiding for weeks.

Mr. President,

The Iranian government has time and again repeated its commitment to human rights principles and is a signatory of the two Covenants. It is time that the international community call on the Islamic Republic of Iran to stop treating Iranian Baha'is without regard for these commitments and to stop inciting hatred against Baha'is, both within and outside of its borders.

Peace and Resilience: Engaging Effectively at the Local Level

Peace and Resilience: Engaging Effectively at the Local Level

Brussels—30 April 2017

The concept of resilience has in recent years become increasingly important in the discourse on peace, featuring prominently in the recent EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy. One of the defining characteristics that has emerged in the conversation on resilience is the attempt to look for existing sources of strength and capacity at the local level within conflict-affected societies and seek to build on these as a vehicle for lasting transformation. In doing so, the focus on resilience captures an important insight: conflict-affected communities should be looked at through the lens of strength and potentiality, not fragility. This shift in focus has practical implications. While insights and resources from international actors are essential, a strength-based framework will recognize that peace is not transposed from outside, but must be driven by constructive sources within. To effectively promote resilience, then, international practitioners will need to think further about how to engage with local actors, including at the grassroots level, in ways that allow and encourage local capacities to emerge.

One way in which local capacity can be cultivated is by adopting a posture which does not assume a fixed conception of the destiny of a particular community nor advocates for preconceived solutions. In this respect, it is important that engagement with local populations does not turn into a symbolic listening exercise; on the contrary, local actors, from the earliest stages, should be seen as the drivers of the peace-building process. This is not to assume that struggling communities have all the resources they need to overcome conflict. Nor is it to trivialize the challenge of bringing together antagonistic and disillusioned actors in order to transform hostility and apathy into commitment to long-term collaboration. The point, rather, is that the particular posture adopted is instrumental in creating a climate in which local skills, knowledge and capacities can develop and find full expression. A truly participatory form of engagement allows peace-building processes to draw on the understanding of those who have insights into their immediate social reality, appreciate cultural dynamics and concerns, are able to identify and navigate existing local networks, and can discern needs and opportunities.

For such local participation in the peace process to be sustained in the long-term and hence be truly transformative, care must be exercised to not pit, however subtly, one group against another in struggles for political power, or treat the peace-building process as a transactional bargaining endeavour. Such approaches would fail to address the underlying conditions that caused the conflict in the first place. For, ultimately, the sustainability of peace-building endeavours depends on the different segments of society recognizing that they are interdependent rather than incompatible, and that diversity is an opportunity, not a threat. 

One of the ways in which the EU can effectively engage at the local level, while drawing on its own experience and giving due consideration to the above points, is by strengthening, and where appropriate initiating, spaces in which a rich conversation about what it means to build a peaceful and resilient society can unfold. Such spaces will need to go beyond bringing together state-level actors and focus also on gathering actors at the grassroots. Experience must also be gathered in creating spaces that allow grassroots actors to interact with their institutions at various levels in order to build a climate of trust and collaboration. Such spaces might initially begin as an informal conversation among a few grassroots actors, including women and youth. These conversations could begin by jointly analysing reality in order to better understand the challenges and opportunities that the community currently faces — itself an exercise which not only lays a foundation for the identification of solutions, but importantly also builds mutual understanding. In some places, ongoing commitment to such spaces will be needed to allow them to evolve into more formal structures, with a growing number of participants, where experiences are reflected on and solutions are identified jointly. Naturally, the creation of such spaces raises a number of important questions, such as: How can all relevant actors and groups be identified and included? In particular, how can women and youth be empowered to participate in decision-making spaces from which they may traditionally have been excluded? What is to be done in situations where the fabric of social cohesion has been so damaged that it is difficult to convene diverse members of the community? No matter the particularities and complexities of a conflict, these spaces can be created at all points in the conflict cycle, both in periods of acute conflict, and as a tool for pre-emptive conflict prevention and post-conflict reconciliation.

At the heart of effective engagement with the local level is operating in a mode of learning in which ongoing reflection on experience allows the continual refinement of approach and strategy. Best practices and insights are systematically captured and documented. Consensus grows on the immediate steps forward. In sum, peace building initiatives become more responsive to circumstances on the ground.

Pages

Subscribe to English